- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ryan Clark demands Shadeur be named the backup or that the browns trade him
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:14 am to lsufball19
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:14 am to lsufball19
quote:
Shadeur is more likely to get cut than traded.
“We are granting Ryan Clark’s request and parting ways with Shedeur Sanders. He has been released.”
0
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:17 am to High C
quote:
Serious question, has he ever gone to bat like this for a non-black player?
Tebow definitely had outsized coverage compared to his ability, it was a different tone than the Sanders attention though, which comes across as resentful entitlement.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:20 am to Fun Bunch
Who watches this crap? STOP watching these idiots & giving them ratings.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:23 am to Hetfield
quote:
Who watches this crap? STOP watching these idiots & giving them ratings.
I think a lot of people see this stuff based on their social media algorithms. I don't watch any non live sporting events on ESPN, yet these types of clips show up on my feeds all the time because most of the content I follow is sports related.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:25 am to Fun Bunch
I hate Ryan Clark. I hate that he went to lsu. Watching it I don’t really disagree with most of what he’s saying and “demands” is misleading. It’s a circus and if you don’t have plans for him it’s probably not worth having him on your team. I highly doubt anyone trades for him though.
This post was edited on 10/10/25 at 10:29 am
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:26 am to Fun Bunch
This is something that’s becoming more pervasive especially with ESPN people where they’re ordering pro teams to do what they want them to do. It’s bizarre and completely out of bounds
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:26 am to Fun Bunch
frick Ryan Clark
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:28 am to LSUlefty
quote:
Trade for what? Every team passed on him 5 times.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:35 am to Fun Bunch
Well, if he isn’t the starter then isn’t he by default a backup? I don’t recall many teams making an announcement about who precisely is 2nd string.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:36 am to St Augustine
quote:
Watching it I don’t really disagree with most of what he’s saying and “demands” is misleading. It’s a circus and if you don’t have plans for him it’s probably not worth having him on your team.
Yeah I can't stand RC but it actually sounds like he was saying if you ain't going to use him, then get the headache out of your locker room. I agree with that.
The part that's left out of this whole deal is that Stefanski likely never wanted him to begin with. They had already drafted Gabriel. Haslam and/or the GM brought in a player the head coach didn't want or need. I'm speculating, but it seems obvious.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:38 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Ryan Clark
Cut this guy loose already.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:43 am to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
Well, if he isn’t the starter then isn’t he by default a backup? I don’t recall many teams making an announcement about who precisely is 2nd string.
The choice is warm shite or cold shite but at least the cold shite, Zappe, has regular season experience.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 10:56 am to Fun Bunch
Imagine still letting RC trigger you in the big two five.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:03 am to teke184
quote:
A conditional 7th in 2027 and some extra balls?
A ham sandwich and half of a toenail clipping.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:11 am to Fun Bunch
If he leaves the Browns no team is going to sign him. He'll be Tebow all over again. Except Tebow actually could win games.
Does Ryan Clark want him unemployed?
Does Ryan Clark want him unemployed?
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:14 am to Fun Bunch
Very funny that this board's blind hatred of Clark is preventing all of you from understanding that this is the correct take.
Why employ a guy to run the practice squad who's going to do nothing but cause division in the locker room and invite a media circus?
Why employ a guy to run the practice squad who's going to do nothing but cause division in the locker room and invite a media circus?
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:16 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:Why reward the bum arse, controversial player by releasing him for potentially bad behavior?
Why employ a guy to run the practice squad who's going to do nothing but cause division in the locker room and invite a media circus?
Keep his arse on practice squad.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:19 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:
Very funny that this board's blind hatred of Clark is preventing all of you from understanding that this is the correct take. Why employ a guy to run the practice squad who's going to do nothing but cause division in the locker room and invite a media circus?
Yeah RC has rubbed me the wrong way the last 6 months or so but it's pretty clear he is saying, decide if he's more trouble thans he worth and if he is move on.
That's just sound football advice for a 5th round pick.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:19 am to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
Well, if he isn’t the starter then isn’t he by default a backup? I don’t recall many teams making an announcement about who precisely is 2nd string.
quote:Lamar Jackson named backup over Robert Griffin III
Roll Tide Ravens
Look I get that everyone hates Sanders and Clark, but the cognitive dissonance that comes with every discussion surrounding them is exhausting.
The browns QB1 is hurt. They signed a 40 year old Flacco and drafted 2 high profile rookies. They traded the 40 year old. They named one of the high profile rookies the starter. Now the other high profile rookie is on the roster and people want to know he's QB2 or QB3. If he's QB3, it means he will never have a spot in the org and it's stupid for Cleveland to invite everything that comes with Sanders (as Clark said) into the locker room if he's never going to play.
Posted on 10/10/25 at 11:20 am to PP7 for heisman
quote:
Why employ a guy to run the practice squad who's going to do nothing but cause division in the locker room and invite a media circus?
I see you all are focusing on this point.
That is not the correct take. RC's actual point is that Shadeur SHOULD be starting but Stefanski "don't mess with him"
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News