- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Braveheart: Longshanks throwing the aide out the window
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:37 am
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:37 am
Is it assumed that the Phillip guy, was being gay with the effeminate soy prince. And Longshanks realized this, and that's why he taught him how to fly? And that is why the prince was so upset and tried to stab his dad. Longshanks realized if the Scots found out about the prince's lifestyle, they would sack York in a day.
This post was edited on 2/4/22 at 9:44 am
15
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:40 am to burger bearcat
Is there a question or discussion point in there or are you just making an observation about a 27 year old movie?
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:40 am to burger bearcat
He defenestrated the frick out of that guy.
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:41 am to theGarnetWay
quote:
Is there a question or discussion point in there or are you just making an observation about a 27 year old movie?
I just re-watched it for the first time in about 10 years. I never connected the dots that they were both buddies like that and that's why the King gave him the heave hoe. I thought he was just doing it because he was a d*ck. Makes sense now.
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:43 am to burger bearcat
Op just likes watching gay people fly. Kind of odd, but who am I to judge?
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:44 am to burger bearcat
quote:
I just re-watched it for the first time in about 10 years. I never connected the dots that they were both buddies like that and that's why the King gave him the heave hoe. I thought he was just doing it because he was a d*ck. Makes sense now.
This post was edited on 2/4/22 at 9:45 am
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:45 am to GetCocky11
quote:
He defenestrated the frick out of that guy.
My son uses that word all the time.
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:47 am to burger bearcat
quote:
I never connected the dots
the frick
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:47 am to burger bearcat
Feels like Monty Python spoofed this 20 years before the movie happened
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:48 am to burger bearcat
It’s crazy to me that Longshanks wasn’t portrayed as the LGBT ally that he actually was
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:50 am to burger bearcat
quote:
I just re-watched it for the first time in about 10 years. I never connected the dots that they were both buddies like that and that's why the King gave him the heave hoe. I thought he was just doing it because he was a d*ck. Makes sense now.
I agree...after another re-watch, Im convinced now that William Wallace started his rebellion, not out of a quest for freedom for Scotland, but because they had murdered his wife.
Call me crazy
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:51 am to burger bearcat
quote:
I just re-watched it for the first time in about 10 years. I never connected the dots that they were both buddies like that and that's why the King gave him the heave hoe.
are you serious? it wasn't even subtle
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:57 am to 3nOut
quote:
quote:
He defenestrated the frick out of that guy.
My son uses that word all the time.
The Defenestration of Prague was the highlight of European History class.
Posted on 2/4/22 at 9:59 am to burger bearcat
quote:
I just re-watched it for the first time in about 10 years. I never connected the dots that they were both buddies like that and that's why the King gave him the heave hoe. I thought he was just doing it because he was a d*ck. Makes sense now.
Yeah, I mean it's super obvious. Not trying to be a dick.
Listen to the narrator during the marriage scene between him and the French princess. It goes along the lines that "It was said that if the princess was to conceive then Longshanks would have to do it himself, and that may have been the goal all along."
He didn't kill Philip because he had an epiphany that his son was involved with him, he did it as a punishment because his son was not interested enough in running the kingdom. He removed a distraction.
Also, Philip was giving him "advice" on how to deal with Wallace, which may have pushed him over the edge. His son was weak and easily influenced, someone using his attachment to rule via proxy was dangerous to the future of his kingdom.
This post was edited on 2/4/22 at 10:00 am
Posted on 2/4/22 at 10:05 am to DomincDecoco
quote:
I agree...after another re-watch, Im convinced now that William Wallace started his rebellion, not out of a quest for freedom for Scotland, but because they had murdered his wife.
I just watched it again. It never occurred to me the Irish guy might be crazy until just now
Posted on 2/4/22 at 10:14 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Longshanks realized if the Scots found out about the prince's lifestyle, they would sack York in a day.
I think they had already sacked York when that scene occurred. I believe that's the scene where they find out that Wallace had sacked York and he sent them the head of Longshanks' nephew.
Posted on 2/4/22 at 10:22 am to burger bearcat
My takeaway from this post is that you are highly deficient in gaydar. Which means you will be 10 minutes into an arse pounding before you realize what happened.
Posted on 2/4/22 at 10:24 am to Dirk Dawgler
Next you guys are gonna tell me that cowboy movie with Jake Gyllenhall and Heath Ledger wasn’t about consensual and non sexual male tent wrestling
Posted on 2/4/22 at 11:05 am to DomincDecoco
Agreed, but they murdered his wife because they married in secret so the English lord would not have sexual rights to her. If the Scots were free, they would not have needed to be secretly married
Posted on 2/4/22 at 11:25 am to Nyquillus Dillwad
quote:
Agreed, but they murdered his wife because they married in secret so the English lord would not have sexual rights to her. If the Scots were free, they would not have needed to be secretly married
Maybe you’re speaking in a more historical accurate context but I think the movie implies they secret marriage was because of her disapproving parents
ETA i rewatched recently but that’s how I remember it, could be wrong
This post was edited on 2/4/22 at 11:26 am
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News