Started By
Message

re: The Average Retirement Savings By Age

Posted on 4/30/26 at 2:06 pm to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95524 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

This is where the "lottery" thing comes apart in my view.


I don't want folks to think I was necessarily advocating that viewpoint, just that I can understand it. Coincidence of birth year resulted in different outcomes for the 2 guys in my example. That part I understand.

But, conditions change on the ground all the time and one has to adapt or die. It is the defining feature of humanity.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110856 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

But, conditions change on the ground all the time and one has to adapt or die. It is the defining feature of humanity.


This is mostly what I was getting at. I understand there my be circumstances where it is impossible, but I'm assuming for the majority of people, they could in any number of ways to alleviate something truly catastrophic.
Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1335 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Meh. The first 5 years of requirement are absolutely critical to long-term retirement success. I love ya, but if I have to explain that on the Money Board...


Very true! Best to plan for / mitigate it. Cash (equivalents) and / or cash flow (SS, annuity, pension)

Do (action plan) > Done to me (birthdate)

Chit works!

Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
19993 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Basically most people save nothing


What this really means is those of us that have been intentional with our retirement savings are going to be targets for everyone else.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54680 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

last 25 years have proven retirement savings plans are less about structure and more about being a birthdate lottery.


You must not be saving
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4890 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

He's selling low with no opportunity to buy back lower and then sell when it goes back up.
I'm retired, but my investing philosophy allows me to buy back lower. For example, at the end of Q1 this year I bought six figures of TQQQ for $43.XX. It closed at $63.54 today. Not bad for a month of just waiting.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95524 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

I'm retired, but my investing philosophy allows me to buy back lower. For example, at the end of Q1 this year I bought six figures of TQQQ for $43.XX. It closed at $63.54 today. Not bad for a month of just waiting.


And fair enough for folks with OT and Money Board money - but please remember, there are folks out there for whom that retirement savings (401k, Roth, etc.) is the main engine of their retirement income. They're planning on taking 4 to 5%, every year, rain or shine. If they are relying on that money, they're in a tough spot in a down year, particularly the first 5 years of retirement. If that first year is, say, a down 7 to 8 %, they compound it down. They're not going to have a bucket of cash to buy back in after selling. A double loss, in many ways. They lose at the drop and they lose any potential compounding of the loss.

Sure, we all know you need to have a 36 to 60 month reserve when you go into retirement so that doesn't happen to us. Not everyone has that luxury.
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 3:47 pm
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4890 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

there are folks out there for whom that retirement savings (401k, Roth, etc.) is the main engine of their retirement income
All of my retirement funds are in an IRA.
quote:

They're planning on taking 4 to 5%, every year, rain or shine.
I take 6.5% as a floor.
quote:

They're not going to have a bucket of cash to buy back in after selling.
Again, it depends on how you invest. You are assuming someone who is retired is investing in a specific way that precludes this.
quote:

Not everyone has that luxury.
It takes discipline and planning. That's it, but you're right that many do not have discipline nor do they plan.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22661 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I don't want folks to think I was necessarily advocating that viewpoint, just that I can understand it. Coincidence of birth year resulted in different outcomes for the 2 guys in my example. That part I understand.

Understood.

The "lottery" suggestion comes across to me like a lot of economic narratives of the day - "you can do all the right things and still end up poor" - which is possible, sure, but pretty rare in this country. I see the lottery thing like I do the "boomers stole our prosperity" nonsense.
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5094 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

You must not be saving


Just the opposite, which is why I honestly believe the lottery comparison. Watching those savings multiply over the last few years has been eye opening, and it’s a streak people will only experience once or twice in their working lives.

Getting that run four years after graduation vs four years before retirement result in massively different outcomes regardless of the individuals’ discipline or sacrifice.
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
14581 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

You seem to have mis-interpreted the meaning of the data

I understand exactly what the data is. But these threads always go the same way.. a bunch of highly educated, successful people talking about how they are above the average or median. As if that means anything when those numbers are so terrible.
Posted by DrrTiger
Gulf of America
Member since Nov 2023
2536 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Getting that run four years after graduation vs four years before retirement result in massively different outcomes regardless of the individuals’ discipline or sacrifice.


Another huge factor is how you're allocated in the last decade of your working years. The conventional advice says I should be heavy into bond funds right now. But I would have missed out on the biggest opportunity for growth that I'll probably ever get.
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5094 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 5:51 pm to
Forced early retirements are going to bite the next generation more than lack of savings. I read this article about people forced to retire earlier than planned the other day and this trend will be far more disruptive than the traditional concerns about trying to calculate when you’ll have enough to retire.

quote:

Factors beyond an individual's control were responsible for 76% of early retirements in 2025, according to EBRI. They included health problems and disabilities, and company changes such as downsizing, closure or reorganization. More than half, 56%, of full-time workers in their early 50s get pushed out of their jobs due to circumstances like a layoff before they're ready to retire



Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1335 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Forced early retirements are going to bite the next generation more than lack of savings.


Agree, I believe RIF risk (incl early retirements) will increase at increasing rate in the future. All the more reason to start investing as soon as possible in one’s working life in cash-generating assets.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36198 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 7:44 am to
quote:

both retired at age 65, the cat born in 1943 ate a ration of poo poo because he got clobbered in 2008 - his first year of retirement set him up for long-term disaster. The guy born in 1948 did/is doing just fine.


Shouldn’t the ‘43 guy have rebalanced before retiring to preserve capital? If you retire and are all in on equity, I’m not sure you were ready to retire.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
33418 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 8:07 am to
quote:

The "lottery" suggestion comes across to me like a lot of economic narratives of the day - "you can do all the right things and still end up poor" - which is possible, sure, but pretty rare in this country. I see the lottery thing like I do the "boomers stole our prosperity" nonsense.

The year of birth lottery is a lot less of a “reason to be poor” but is a big determinant in time of retirement and how much you retire with.

The boomers actually stole our prosperity though. It’s pretty easy to see. You can look at inflation adjusted income over last 30 years, or % of income needed to buy a home over last 30 years - objective statistics. Or the cost of a college degree over last 30 years compared to 1st year of income. Or while less reported, the lack of upward mobility for millennials in corporate America due to boomers delaying retirement and holding down upper management roles for far too long. I can go on.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Vero Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2005
27772 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 11:24 am to
quote:

The boomers actually stole our prosperity though. It’s pretty easy to see.


It may be easy to see, but is it true?

Priorities change, and young folks today believe that everyone needs a newer model car, needs to eat in restaurants 4 or 5x per week, needs expensive vacations, and a house that looks like what their 50+ year old parents live in. They aren't willing to give up any of the other things in order to buy that dream home.

I got the below from a John Stossel podcast that I wrote down and sent to my daughter, who does all of the things I mention in the article, pretty much, and complains that she can't buy a house. She's in her mid-20's and earns 6 figures. Needless to say, she is not getting the sympathy from her old man that she expected. Hey, I was in my early 30's when I bought my first home over 30 years ago. I worked a second job for two years in order to save money up.

• Home ownership rates are higher now than in the past, despite higher home prices. Census data show more Americans own their homes today than ever before

• Today’s homes are bigger and come with more amenities — twice as likely to have central air, dishwashers, and garbage disposals — and young people are willing to pay for them. The problem is that first time home owners don’t want to start with a starter home. They want what their parents live in, even though their parent have already upgraded 2 or 3 times. The average new build home 50 years ago was 1300ish sf. Today, it’s closer to 2300 sf. And it has a lot of bells and whistles that people didn’t have back in the days.

• Young people can afford more now: Americans spend a smaller share of their income on food, clothing, and housing than in previous decades, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data

• Lifestyle improvements: Going out for dinner is now the norm, and travel is far cheaper — adjusted for inflation, a cross-country flight cost $1,000 in the past versus about $300 today. When I was young, we almost never went out to eat, and when we did, we didn’t go someplace that served “gourmet” food. We generally went to what served diner quality food.

• Economic conditions are better: Unemployment is 4.3% today, nearly half what it was when I was young. Gen Z’s average household income is about 50% higher than Baby Boomers’. Interest rates are generally lower, too.

• College affordability is a myth: While college was cheaper in the past, most people didn’t go — roughly half the labor force didn’t even finish high school back when I was young. There is more funding available and not everyone needs to go to an expensive private school

• Cars are different: Yes, families could own a car in the past, but today’s cars are safer, more comfortable, and last longer. Many young people trade in their cars sooner and spend more money on maintaining a new car when they don’t have to.


This post was edited on 5/1/26 at 11:38 am
Posted by 904
BR
Member since Dec 2009
1181 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Priorities change, and young folks today believe that everyone needs a newer model car, needs to eat in restaurants 4 or 5x per week, needs expensive vacations, and a house that looks like what their 50+ year old parents live in.

This is just false. Don't let the outliers and the most visible influence your view on an entire generation.


We're in our early-to-mid 30s and I don't know a single person among our friend group/coworkers that lives like that. The few that do have new cars and nice houses have the income to support it (> $250,000/yr), but they still are fiscally responsible.

As for us, currently driving a reliable 15-year-old vehicle in a 1200 sq foot house with my wife while putting $ in savings and retirement, taking the odd vacation, and eating out maybe once a month on average.
Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1335 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

The boomers actually stole our prosperity though. It’s pretty easy to see.


Read WSJ Did Millenials or Boomers Have It Harder? We Went Searching for the Answer. Apr 11, 2026.

Paywall I suspect so no link. Good article.

I am neither generation. Summary is they are about the same when factoring in some unique negative experiences that each generation experienced that basically offset one another (eg, double digit interest rates of late 70s and early 80s for boomers) during their prime working years).

However, without a doubt Millenials have had much higher education costs to contend with, that is an albatross for Millenials’ early career, unlike Boomers).

Income - Investments = Expenses
(Investments in cash generating assets compounding cash cures many things, inflation in particular).

(1+k)^n your cash > (1+k)^n inflation

Do it! Do it! And do it again! And your prosperity will await you.

Chit works!
This post was edited on 5/1/26 at 1:26 pm
Posted by AaronDeTiger
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2014
2324 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Median isn’t useful either.


I agree. Let's see the numbers that only include people actually saving something.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram