Started By
Message

re: US Women’s Soccer Players Protest During National Anthem

Posted on 3/12/20 at 6:35 pm to
Posted by ProfFrink
Springfield
Member since Nov 2018
3407 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

The protest had nothing to do with the country or politics, rather protesting the USSF after they released a tone-deaf press release that basically say women are losers


This. USSF released a horrible press release that has been and deserved to get blasted. The women’s team had every right to not want to wear the USSF crest before the game.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150140 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

USSF released a horrible press release that has been and deserved to get blasted
I cant get over the hostile crowd part
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 6:36 pm to
She’s definitely getting more masculine looking by the day - she was cute 6 years ago or so
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66973 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

cant get over the hostile crowd part


Why? Men play in way worse environments
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 7:00 pm
Posted by Bamafan24
Huntsville
Member since Oct 2014
9190 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 7:40 pm to
Want to get paid like them mean then just identify as them and play on the same field as them. problem solved
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
30763 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 7:52 pm to
Again, they got whipped by 15 year old boys.

Not a select team of best 15 year olds in America, just a team of 15 year olds for a texas youth team.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 7:54 pm to
My sister was outraged over the entire thing even though THEY MADE MORE MONEY THAN THE MEN and both are collectively bargained.

I have an easy answer, eliminate "Mens" and "Womens" teams and have them all compete for one truly equal pay scale.

After reading the statement, woof they may have gone a tad too far. It's one thing to say they can't compete on the same level, it's another to just make asinine arguments like more hostile crowds. Hell, I did enjoy they basically said the men are shittier compared to their peers though.
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 7:59 pm
Posted by BCLA
Bossier City
Member since Mar 2005
9057 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

 cant get over the hostile crowd part

I'm trying to figure out what you think is so funny? The statement, why terrible, is true.

The mens team get pelted with piss balloons, batteries, beer bottles when playing in Central America/islands.

There's a reason Azteka in Mexico City has chain link fence and barbed wire in all the levels of the stadium. Our men's team probably plays in more hostile conditions than any other sports team in the World.

For the record, I'm now rooting for the women to win based on how tone deaf the statement was. That statement may finally bring down the leadership that all US soccer fans have been hoping for.
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 8:04 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150140 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 8:03 pm to
I'm not saying it is or isnt true, it's just funny and a ridiculous point to make
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 8:04 pm
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 8:04 pm to
Women are coddled by society more than any other group of people and yet they labor under the delusion they are the most persecuted. It's utter madness.
Posted by BCLA
Bossier City
Member since Mar 2005
9057 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 8:05 pm to
Gotcha. I know you hate soccer, so I wasn't sure if you were thinking the statement was rediculous (it is) or that anything soccer would be considered hostile.
Posted by Chef Curry
Member since Mar 2019
3107 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 9:18 pm to
Jackass, the pay scales are driven by revenues. People don’t spend the money to attend female sporting events, buying team gear, etc. This is like saying a mechanic at Walmart should make the same as a mechanic at a chemical plant.
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9503 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 10:01 pm to
There are literally only 12-15 countries in the world that are legitimate in women’s soccer. They expanded the field in the last women’s cup, and I think it was Thailand who we played. We beat them like 14-0. It was an embarrassment. THAT is the biggest difference between the men’s and women. The women beat the 16th best country in the world 14-0. In men’s the #1 team could play the #100 ranked team in the world and it would never be that bad. They say the women “win”...well of course they do, 75% of the world doesn’t even have women’s soccer. Also, the men’s and women’s World Cup revenue isn’t even in the same universe. The USWNT is becoming unbareable. They earn exactly what they’re worth!!
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 10:02 pm
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
12284 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 10:11 pm to
She is a strong woman and I applaud her efforts for women's rights. I especially applaud when she tells women who wear hijabs to quit their oppressive culture, risk their lives by ripping them off, and getting a Zack Morris like her
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8441 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 10:20 pm to
Tony Kornheiser had the correct take.

The player are under collective bargaining contract until 2021(?ish) and the USSF should have simply stated that they don’t change contracts agreed to by the players.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66973 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

not saying it is or isnt true, it's just funny and a ridiculous point to make


Well if part of the argument is they perform different jobs then the men having to play in hostile environments supports that.
Posted by Boo Krewe
Member since Apr 2015
9810 posts
Posted on 3/12/20 at 11:48 pm to
alex morgan is rich because of endorsements

but arent usmnt and uswnt comparable in attendance
etter analogy is a roadie making more at a jazz band or drake
This post was edited on 3/12/20 at 11:50 pm
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13500 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 12:08 am to
quote:

On one side, the women win more and I believe they generate more revenue.


No they don't. You simply bought their BS spin. They love to conveniently forget that the USSF pays their freaking Club salaries, but not for the men. They also get health coverage where as the men don't. They get a base salary of $100,000 a year, but the men only get bonuses based on when they play/train.

They love to claim they bring in more revenue but choose to pick the range for the year the men don't make the World Cup to bolster their argument.

It's such bullshite and embarrassing. Give them equal pay, but cut the benefits like the guaranteed salary, paying their club salaries and their healthcare. Let the league deal with their salaries instead of subsidizing that crap.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115415 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 6:28 am to
USSF should forfeit the matches and disband the team.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79428 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 7:22 am to
quote:

They love to claim they bring in more revenue but choose to pick the range for the year the men don't make the World Cup to bolster their argument.


It’s pretty relevant considering that happens often.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram