Started By
Message

re: Critics seem to be baffled by "Emilia Perez" getting 13 nominations

Posted on 1/24/25 at 12:47 pm to
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
49024 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 12:47 pm to
I for one have been enjoying watching all the theater kids lose their damn minds over Perez outperforming Wicked. I have no dog in the fight (haven’t seen either movie) but the audience response hs been amusing.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30264 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 1:03 pm to
Is this a tranny operation musical? That little scene was terrible.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 1:07 pm to
I watched about 20 minutes with my wife and found it offensively bad. Like, I would expect more Razzie nominations than Academy Award nominations.
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
8463 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:17 pm to
Well that was one of dumbest plot summaries I've ever read. I don't even know where to begin a critique


White Chicks is more believable
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 2:18 pm
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
35403 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:25 pm to
Content aside, that song is just plain... BAD.

I can't tell if it's supposed to be in the "so bad it's funny" category or just the "bad" category, but I stopped it after two verses it was so painful.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
32737 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

but I do remember the year Denzel won and it was made a big deal because of race,


Which time (1989 or 2001)?

FWIW, he deserved both of his awards.
Posted by HuskyPanda
Philly
Member since Feb 2018
2422 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

A feared cartel leader Juan “Little Hands” wants to fake his death to live her true authentic life.


I saw a clip on TikTok a while back and it made it seem that this big time drug lord started dressing as a woman to evade authorities, and it got me interested, then I saw it was a musical and said nah I'm good.
Posted by PillPusher
Gulf Coast
Member since Oct 2009
5947 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 2:59 pm to
I saw it because like some else said me and my wife try to watch all the Oscar nominees in preparation for Oscar night. Having said that, the movie is just not great. Its tone is all over the place. The musical aspect of it is not good. There is so much overreacting it seemed like a Mexican soap opera at times. It was way to hammy at times.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32399 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 3:06 pm to
quote:


As one of these “woke morons” per another poster



JW, I've seen your posts for a while. I genuinely have never once thought "JW is woke." You might have different political views than the forum or board as a whole, I have never seen anything that makes me think you're "woke."

Nominating an objectively bad movie because it has "minorities" and a trans person for the cause is woke. i'm pretty anti-woke, and i saw the talent behind Dutch Girl and Moonlight.

While it's a huge fight amongst what "woke" means, my interpretation is "Cultlike adherence to leftist social orthodoxy enforced by social and mainstream media in response to backlash against western culture."

You can be pro BLM, trans, gay, and a socialist and not be anything resembling the above.


ETA: I just reviewed your IMDB and realized you were on the Holdovers. nothing but high praise for that one.

ironically, my wife and son thinks it looks awful and won't watch it because of the art direction and i've watched it 3 times in the last year or so and it's the most beautiful cinematographically and artistically filmed movie i remember in a long time.

This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 3:39 pm
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47215 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 4:20 pm to
The elites will gladly fail to virtue signal that Trump bad.

Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10613 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 4:36 pm to
It doesn’t matter if it’s bad or good or if the actor was bad or good it’s just one more thing the left is placing women below men who pretend to be women.

I am sure Trump’s election influenced a victimhood that Hollywood felt they need to account for and then be able to show some Clooney level smugness during the ceremony.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 4:42 pm to
I can't keep from watching that clip every time I click the link to this board.

What the frick is that?
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39420 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 4:49 pm to
Hollywood is so confused.

What happened to pleasing the middle ground?

It's either lazy cash grabs of plastic Marvel/DC or pandering shite nobody wants to see but for the fringe.

This is the dead ball era of Hollywood.



Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41555 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 5:06 pm to
lol. They don't need member wide instructions. They are all indoctrinated. No need for silly instructions. 13 nominations makes it pretty clear.
Posted by artisticsavant
Member since Mar 2017
5436 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Which time (1989 or 2001)?


Training Day, so 2001. And I'm not disputing him deserving the award, I do believe it was from his speech itself. I don't think I'm mistaking this for the year Foxx one for Ray, but there was a lot of media pressure and discontent about non-white nominees constantly being passed over.
Posted by JW
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2004
5252 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 5:45 pm to
Thanks for the Holdovers love! That was a special project.

The "woke morons" was just a direct response to the poster talking about the Academy members (I am one of them). More in jest really. I would hope a film gets nominations on merit and quality, so if this movie is as terrible as some claim then that's unfortunate (i still need to see it).

I totally get the criticism and understand the sentiments about certain agendas, which certainly exists. But for the most part, the only persuasion Most of us get is getting invited to high end screenings and receptions that often involve the stars and free booze.

Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6130 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

What people forget is the Academy’s international membership. I would say a third is international based and will carry associated biases.


Emilia Perez did extremely well at Cannes. It seems international critics and industry have liked it much more than American critics and audiences.

Accusing this movie of being woke and inclusive is weird. It's offended trans people and Mexicans, and is a Mexican story directed by a Frenchman starring a bunch of Americans.

The trans element is exploitative, at best. Similar to that forced conversion hit man movie Walter Hill made with Michelle Rodriguez. I doubt anyone would consider that woke.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32399 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

The trans element is exploitative, at best. Similar to that forced conversion hit man movie Walter Hill made with Michelle Rodriguez. I doubt anyone would consider that woke


Hoffman won a GG and an Oscar nom for cross dressing and (even though it wasn’t in the vernacular at the time) nobody called it “woke.”

I think the difference now is what we know of Hollywood and Foreign Press’ mainstream thinking (trying not to accuse them of being a monolith,) is that this would be a shoe in for awards regardless of its’ actual merits. When I read the plot 2 months ago I called that the dude would be nominated for best actress regardless of the performance.

And let’s be honest, the last 3 major films dealing with transition/non-binary have all been lauded by critics (Danish Girl, Conclave, EP.)

Ask yourself, would the critics have liked Conclave without the twist?
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 11:26 pm
Posted by PuertoRicanBlaze
Book Board Admin
Member since Apr 2024
7518 posts
Posted on 1/24/25 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

Sending a message that if you make films like this, they will be rewarded irregardless if the movie is good or not


A lot of writer's assistants (who are aspiring writers) in LA are taking this approach because their material is being passed over in favor of queer and minority empowerment shite. So it's either "do as the Romans do" or find another career.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6130 posts
Posted on 1/25/25 at 12:21 am to
quote:

And let’s be honest, the last 3 major films dealing with transition/non-binary have all been lauded by critics (Danish Girl, Conclave, EP.)


1. Both The Danish Girl and Emilia Perez were not lauded by critics. That's what a few of us have been saying in this thread about EP. The Danish Girl being nominated for multiple oscars and even winning one was a joke in 2016, as it was another movie that no one really liked (and another movie that was considered offensive by trans/non-binary people)

2. Lumping Conclave with those is weird, and you know it.

3. The general critical consensus is that the twist is the weakest part of Conclave. Critics liked it because it was a fast-paced, classically entertaining chamber drama with great performances, until a final-5-minute twist. I think they would have liked it much more without the twist, given that's what so many have already written.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram