Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Rule Change that makes sense

Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:08 am
Posted by champj3
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
374 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:08 am
After any first down made by the offense, use the 25 sec play clock option rather then the 40 sec rolling play clock. Meaning wait until the ball is spotted by the ref and chains set and then run the 25 sec play clock. This is used after a penalty already and other dead ball situations.

The benefit, it would allow the team to actually celebrate a chunk play and not have to call timeout because their team couldn't get downfield and set for the next play in time.

I've seen it many times where the QB is just breaking huddle and raises his arm asking for a fresh 40 sec and the ref denies the request and results in a timeout. This takes all the momentum away from the team that just earned it.

Easy change to the rule and it would help the flow.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
McKinney, TX
Member since Mar 2014
13966 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:21 am to
Allow hand fighting contact downfield for the DB and receiver. Take away the low hit penalty on hitting the QB in the pocket. And takeaway the 3 yd cushion for lineman on passing plays, and make it 1 yd of line of scrimmage.
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
4218 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:21 am to
quote:

it would allow the team to actually celebrate a chunk play
they can celebrate after the drive. your reasoning is crap.
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
58312 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:23 am to
The auto ejection for targeting has to go

Should be classified as a personal foul where it takes 2 infractions to get tossed. Whit was talking ab this recently and I completely agree with him there.

For him to be ejected 3 plays into the Florida game was completely ridiculous.
Posted by USAFTiger42
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2016
3915 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:29 am to
Either that or no more than a quarter unless you do it again after you sit out THEN a game suspension make sense.
Posted by champj3
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
374 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:29 am to
CRAP?!?! FUK OFF
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45186 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:32 am to
You think stopping the game so a team can celebrate a non-scoring play will help the flow of the game?
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
19628 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 7:41 am to
quote:

After any first down made by the offense, use the 25 sec play clock option rather then the 40 sec rolling play clock. Meaning wait until the ball is spotted by the ref and chains set and then run the 25 sec play clock. This is used after a penalty already and other dead ball situations.

Getting a first down isn’t a dead ball situation.
quote:

The benefit, it would allow the team to actually celebrate a chunk play and not have to call timeout because their team couldn't get downfield and set for the next play in time.

I’ll be honest, I don’t really care if guys have time to celebrate every first down.
quote:

I've seen it many times where the QB is just breaking huddle and raises his arm asking for a fresh 40 sec and the ref denies the request and results in a timeout. This takes all the momentum away from the team that just earned it.

Sounds like they need to be more efficient or have better clock management skills.
quote:

Easy change to the rule and it would help the flow.

How would it help the flow? In my opinion, having guys actually play football instead of celebrate after every first down helps the flow of the game.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 7:43 am
Posted by geauxtigers810
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2004
588 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 8:00 am to
This would have the opposite effect that you think it would. Chains are typically reset in 5-10 seconds which would result in 30-35 seconds between plays instead of the 40 and allow less time for your wanted celebrations.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7940 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 8:06 am to
quote:


The auto ejection for targeting has to go

Should be classified as a personal foul where it takes 2 infractions to get tossed. Whit was talking ab this recently and I completely agree with him there.

For him to be ejected 3 plays into the Florida game was completely ridiculous.



Alabama vs. Texas 2009 - YouTube Replay of Colt McCoy hit
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49985 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 8:07 am to
How about players learn not to celebrate excessive to the point that they cannot get lined up for next play.
Posted by Yeti_Chaser
Member since Nov 2017
13319 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 9:53 am to
Get rid of targeting and make the players sign a waiver. Don't want to get hit, go play soccer. I was watching highlights from the 2009 saints superbowl team last night and was reminded how much more fun football was when it was played by a bunch of mean hard hitting dudes rather than the pansies that make up today's game
Posted by ThreeYYYz
Member since Feb 2025
271 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I was watching highlights from the 2009 saints superbowl team last night and was reminded how much more fun football was when it was played by a bunch of mean hard hitting dudes rather than the pansies that make up today's game


The game is evolving yes, but if you think for a second that this is not still a very violent game, you my friend have not been close enough. RB and LB meeting in the gap is still a very violent affair. You may not see replays of the hit over and over, but it is still violent. There are no pansies playing high level football, argue with a wall.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
22006 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:29 pm to
If neither a defender nor offensive players helmets are at the center of the collision, launching should be allowed. Bring back the spear, but with rules. Let them launch a shoulder into the back or ribs of receivers.

I miss decleating hits in the middle of the field and these pansy WRs these days need to get put in their place.
Posted by NotStupid
Member since Jul 2026
28 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:34 pm to
Make pass interference a reviewable call. Those calls change games and the fact they aren’t challenged is ridiculous.

I’d also eliminate the running clock when guys run out of bounds. If the clock stops under 5 minutes in the 4th Q when you do that then make that the rule all game
Posted by lsusa
Doing Missionary work for LSU
Member since Oct 2005
6358 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

The auto ejection for targeting has to go Should be classified as a personal foul where it takes 2 infractions to get tossed. Whit was talking ab this recently and I completely agree with him there.


I’d also say add an intentional vs unintentional version of it, with intentional being the immediate ejection.

My only fear is that it would put even more subjectivity in the hands of the refs and replay officials, and we know who it will ultimately benefit.
Posted by BranchDawg
Flowery Branch
Member since Nov 2013
10159 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:49 pm to
Offensive pass interference shouldn’t be a 15-yard penalty. It should be loss of down and 5 yards.

I know the goal is for it to be the same penalty as the defense would suffer, but a 15-yards penalty inherently hurts the offense worse than the defense because 25+ yards to go in a set of downs is almost always insurmountable.
Posted by 62zip
One Particular Harbor
Member since Aug 2005
6974 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

I've seen it many times where the QB is just breaking huddle and raises his arm asking for a fresh 40 sec and the ref denies the request and results in a timeout. This takes all the momentum away from the team that just earned it.



Why should this QB be granted a fresh 40? Of course that wouldn't happen regardless - if there was a reset it would be to 25 rather than 40 anyhow if needed.

How about concentrate on playing football rather than celebrating and then this isn't an issue.
Posted by BayouNation
Member since Sep 2008
2147 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:24 pm to
Take away spot fouls for pass interference. 10 yards and 1st down is fine but 40 yards downfield field is egregious and sometimes is the turning point in a game.
Posted by 62zip
One Particular Harbor
Member since Aug 2005
6974 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Take away spot fouls for pass interference. 10 yards and 1st down is fine but 40 yards downfield field is egregious and sometimes is the turning point in a game.



Are you taking NFL or NCAA? PI in the NCAA is only a spot foul if it occurs less than 15 yards from the previous spot.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 10:29 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram