- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you really believe the SEC would kick LSU out? MSB edition
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:49 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:49 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Finebaum said LSU would eventually back down when pressed enough.
That's because he works for the SEC Network and has been told the SEC's gameplan here by the SEC.
0
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:50 pm to DMagic
quote:
None he challenged the NCAA medical redshirt waiver and the SEC definitely doesn't want to wade into that mess
Correct
As I said
quote:
That is a different scenario.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:50 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I thought we were just trolling LSU fans with this.
I can’t believe this is even halfway serious.
The SEC needs LSU and should be proud to have them.
You have some bitch leaders involved making the situation personal rather than properly doing their jobs.
And when it comes to athlete eligibility, they have been grossly incompetent for many years.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What direct association with any pro team did he ever have?
This is about breaking SEC rules. Playing ineligible players is against the rules.
quote:
Have we?
What rule has LSU broken?
Be specific.
quote:
No, they petition the court to get a federal court to rule that they had the authority to enforce their rules for people who broke them.
It includes a restraining order to prevent LSU from counter suing.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:52 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:100%
The SEC needs LSU and should be proud to have them.
This whole situation is wild.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is a different scenario
It's actually worse. There is at least logical reasoning behind contesting the after the fact 5 for 5 rule change.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:53 pm to RB10
quote:
This is about breaking SEC rules. Playing ineligible players is against the rules
But he's not ineligible
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:54 pm to DMagic
quote:
But he's not ineligible
Yes, he is. The only reason the NCAA can’t act is because of a restraining order that is currently being appealed.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:56 pm to RB10
Which was appealed to the Supreme Court and lost again. When it gets heard the NCAA will lose yet again because of their own uneven enforcement. He's eligible.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:57 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:We have a compliance officer as commissioner listening to academics in university presidents
I thought we were just trolling LSU fans with this. I can’t believe this is even halfway serious. The SEC needs LSU and should be proud to have them.
It’s a disaster in the SEC
Notice the ADs aren’t saying retarded shite? But the problem is they don’t have the power
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:58 pm to DMagic
quote:
Which was appealed to the Supreme Court and lost again. When it gets heard the NCAA will lose yet again because of their own uneven enforcement. He's eligible.
Wrong again. The appeal for Chambliss hasn’t been heard yet.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:59 pm to RB10
quote:
This is about breaking SEC rules
You're trying to change my argument
Also I'm pretty sure his case was with the NCAA not SEC
quote:
What rule has LSU broken?
Why are you trying to change my argument for the 2nd time in a single post?
quote:
It includes a restraining order to prevent LSU from counter suing
What are the specifics? Isn't it just to prevent LSU from going back to State Court for another injunction using state law? That's the very mechanism that was used by the players to try to prevent the SEC from enforcing its rules. It's kind of important to remove that from the equation to permit the SEC to enforce their rules
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:59 pm to RB10
So the Supreme didn't happen? News to me
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The SEC has only actually threatened LSU if they break the rule (and roster the players).
The literally put in their pleading it doesn’t matter if we roster them or not
(Don’t know why the image not showing
LINK
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:04 pm to Fun Bunch
And Alabama
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:04 pm to Adam Banks
That doesn't specifically say they're going to punish us if we don't roster them.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:05 pm to lsupride87
I haven’t paid too much attention but I was hoping we were in a Mexican standoff where LSU was digging in due to pride(possibly rightfully so) and the SEC was pushing back to protect future leverage or something.
As in, the SEC thinks LSU winning this thing would make future situations(whatever they might be) harder to navigate.
Now we have folks seriously talking about booting LSU from the league. Both sides need to chill.
As in, the SEC thinks LSU winning this thing would make future situations(whatever they might be) harder to navigate.
Now we have folks seriously talking about booting LSU from the league. Both sides need to chill.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
It’s about having the power to kick LSU out of the SEC because we might break a rule.
You think expelling a member isn’t punishment?
You think expelling a member isn’t punishment?
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's the very mechanism that was used by the players to try to prevent the SEC from enforcing its rules. It's kind of important to remove that from the equation to permit the SEC to enforce their rules
AG Murrill said on Mascona today that, as far as she knows, no one named in the federal lawsuit is even contemplating an attempt to halt any SEC member meetings on Thursday. I think the conference should be able to do it… I just don’t think an expulsion is warranted.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 5:09 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
I haven’t paid too much attention but I was hoping we were in a Mexican standoff where LSU was digging in due to pride(possibly rightfully so) and the SEC was pushing back to protect future leverage or something.
As in, the SEC thinks LSU winning this thing would make future situations(whatever they might be) harder to navigate.
Now we have folks seriously talking about booting LSU from the league.
Your thoughts are correct. Nobody is really trying to kick LSU out of the SEC as of today.
The realistic scenario for a nuclear response against LSU this year is banning them from the SECCG, which basically would remove them from playoff contention vicariously. Something like THAT could happen this year.
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News