- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NFL Draft Discussion Thread
Posted on 4/23/26 at 10:34 pm to cajuntiger1010
Posted on 4/23/26 at 10:34 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:
Must be a very weak RB class outside of Love
Can't speak to much of the rest of the class outside the ND kids but in many years in the past, JD Price would have been that ND kid that got all the hype, all the attention and media, non-stop fluffing and criticism, etc. (think Brady Quinn, Clausen, Teo, etc., etc.). He's a quiet dude who was splitting carries with the best RB prospect since Barkley, so he went well, well under the radar, but he is an awesome football player.
There were times last year, especially early in the year, where I thought he was a better pure RB than Love. Not as electric as Love (whom I would compare with Bijan or Darren McFadden), but he is fast as frick, extremely physical, just a great instinctual runner (incredible vision in the backfield - better than Love whose is pretty damn good), very patient and intelligent player, immediate plug and play top 20 in the NFL type of RB. The guy he is replacing in Seattle is actually a great comp - Kenneth Walker-esque. Also a great special teams player which I know Seattle values.
His knock is his penchant for putting it on the ground in big situations. He wasn't below average on a per carry basis by any means, but A) he had a knack for doing it in the highest leverage situations and B) his counterpart put the ball on the ground one single time in his entire college career (and recovered his own fumble, at that), so it will jump out a bit.
A low key big thing for both of them is that they both have light wear on the treads. Their combined amount of carries over the last two years barely eclipses what Jeanty had by himself in his final two years at Boise, for comparison.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 10:43 pm to RB10
As an avid fantasy player, I hate when skill positions get drafted to the Browns. Basically makes him worthless.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 10:51 pm to borotiger
Jeanty went 6 overall last year and is light years better
Than love.
Than love.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 10:51 pm to Marktastic86
quote:Clearly cognitively impaired to some extent, especially given brain tumor removal. Add that he’d also beaten cancer an additional time, who cares? Let him live it up.
God, what an a-hole that guy was
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 11:03 pm to Bronco11
quote:
Jeanty went 6 overall last year and is light years better
Than love.
Not even close. Love is eons better than Jeanty, and that was obvious in 2024.
Jeanty was closer to Jadarian Price with a high usage rate than he was to Love. Nowhere near the speed or quickness that Love has. Love is a once every 5 - 7 year RB type of player along the lines of Barkley, Robinson, McCafferty, McFadden, Henry, Bush, et al, not some G5 foie gras treatment very good-but-not-great RB.
Getting almost 25 carries / game against shite arse defenses in the Mountain West inflated his reputation. Love will end up being by far the better RB and I am 50/50 whether Price will be better than Jeanty. He never did shite against big boy power 4 teams and his first year in the NFL was bad.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 11:09 pm
Posted on 4/23/26 at 11:26 pm to AbuTheMonkey
He had zero online or QB in his first year. Every single grade from NFL scouts had Jeanty as a 7.1+ grade. Love couldn't crack 7. Fact.
Jeanty is also way, way stronger and has elite balance. Loves lower half is questionable at best. Skinny legs.
This is a future, like, 10 year argument but after 1 year in the NFL behind the worst Online in the NFL vs Love, nearly every GM would take Jeanty on durability and balance alone. Not close.
Jeanty is also way, way stronger and has elite balance. Loves lower half is questionable at best. Skinny legs.
This is a future, like, 10 year argument but after 1 year in the NFL behind the worst Online in the NFL vs Love, nearly every GM would take Jeanty on durability and balance alone. Not close.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 11:48 pm to Bronco11
quote:
He had zero online or QB in his first year. Every single grade from NFL scouts had Jeanty as a 7.1+ grade. Love couldn't crack 7. Fact.
Jeanty is also way, way stronger and has elite balance. Loves lower half is questionable at best. Skinny legs.
This is a future, like, 10 year argument but after 1 year in the NFL behind the worst Online in the NFL vs Love, nearly every GM would take Jeanty on durability and balance alone. Not close.
If you think Jeanty is stronger and has better balance than Love, you haven't watched enough of both. Love is a true 5 - 7 year freak in a way Jeanty never was. Getting 25 carries / game against future insurance salesmen will tend to inflate one's perception of a player, but Love was a much better player than Jeanty in '24, and it's not close at this point.
The better comparison is whether Jeanty is better than Price. They are similar-ish players with similar skillsets. That comparison will probably come down to who plays in the better organization over the long term.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:58 am to AbuTheMonkey
The Cardinals really fricked themselves with their first round strategy, and their likely top of 2nd round target got scooped up by a team in the division.
Overall, it feels like this draft lacks true franchise players. An underwhelming choice in an underwhelming year. If the Cards had nobody to trade with they should have gone with someone on defense, so that was surprising. Disappointing? We'll know in 3-4 years.
Overall, it feels like this draft lacks true franchise players. An underwhelming choice in an underwhelming year. If the Cards had nobody to trade with they should have gone with someone on defense, so that was surprising. Disappointing? We'll know in 3-4 years.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 7:36 am to Translator
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:23 am to AbuTheMonkey
Idk man, I drafted Jeanty in fantasy so I watched him when I could. He had NOTHING to work with and would still come off as very impressive.
Looked like what T Rich was supposed to be.
With space, I could see him being a top 3 RB in the league type.
Looked like what T Rich was supposed to be.
With space, I could see him being a top 3 RB in the league type.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 8:25 am to lsupride87
I mean, it was a pretty insane pick. Yeah you want your QB for the future but they were just in the NFC-CG with a good chance to win.
Your HOF QB has 1-2 years left so why not try and win now? That's been the Rams entire model since Stafford trade.
Baffling pick.
Your HOF QB has 1-2 years left so why not try and win now? That's been the Rams entire model since Stafford trade.
Baffling pick.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 9:59 am to metallica81788
Stafford might be done after this season there were talks he might hang it up after last season so I don't think it's that crazy to take your QB now and let him learn behind a guy like Stafford. Same thing Raiders are doing with Mendoza by signing Cousins to start early on and mentor until ready.
I actually hope this is a more consistent change we see going forward where teams don't rush rookie QB's into starting week 1.
I actually hope this is a more consistent change we see going forward where teams don't rush rookie QB's into starting week 1.
This post was edited on 4/24/26 at 10:01 am
Posted on 4/24/26 at 11:55 am to The Pirate King
quote:
For your comparison, the last two receivers drafted in the top five were Ja'Marr Chase and Malik Nabers. Is Tate anywhere near those two? Hell no
Well MHJr was taken 4th and Nabers was taken 6th
WTF are you even talking about?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:57 pm to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 4/24/26 at 4:42 pm to UnluckyTiger
A lot of columnists are criticizing the Vikings pick of the DLman. Although, that was a reach, the only major issue I had was the Rams going with a QB.
Typically, I say, "If that's you're guy, draft him. Dont worry what any other team thinks". However, when you're THAT close to the super bowl, why are you not going with the extra boost that can put you over the top and not a pick that will come in fruition years from now. Their time is now.
I also think it was a reach as well. Simpson's size and the losses to Oklahoma and Indiana concern me. Walter Football claimed Simpson wasnt a lock to start next season at Alabama if he decided to return. Can any direhard Alabama fans confirm this? But, the vast majority of the issue I have with this selection is the position, not the player.
Typically, I say, "If that's you're guy, draft him. Dont worry what any other team thinks". However, when you're THAT close to the super bowl, why are you not going with the extra boost that can put you over the top and not a pick that will come in fruition years from now. Their time is now.
I also think it was a reach as well. Simpson's size and the losses to Oklahoma and Indiana concern me. Walter Football claimed Simpson wasnt a lock to start next season at Alabama if he decided to return. Can any direhard Alabama fans confirm this? But, the vast majority of the issue I have with this selection is the position, not the player.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 5:00 pm to BigD43
Perhaps a year of learning as the backup can prepare him for a post-Stafford situation in LA. Had the Cards gotten him in R2 instead, it's still the Cards. Strategic to get him before AZ could, so now you have two teams with question marks at future QB instead of 1 and the division doormat has to scramble to find someone.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:19 pm to Bronco11
These nfl players can’t read
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:20 pm to Macintosh
That was tough. The pause and still got the year wrong by a decade.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 6:23 pm to dawgdayafternoon
So talent at Clemson ain't the problem. 3 top 35 picks... And at key positions like OL & DL.
And they still sucked.
And they still sucked.
Popular
Back to top


0









