Started By
Message

re: Who is WR1 or

Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:39 am to
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2340 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:39 am to
quote:

Right now, Watkins (110) and Wright (70) are the top two guys. Neither strikes me as the classic LSU "Oh, shite, cover that guy!" type dudes.


Wright has that potential. Destrehan kid, burner speed and nasty acceleration. The curl he turned into a td was next level gear.
Posted by Pas Bon
Galveston County, TX
Member since Sep 2003
2041 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:47 am to
quote:

Who is WR1


It literally does not matter in this offense.
Posted by TaderSalad
mudbug territory
Member since Jul 2014
26718 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 6:02 am to
quote:

Who is WR1


No idea, but I did notice that if a WR dropped a ball, he came out immediately and someone else went in for a play or two.

Very refreshing to see immediate accountability. The spots will be earned and I'm not sure the last time we saw that
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
29065 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 6:17 am to
quote:

Jackson Harris isn’t getting separation.



I'll give him more than one game to find chenistry with Leavitt. H9w much mas Hampton on him Sat? That's a damn good corner awd it makes sense to look elsewhere if you have other options.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
43026 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:34 am to
Green is WR1 which means we have 3 guys who were the #1 options on teams last year serving as our #2.

We are golden there.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
291914 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:43 am to
I don't think much has changed after week 1, besides Ellzy stock down a bit, Wright stock up.

people already saying WR's cant separate is lol.
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
838 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:49 am to
I don't know that you'll get a clear one this year. Lane will use a lot of them in different circumstances. I know that we are used to having a stud or two at WR....but this year, it just may be all of them in this kind of offense.
Posted by HEtiger
Member since May 2008
2064 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:09 am to
Right now, I say it is Weavy Winnie
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
72665 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:17 am to
Looking at game 1 Wilson/Watkins were the go to guys. Wilson has a lot of experience in this conference and is a very solid receiver when healthy. Watkins is going to be a highly utilized guy lane likes a lot. I dont know that either is 1st round type material, but will be super productive this year in his scheme nonetheless.

Wright is the guy I'm excited to see move forward, dude clearly was putting it all out there even with the game well secured. He wants to play, give that dude more snaps.

All the bigger receivers we have will probably just not quite be talented enough to consistently get separation in this conference loaded with good DBs. Clemson's best strength was probably their secondary so take note of that. They have a projected 1st round CB (Hampton) for 2027 draft. But taking a look at our "Bigger" receivers:

Roman Mothershed - 6'5, 212
- Moved him to TE a bit to try and see if he would work some there, never appeared in game 1 outside of special teams

Malik Elzy - 6'2 217
- This guy somehow got the start, but didnt play much in the game after his drop/INT. He had like 16 catches in 3 years at Illinois, I doubt he's any kind of answer

Josh Jackson - 6'2 199
- Didn't play in the game, in year 2 at McNeese had some stats, nothing notables

Tre Brown - 6'2 191
- Got a few snaps at end of game I believe with the 3s; big YPR stats from Old Dominion last year, doesnt seem like much a factor in practices leading up to season

Jackson Harris - 6'2 205
- 4th most snaps of any WR from the game, was targeted 3 times for 1 catch (big one though) but also had a drop; could have most potential in this group...big stats at Hawai'i last season (big YPR guy)

Brayden Allen - 6'2 198
- Among the true freshmen looks to be either #2 or #3 (Depending where Jabari Mack sits) of them behind Corey Barber and did not play in game 1


Both Jackson Harris and Jayce Brown were targeted 3 times, both had 1 catch and 1 drop in the game. I think people generally expect more from Jayce Brown in the long run considering he was pretty good at KSU. Neither graded out well against Clemson though (sub 60 per PFF).
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:21 am
Posted by Kool Kaliper
Mansfield, TX
Member since Nov 2018
4015 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:35 am to
From what I've observed, the team doesn't have a standout #1 wide receiver (WR). Clemson's defensive backs (DBs) mostly managed to shut down the outside WRs. I re-watched the game yesterday and didn't really notice the KSU or Hawaii WR making an impact. If they can't get past Clemson's DBs, they'll likely struggle against stronger and faster DBs from the SEC.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
36363 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Watkins was easily the most reliable guy.


Outside of Watkins, the WRs were, at best, inconsistent Saturday night (I'm not counting Green as a WR). For as poor as they played overall, Clemson still has some good players in the secondary and LSU's WRs weren't able to get much separation on deep throws.

IMO, there was so much good on Saturday night. But I think the WRs have the biggest room for improvement
Posted by Clark W Griswold
THE USA
Member since Sep 2012
10988 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:42 am to
I think it’ll be a workshare all year where each will have games where they lead in stats. It might be a game planning thing depending on coverage and who they trust. But we don’t have anyone who is a true WR1.
Posted by Sailin Tiger
Member since Jul 2014
1714 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:28 am to
I'm hoping to see Mothershed this weekend after hearing about him off and on through the offseason though have no idea if he has the potential to be a regular contributor.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
73809 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:35 am to
We are being a bit nit picky since we had a guy go for over 100, we had another who went for 70 and a TD and we had one more who had 4 catches and dropped a big gain where he was 5 yards by his man. The drops weren’t good and a couple of guys didn’t do anything so that was a negative but IMO those players are at best your 3rd guy and at worst 5th and 6th guys. And like you mentioned we have Green who’s going to draw defenders and the run game looked good which will give those guys who did show something a lot of 1 on 1s.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram