- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Critics seem to be baffled by "Emilia Perez" getting 13 nominations
Posted on 1/24/25 at 12:47 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 1/24/25 at 12:47 pm to Fun Bunch
I for one have been enjoying watching all the theater kids lose their damn minds over Perez outperforming Wicked. I have no dog in the fight (haven’t seen either movie) but the audience response hs been amusing.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 1:03 pm to Fun Bunch
Is this a tranny operation musical? That little scene was terrible.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 1:07 pm to Saint Alfonzo
I watched about 20 minutes with my wife and found it offensively bad. Like, I would expect more Razzie nominations than Academy Award nominations.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:17 pm to Fun Bunch
Well that was one of dumbest plot summaries I've ever read. I don't even know where to begin a critique
White Chicks is more believable
White Chicks is more believable
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:25 pm to Fun Bunch
Content aside, that song is just plain... BAD.
I can't tell if it's supposed to be in the "so bad it's funny" category or just the "bad" category, but I stopped it after two verses it was so painful.
I can't tell if it's supposed to be in the "so bad it's funny" category or just the "bad" category, but I stopped it after two verses it was so painful.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:27 pm to artisticsavant
quote:
but I do remember the year Denzel won and it was made a big deal because of race,
Which time (1989 or 2001)?
FWIW, he deserved both of his awards.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:43 pm to 9Fiddy
quote:
A feared cartel leader Juan “Little Hands” wants to fake his death to live her true authentic life.
I saw a clip on TikTok a while back and it made it seem that this big time drug lord started dressing as a woman to evade authorities, and it got me interested, then I saw it was a musical and said nah I'm good.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:59 pm to HuskyPanda
I saw it because like some else said me and my wife try to watch all the Oscar nominees in preparation for Oscar night. Having said that, the movie is just not great. Its tone is all over the place. The musical aspect of it is not good. There is so much overreacting it seemed like a Mexican soap opera at times. It was way to hammy at times.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 3:06 pm to JW
quote:
As one of these “woke morons” per another poster
JW, I've seen your posts for a while. I genuinely have never once thought "JW is woke." You might have different political views than the forum or board as a whole, I have never seen anything that makes me think you're "woke."
Nominating an objectively bad movie because it has "minorities" and a trans person for the cause is woke. i'm pretty anti-woke, and i saw the talent behind Dutch Girl and Moonlight.
While it's a huge fight amongst what "woke" means, my interpretation is "Cultlike adherence to leftist social orthodoxy enforced by social and mainstream media in response to backlash against western culture."
You can be pro BLM, trans, gay, and a socialist and not be anything resembling the above.
ETA: I just reviewed your IMDB and realized you were on the Holdovers. nothing but high praise for that one.
ironically, my wife and son thinks it looks awful and won't watch it because of the art direction and i've watched it 3 times in the last year or so and it's the most beautiful cinematographically and artistically filmed movie i remember in a long time.
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 3:39 pm
Posted on 1/24/25 at 4:20 pm to Fun Bunch
The elites will gladly fail to virtue signal that Trump bad.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 4:36 pm to Fun Bunch
It doesn’t matter if it’s bad or good or if the actor was bad or good it’s just one more thing the left is placing women below men who pretend to be women.
I am sure Trump’s election influenced a victimhood that Hollywood felt they need to account for and then be able to show some Clooney level smugness during the ceremony.
I am sure Trump’s election influenced a victimhood that Hollywood felt they need to account for and then be able to show some Clooney level smugness during the ceremony.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 4:42 pm to Fun Bunch
I can't keep from watching that clip every time I click the link to this board.
What the frick is that?
What the frick is that?
Posted on 1/24/25 at 4:49 pm to Fun Bunch
Hollywood is so confused.
What happened to pleasing the middle ground?
It's either lazy cash grabs of plastic Marvel/DC or pandering shite nobody wants to see but for the fringe.
This is the dead ball era of Hollywood.
What happened to pleasing the middle ground?
It's either lazy cash grabs of plastic Marvel/DC or pandering shite nobody wants to see but for the fringe.
This is the dead ball era of Hollywood.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 5:06 pm to JW
lol. They don't need member wide instructions. They are all indoctrinated. No need for silly instructions. 13 nominations makes it pretty clear.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 5:20 pm to Wally Sparks
quote:
Which time (1989 or 2001)?
Training Day, so 2001. And I'm not disputing him deserving the award, I do believe it was from his speech itself. I don't think I'm mistaking this for the year Foxx one for Ray, but there was a lot of media pressure and discontent about non-white nominees constantly being passed over.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 5:45 pm to artisticsavant
Thanks for the Holdovers love! That was a special project.
The "woke morons" was just a direct response to the poster talking about the Academy members (I am one of them). More in jest really. I would hope a film gets nominations on merit and quality, so if this movie is as terrible as some claim then that's unfortunate (i still need to see it).
I totally get the criticism and understand the sentiments about certain agendas, which certainly exists. But for the most part, the only persuasion Most of us get is getting invited to high end screenings and receptions that often involve the stars and free booze.
The "woke morons" was just a direct response to the poster talking about the Academy members (I am one of them). More in jest really. I would hope a film gets nominations on merit and quality, so if this movie is as terrible as some claim then that's unfortunate (i still need to see it).
I totally get the criticism and understand the sentiments about certain agendas, which certainly exists. But for the most part, the only persuasion Most of us get is getting invited to high end screenings and receptions that often involve the stars and free booze.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 6:57 pm to JW
quote:
What people forget is the Academy’s international membership. I would say a third is international based and will carry associated biases.
Emilia Perez did extremely well at Cannes. It seems international critics and industry have liked it much more than American critics and audiences.
Accusing this movie of being woke and inclusive is weird. It's offended trans people and Mexicans, and is a Mexican story directed by a Frenchman starring a bunch of Americans.
The trans element is exploitative, at best. Similar to that forced conversion hit man movie Walter Hill made with Michelle Rodriguez. I doubt anyone would consider that woke.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 11:24 pm to Jay Are
quote:
The trans element is exploitative, at best. Similar to that forced conversion hit man movie Walter Hill made with Michelle Rodriguez. I doubt anyone would consider that woke
Hoffman won a GG and an Oscar nom for cross dressing and (even though it wasn’t in the vernacular at the time) nobody called it “woke.”
I think the difference now is what we know of Hollywood and Foreign Press’ mainstream thinking (trying not to accuse them of being a monolith,) is that this would be a shoe in for awards regardless of its’ actual merits. When I read the plot 2 months ago I called that the dude would be nominated for best actress regardless of the performance.
And let’s be honest, the last 3 major films dealing with transition/non-binary have all been lauded by critics (Danish Girl, Conclave, EP.)
Ask yourself, would the critics have liked Conclave without the twist?
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 1/24/25 at 11:44 pm to Lawyered
quote:
Sending a message that if you make films like this, they will be rewarded irregardless if the movie is good or not
A lot of writer's assistants (who are aspiring writers) in LA are taking this approach because their material is being passed over in favor of queer and minority empowerment shite. So it's either "do as the Romans do" or find another career.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:21 am to 3nOut
quote:
And let’s be honest, the last 3 major films dealing with transition/non-binary have all been lauded by critics (Danish Girl, Conclave, EP.)
1. Both The Danish Girl and Emilia Perez were not lauded by critics. That's what a few of us have been saying in this thread about EP. The Danish Girl being nominated for multiple oscars and even winning one was a joke in 2016, as it was another movie that no one really liked (and another movie that was considered offensive by trans/non-binary people)
2. Lumping Conclave with those is weird, and you know it.
3. The general critical consensus is that the twist is the weakest part of Conclave. Critics liked it because it was a fast-paced, classically entertaining chamber drama with great performances, until a final-5-minute twist. I think they would have liked it much more without the twist, given that's what so many have already written.
Popular
Back to top


0














