Started By
Message

re: SPCX IPO

Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:47 pm to
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
1713 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 2:47 pm to
100 agreed.
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
19318 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

I also know it is eyewateringly overpriced


They you're gonna make a shite ton shorting it, right?
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51732 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 4:05 pm to
no, why would I do that? I own shares.
it is trading at 100x future projected sales. Can’t look at P/E because it doesn’t have any E

that is overpriced. Doesn’t mean the stock will go down. It means it’s expensive
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
4552 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Either way, at some point this is going to the moon.



For once, this checks out.
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
1713 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 10:27 pm to
LOL
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51732 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 9:29 am to
BREAKING: SpaceX has secured FCC approval for a 15,000-satellite Starlink Mobile constellation, opening a regulatory path to compete directly with AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile.

Granted October 6, the authorization includes a waiver allowing satellite wireless service without a spectrum-leasing agreement with a terrestrial mobile operator.

That gives SpaceX a route beyond providing supplemental coverage through carrier partnerships.

The satellites are authorized for orbits roughly 326–335 kilometers above Earth. SpaceX targets speeds of up to 150 Mbps per user, and the approval covers frequencies SpaceX is acquiring from EchoStar, alongside spectrum used through T-Mobile.

One important condition remains: commercial operations on the EchoStar frequencies must wait for the relevant acquisition closing, scheduled for November 2027. Until then, those frequencies are limited to testing.


starlink is the business. launch is the operating expense
Posted by Neauxla
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
34921 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 9:38 am to
Well that’s not good for my ASTS
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
26602 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas reiterated his $300 price target in a note titled “SPCX $159: Cheap and Getting Cheaper.”


cgrand - It is worth $80.

Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51732 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 10:46 am to
Jesus Christ you all are some snowflakes. Very disappointing
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
25517 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 11:42 am to
quote:


Jesus Christ you all are some snowflakes. Very disappointing


I appreciate a voice of reason

And thanks for that update.

I wasn't aware this was coming down the chute

I will add that I was told a Tesla merger not likely, although he would love to consolidate
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51732 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 12:44 pm to
I think musk himself would prefer a merger it would give him super voting control over TSLA and the combined entity plus would accelerate his $1T plus comp package. The question is whether the mechanism of the merger would put either TSLA or SPCX shareholders at risk.

He can’t lowball the TSLA offer because TSLA shareholders would reject it. At the same time, if he pays the price with SPCX stock it would dilute the SPCX pool. It will be interesting

In other news SPCX is asking Apollo to raise $40B in capital to buy NVDA GPUs. Reactions have been mixed
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
26602 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Jesus Christ you all are some snowflakes


Quoting you and contrasting that with another's opinion is not being a snowflake. Just a counter-point.
Posted by Rabt
Member since Jan 2021
56 posts
Posted on 10/7/26 at 7:49 pm to
Im in at $114.00 $135.00 and $155.



Stats:

LINK
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51732 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 7:39 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Starlink is the business. Everything else is in support of that
Posted by PotatoChip
Member since May 2014
5491 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 8:18 pm to
Do they need some lithium for Starlink or any of the supporting components? Asking for a friend
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
4552 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:36 pm to
That's my main downer on SLI, if it really were the golden goose of lithium, it would already be TeSLI.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
44035 posts
Posted on 10/8/26 at 11:12 pm to
As soon as V3's went operational, this was always the plan.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
69503 posts
Posted on 10/9/26 at 9:02 am to
Another tranche of shares releases tomorrow right? So far, this has rebounded nicely with every release. Considering either upping my position after tomorrow's release, or waiting until all shares are released in December.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51732 posts
Posted on 10/9/26 at 10:31 am to
Musk continues to speculate that SPCX could become more valuable than all other earth companies combined. Obviously that’s aspirational but consider

-a near monopoly on low earth orbit telecommunications and data transfer, making ground based systems and nodes obsolete

-a near monopoly on public discourse and dissemination of information and opinion (twitter)

-a near monopoly on low and high earth orbit launch and delivery

-at least a one-quarter monopoly share of frontier AI models and infrastructure, with the advantage of being tied to a company with actual revenue and profit potential. And shared synergies between all of that communication and data collection universe.

-then look at the robotics technology at TSLA. And the advancement in automated transportation.

in twenty years he may be right. Or we could all be back living in caves.

One more thing that intrigues me is the (sinister?) audacity to keep the messaging from SPCX focused on Mars of all places…a place with no economy and no prospects for one. Elon may one day make it to Mars because it would be cool to do so, but that’s not really the goal. The goal is to be what he said it would be, a global monolith.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
44035 posts
Posted on 10/9/26 at 10:44 am to
quote:

-a near monopoly on low earth orbit telecommunications and data transfer, making ground based systems and nodes obsolete


Not quite. What you will see (until they obviously buy the corp or tech) is the merging of spheres (Space v Earthern).

Nokia owns tons of patents, has very public deal with Nvidia, and has transitioned to more Data Center company.

Considering Starmind as well, I would not rule out a much bigger partnership in the future.


Regardless, Starlink and Starmind will pay for all of Elon's companies easily SOON.
Jump to page
Page First 21 22 23 24 25 ... 27
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 23 of 27Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram