Started By
Message

re: 'Birds of Prey' bombs at the box office — and feminists are blaming sexism

Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158754 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:31 pm to
its not her only thing but come on...pretty much every trailer had the shot of her bending over and stealing whatever it was from that store. Margot being hot is a huge factor. Is Rebel Wilson getting a spin off as Harley in that movie?
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 1:32 pm
Posted by USMCTIGER1970
BATON ROUGE
Member since Mar 2017
2371 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:38 pm to
How about the fact that you pretty much strayed from the source material and tried to reinvent the wheel with a SJW agenda.

IMO when it comes to adaptions of Comic's or SiFi you have to do fan service to the people who made the material popular enough for it to made in a live action movie.

When you drastically change the characters trying to please the masses you will bomb every time. Please the core and they will drive the masses to the theater.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 1:58 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72026 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

I love some of these retarded takes
Sex appeal is a thing but it isn't even close to be her only thing. Her background and story of breaking away from the Joker had a far bigger impact on her rise from show to comic to everything else
It isn’t a retarded take in regards to the movies. It is a retarded take if you read the comics, something that, I wager, a large portion of movie audiences don’t do.

Harley Quinn was an airhead bimbo sex symbol in the Suicide Squad movie, a significant departure from her comic book persona.

And in regards to the significance of her leaving The Joker, it had a bigger impact within the comic book universe because of the history they shared.

With this movie, DC made the same mistake it did with Batman v Superman. They attempted to push plot points without using the time to build an understanding within the audience of the motivations behind the actions.

It is the fatal flaw when you either assume your audience already has an understanding or requires that the audience use other sources to gain an understanding.

That was a major flaw of The Last Jedi. Important plot points and character information could only be obtained through other mediums (books).

It is a fault of the writers, not the audience.
This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 1:48 pm
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158754 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 1:57 pm to
right her breaking away from the Joker had 0 impact because they were together all of 5 minutes in screen time to the audience
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49234 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:21 pm to
Yeah and honestly I'm pretty sure the studio or someone told Ewan to spew all that. It's a shame really because the movie was, the character of Harley is great, and it seemed Margot really does love the character.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27877 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Get woke, go broke.

Hollywood just doesn't get it. Every story worth telling, has already been told. Multiple times. Throwing some garbage out there because, muh wimmenz, muh gay, muh tranny, muh minority, doesn't change the fact that people know that story has already been made. But if you liked the original better, then youre some kind of ' ist

The proof is seen in all the reboots/sequels that Hollywood keeps doing in order to sell tickets. There are simply no new stories that people are willing to spend crazy money, on just because you take out the white men from the original.

The Top 20 all-time box office movies are from when Hollywood first starting putting stories on film

Gone with the Wind
Start Wars
ET
Sound of Music
Snow White
10 Commandments
Jaws
Ben Hur
Dr Zhivago

Having an all woman Magnificent 7, or an all Hispanic Titanic, or an all gay Mary Poppins just isn't going to sell tickets. Sorry
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44542 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Rosie Perez


Spike Lee, TYFYS
Posted by Rep520
Member since Mar 2018
10409 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

And in regards to the significance of her leaving The Joker, it had a bigger impact within the comic book universe because of the history they shared.


This is part of the issue with how bad Suicide Squad was. It didn't just fail to hype up this movie, Leto's take on the Joker also kept the Joker/Harley relationship from building.

I haven't seen this new one, but it's hard to see why I should care about the end of a Joker/Harley relationship that never got going in the first place.
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:53 pm to
What I meant about the appeal is the HQ from suicide squad was latched on to by cosplayers, even before the movie.

This one managed to ditch making good cosplay stuff and fostering a broader interest by just having everyone in street clothes and HQ as a Cannery Rapist or some such.

Which could've been a great Joker Fish call in but naw.
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 2:58 pm to
Names and good repertoire of films from both.

They aren't blockbuster actors by themselves but they are usually a great or good thing in the movies they are in.

Posted by swagsurfin7
Founder of the Alex Morgan Fan Club
Member since Dec 2009
6992 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

'Birds of Prey' bombs at the box office — and feminists are blaming sexism



No... It bombed because it was poorly marketed. I'd love to know how much they spent on marketing this movie. I saw one trailer for it, and that was because it was posted on here and shared on Twitter. I had no idea it came out last week until I randomly looked on Fandango and saw movie times listed. I'll go check it out, but it didn't bomb because of why they think it did.
Posted by cable
Member since Oct 2018
9635 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 3:01 pm to
the problem was they didn't go far enough with the feminist stuff - they should have had HQ peg the Joker in front of his gay lover.
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28026 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 3:25 pm to
yeah, i'd be afraid of them in a fight.


fricking Hollywood is such garbage
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30856 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 3:39 pm to
The trailers didn't do it any favors. They were very... unappealing.

I didn't chose to not see it because I'm against female led movies. I chose not to see it because I didn't feel compelled to after seeing the trailers.

It might be a good movie, it might not be.

That said, there are enough adult women in the US that if a movie pulled them in, it'd be successful without a large percentage of men seeing it. If you had a date who wanted to see it, you'd probably go - I mean, hell, I went on a date and she wanted to see Twilight. Guys will put up with way worse than Birds of Prey if someone they like wants to see it.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30856 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Also Harley Quinn without The Joker is not very interesting.


Not true - in the comics, she's been plenty successful without him.

THAT SAID - she is usually WAY better playing off of another protagonist who is generally the calm half of the duo. Poison Ivy and Harley Quinn is a really damned good duo, and the animated show is 1000x better than the movie because Harley's frantic nature is played off of Ivy's no nonsense personality.

What they should have done is had Harley and Joker to start (A NEW JOKER - Leto sucks balls), then branch off as she realizes she doesn't need him. Befriending Ivy along the way. Third act is either them pulling a heist together (make it a super-powered heist movie) or becoming anti-heroes, like Punisher.
Posted by skrayper
21-0 Asterisk Drive
Member since Nov 2012
30856 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Funniest part of this is that Jeremy Jahns and Screen Rant (Pitch Meetings) said they would have loved to see a movie about The Huntress and her story (based on what was gleaned from BOP)


Well, that her backstory was way more interesting. It gets lip service in the movie, and that's it.

Huntress in the JLU animated series was a complex and very interesting character.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36012 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 4:30 pm to
The movie was never marketed as some feminist epic. Other than the word "emancipation", the trailers and commercials were about Harley leaving Joker and joining women who had a common threat.

Everyone lost their shite because McGregor (who only did the movie to be near his young girlfriend) decided to show off in an interview by making the movie seem more important than it is. The writer didn't write it that way. The director didn't direct it that way. The movie didn't end up that way. But McGregor had a grander SJW vision than the film's creators.

Was the movie marketed badly, named badly, and created for the wrong rating? Yes.

Is it an anti-male feminist manifesto worthy of either side getting upset over? No.

SPOILERS:

*******************

Seriously: SPOILERS

**********************

How are the female characters mistreated by men?

-Harley breaks up with Joker. Once people find out she's no longer under Joker's protection, she's open game for everyone she's mistreated in the past.

-Montoya is shite on by all of the cops in her precinct. They laugh at her for being a professional cop. Her sex isn't mentioned, but it's obvious that it's part of it.

-Black Canary gets a promotion based on her talents. No mistreatment.

-Huntress is orphaned by bad men, saved by a good man, and raised by good men.

-Cassandra is a pickpocket who picks the wrong pocket. No mistreatment.

ETA: There's also a scene where a guy tries to take advantage of a drunk Harley and Canary kicks his arse. That's about the only "sex" in the entire thing.


END SPOILERS:

*******************
Is every man in this film bad? No. But the entire film is about villains VS villains. Like 90% of movies, the villains are male bad guys.

I can understand not wanting to see it based on the marketing, but avoiding it because of one interview out of a hundred or because it has women battling male bad guys is lame.

This post was edited on 2/11/20 at 4:40 pm
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40775 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 4:47 pm to
Maybe since Jussie Smollett's sister is in the movie. She can set up an arse whipping to garner the movie some attention. Since they are blaming the movies failure on men, and their dicks. Mind as well throw a racial arse beating in there to top it off.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

and feminists are blaming sexism



The evidence of which was one tweet and the words of one comic book nerd.

God damn people lap this shite up on here.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7489 posts
Posted on 2/11/20 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

The trailers didn't do it any favors. They were very... unappealing.



this.

saw them and told my wife “this movie is going to suck”

she agreed with me and we aren’t going to pay to go watch it.

we did pay to see Wonder Woman, and will likely pay to see Black Widow as well.
so it literally has nothing to do with the lead being female.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram