Started By
Message

re: Lebron would absolutely roast these nerds

Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:59 pm to
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28955 posts
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:59 pm to
"I'm gonna post one play of a 16 year career. That'll win this argument"
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
65830 posts
Posted on 3/11/25 at 10:10 pm to
They always do this. Last week one of em posted a single sloppy possession to try and prove that the NBA was dogshit in the 90s as if there’s not a video from a couple years ago with a player taking 12 steps from a stationary position or another one with a player just walking with the ball nearly halfway up the court. These people are jerkoffs, pretending to be experts on something they’ve never witnessed and know next to nothing about.
This post was edited on 3/11/25 at 10:11 pm
Posted by BhamDore
Nashville
Member since Aug 2009
6475 posts
Posted on 3/11/25 at 10:28 pm to
Lebron averaged 27 ppg as a 19 year old and 31 ppg as a 20 year old.

You are misremembering.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
65830 posts
Posted on 3/11/25 at 10:51 pm to
He averaged 22ppg on 35% shooting and 20% from 3 against the defenders I mentioned in the 07 finals and maybe it’s you who’s misremembering…

Lebron age 19- 20.9ppg
Lebron age 20- 27.2ppg
Posted by KCRoyalBlue
Member since Nov 2020
1844 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 12:23 am to
Air Jordan would ever-so-lightly drag his GOAT nuts across the bridge of LeFake's nose as he posterized him night after night taking off from the foul line.

Yeah, I crammed all that into one sentence, much like Mike cramming 60 points down the throat of today's soft, load management NBA.

Today's players couldn't dream of managing MJ's load.
This post was edited on 3/12/25 at 4:14 pm
Posted by slutiger5
Parroquias de Florida
Member since May 2007
11759 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 12:36 am to
Mj would shut down the opposing guard\wing threat. Then he would casually slice the lane or shoot an effortless mid range dagger, possession after possession.

LeBron wouldn’t suit for that game.
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 1:03 am to
quote:

No doubt, it’s Larry Bird…

Poor mans Jokic.

In all seriousness, Jokic is what Bird would look like in the modern NBA, though I think Jokic is more talented.
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
42222 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 1:27 am to
That was better defense than LeBron has ever faced.
Posted by ChestRockwell
In the heart of horse country
Member since Jul 2021
6845 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 2:17 am to
MJ never lost in a finals
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
135082 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 5:06 am to
There is something wrong with you LeBron apologists
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88412 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 5:42 am to
quote:

That was better defense than LeBron has ever faced.
Why say something this stupid?
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31253 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 6:14 am to
quote:

The argument of NBA defenses being tougher back in the day is wild

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. When were you born? Did you actually watch the game prior to 2010? Did you see Hack-A-Shaq? I’m not even going to go back to the 90s or 80s. The physicalness of guys like Rodman and Barkley and Ewing.

I swear some of yall say this shite just to get a rise out of people and every once in a while the hook is just too shiny.
Posted by SulphursFinest
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2015
11171 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 6:27 am to
Hack a Shaq was elite defense? Making someone who sucks at free throws shoot free throws?!?

Nothing elite about that.

Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:04 am to
quote:

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. When were you born? Did you actually watch the game prior to 2010? Did you see Hack-A-Shaq? I’m not even going to go back to the 90s or 80s. The physicalness of guys like Rodman and Barkley and Ewing.

I swear some of yall say this shite just to get a rise out of people and every once in a while the hook is just too shiny

Fouling isnt good defense. It's by definition bad defense.

Yes you had more players committing hard, dirty fouls. But you are remembering highlights, it isnt like they were doing it every single game or 15 times per night. Teams get a 100+ possessions in a game, taking a hard foul on one of them doesnt stop you from scoring the other 99+ trips down the court.
Posted by longhorn22
Nicholls St. Fan
Member since Jan 2007
42880 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:39 am to
quote:

MJ would be a mid Demar Derozan in today's game


Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
10773 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:43 am to
quote:

[LeBron] was an embarrassment to the league

Typically, yes.

He's clearly a phenomenal, generational talent, but he paradoxically has the power to tune casual eyeballs away from his league. That alone takes a legendary level of will that I doubt will ever be matched.

MJ was a must-see event; LeBron is a "nah I would but I got better things to do" event. In the end, that's what will seal MJ as basketball's GOAT.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107808 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 7:45 am to
quote:

He's clearly a phenomenal, generational talent, but he paradoxically has the power to tune casual eyeballs away from his league.


When LeBron was in his prime and making finals the nba was rolling.

Just big cowinky dink as he aged and his teams stopped making finals that viewership declined eh?

This board is a shining example. NBA playoffs used to be fire here when Lebron was making runs
This post was edited on 3/12/25 at 7:46 am
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
29633 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

What is this defense? Only 1 guy can be on MJ’s side of the court?



Correct. No different than it is today. YOu do realize that the current nba doesn't allow you to play help side defense either unless you are going double. It's called illegal defense dumbass. You can't just sit in the lane and not defend your guy. It's been this way for decades.

Posted by longhorn22
Nicholls St. Fan
Member since Jan 2007
42880 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:16 am to
Negative. You are wrong. Quite funny they put an end to this after the "90s" era..

In the NBA, the concept of "illegal defense" primarily refers to the period when zone defenses were banned, which lasted until the 2001-2002 season, meaning that playing a zone defense was considered illegal during that time; this is when the "illegal defense" rule was most prominent in the league.

Key points about illegal defense in the NBA:

Zone defense ban:
The NBA prohibited zone defenses for a significant period, which meant teams had to primarily play man-to-man defense.

Rule change in 2001:
The league lifted the zone defense ban before the 2001-2002 season, allowing teams to play zone defense legally.

Defensive three-second violation:
When the zone defense ban was lifted, the NBA added a "defensive three-second violation" rule to prevent defenders from simply camping in the paint.
Posted by longhorn22
Nicholls St. Fan
Member since Jan 2007
42880 posts
Posted on 3/12/25 at 8:19 am to
Current Rule:
A defensive three-second violation is a basketball rules infraction in the National Basketball Association (NBA), which was added prior to the 2001–2002 season in conjunction with the removal of previous illegal defense rules prohibiting zone defenses.[1] It is assessed when a member of the defending team spends more than three seconds in the free throw lane (also called the key, the 16-foot lane, or "the paint") while not actively guarding an opponent. To be considered actively guarding an opponent, a defender must be within arm's length of an opponent and must be in a guarding position. A violation will not be called if an offensive player is in the act of shooting, if the offensive team loses control of the ball, if it is imminent that the defender's position will become legal, or if the defender is guarding a player who has possession of the ball.[2]

The team committing a defensive three-second violation is assessed a team technical foul. The offense receives one free throw and retains possession of the ball.[2]

The NBA also made zone defenses legal prior to the 2001–2002 season.[3] The introduction of zone defenses faced resistance from players, including Michael Jordan. If teams were able to play zone defenses, he said, he never would have had the career he did.[4] Other great players, such as Tim Duncan, Kevin Garnett, and Tracy McGrady have also confirmed that zone defenses made scoring more difficult compared to the 1990s NBA. [5] The defensive three-second violation rule made it a little more difficult for teams to play zone, since such defenses usually position a player in the middle of the key to stop penetration, but teams adapted by teaching bigs to quickly exit and re-enter the paint, and by running schemes that legally reset the three-second timer.[6] Scoring has increased substantially since the introduction of zone defense.[7]

The WNBA adopted its own defensive three-second rule in 2013.[8]

The rule is not used in the FIBA ruleset.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram