Started By
Message

re: What does the mean? NCAA: LSU infractions case will be resolved through the IARP

Posted on 9/23/20 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
8880 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 12:30 pm to
Means the NCAA could not accumulate enough evidence that it is allowed to use against LSU under NCAA bylaws to support a Notice of Allegations, so it is punting to the independent panel in an attempt to save face from a PR standpoint.

This is a good sign for the good guys.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
50348 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 12:31 pm to
OLOL issue may result in vacating some wins if it was determined payments were made while Vadal was playing.

Some of the payments were after Vadal was finished with his LSU career and the ones to Davey was way after his career was over.

The Beckham payments won't amount to anything as that money was returned by players and I think only one or two were players that still had eligibility.

The basketball issue is only due to a phone call wiretap with no other proof of anything.
Posted by TBoy@LSU
Member since Sep 2012
5772 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

In a 10-page letter to the IRC, LSU did not object to the basketball case being referred to the IARP, so long as three separate NCAA investigations into its football program are not lumped into the same case.


LINK

Well, looks like they got lumped.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67851 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 12:56 pm to
The NCAA isn't stupid. They know that the way to get to Will Wade is to take LSU football with him.
Posted by Sissidog02
Member since Jan 2020
6128 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:00 pm to
I had one of those , I broke my ankle in the bathtub = infraction
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
50348 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:01 pm to
The target is Wade and just like the corrupt NCAA did with Lester Earl to get Dale Brown they are targeting LSU football to get to Wade who is the big fish they want fried in this.
Posted by LCTFAN
New Iberia
Member since Mar 2013
2823 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Geaux_Tigers_08


quote:

The NCAA has dragged this out over multiple years and it seems like they might bring the hammer down on both programs.


Dellenger is a sports writer and reports what is told to him by sources. Basketball does seem to be more serious and potential getting the hammer however to group football into a hammer being brought down on the program does seem dramatic.

I know you are repeating what Dellenger is writing but he is a reporter that is reporting news, news does not have to be accurate and only what someone has said.

Posted by Fightin Okra
Member since Nov 2016
5931 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:13 pm to
Didn’t ol’ boy from OLOL give money to some players parents? Not saying he did it but put a bad look on football team
Posted by Bert Macklin FBI
Quantico
Member since May 2013
10955 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Dellenger is a sports writer and reports what is told to him by sources.


Delly is a good writer and was great when he covered LSU but since going national, he has come to see Pat Forde as a mentor and the two of them have shown zero interest in writing about both sides of the "should college football be played" dilemma. They don't think football should be played and they are gonna spin every story to say it.

They have resorted to name calling such as the "stubborn 6", they have written multiple articles about why the SEC shouldn't play without speaking to a single SEC doctor who is advising the decisions, and they both constantly tweet snarky things cuz they don't like the backlash for being contrarian dicks.
Posted by Jack Crevalle
USVI
Member since Aug 2018
7557 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Delly has come to see Pat Forde as a mentor

He is not alone.

Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
4913 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:33 pm to
File under “not good”. See Kansas situation for precedent.

Basically, thanks to LSU’s decision to retain Wade after he had been notoriously non-compliant (despite being implicated on-tape and by association with the crooked agent that was on that same tape)... the NCAA has moved away from charging basketball + thrown all these charges against the athletic department for a more serious “general lack of compliance” case instead.

They’re aggravated with Wade’s dance — it all comes back around to him. Best case scenario, LSU finds something to throw him under the bus before that committee does... and then football is business-as-usual with respect to those previously informally settled-up issues.

Worst case scenario, they level tier I violations against the athletic department for loss of control over compliance & we get postseason bans + scholly sanctions.

It will probably play out somewhere in between, but I don’t like this development. I’d gladly sellout Wade/basketball to protect what Orgeron is building — for a multitude of reasons spanning from financial to story/integrity to what the respective programs have meant to the state culturally.

I know a lot of you will hate this take, but I’m just looking at the basketball situation objectively + what has now been placed on the table.

Not worth the risk just to protect a guy who wouldn’t even throw our own athletic dept admins a bone (see: why Wade was sidelined by the university for postseason last year).
This post was edited on 9/23/20 at 2:09 pm
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8438 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:35 pm to
We’ll know more once they rule on Kansas and Memphis, both of whom are ahead of LSU in the committee’s pecking order.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
4913 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

We’ll know more once they rule on Kansas and Memphis, both of whom are ahead of LSU in the committee’s pecking order

Fingers crossed

The real screwed up irony in all of this is that there is much more evidence and weight behind the football-related charges BECAUSE of Orgeron & co’s compliance and cooperation.

The basketball charges are way more devious and actually implicate active program staff, but any evidence of it is being hidden/protected. NCAA would have never gone after football if they didn’t want to get Wade so bad, so this is the route they’re taking — I mean, Orgeron’s administration doesn’t have sh*t to do with rogue boosters embezzling children’s hospitals or former players with evolving attention issues. This is really upsetting IMO.
This post was edited on 9/23/20 at 2:15 pm
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
6142 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 2:15 pm to
The NCAA laid off the bulk of their staff. I think this is a simple as the internal resources are not available to complete the investigation and hearing process, so they punted to the third party. If they review the same information as the NCAA had, I don’t see anything happening to LSU. Now, if there is a smoking gun or proof that we have not seen you can book it that the hammer will drop. There has been so much media hype about the Wade case, NCAA only saves face by bumping it to the third party. If they had it, they would have charged Wade 6 or more months ago. You can book it. I agree that football is just a tactic to gain leverage , but it all comes to down a smoking gun against Wade. If there is none, minor penalty to football, if any, for the old OLOL criminal acts.
Posted by WuShock
Metairie
Member since Aug 2018
1366 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Keep in mind Kansas has had an open case going with the IARP since summer of 2019


Kansas wasn't referred to the IARP until this summer (2020). KU most likely won't hear a response until the spring of 2021, and no one knows what the process is. LINK

This has generally been seen as a positive as the IARP isn't going to do any additional digging into the schools. It becomes more of a legal-based trial between the NCAA and the schools. It takes away the NCAA's role as the judge, jury, and executioner, and the hope from the universities' perspective is that the NCAA will have a higher burden of proof.

The majority of panel members have some sort of sports background, but are founded on the legal side of things. Here is the list of panel members. Only five will be chosen to review each case.

Like many people have said, no one knows the full response from the IARP, but it sounds like it's a more positive step for the schools. LSU's case probably won't be decided until late next spring or summer.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
32033 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

File under “not good”. See Kansas situation for precedent.


There is no precedent. The IARP has literally never made a decision. It's a brand new process. More than anything else, this process allows the NCAA to get out of the investigating/infractions business to some extent. It also helps shield then from allegations of inequitable treatment among schools

The press release from the NCAA is one paragraph. It doesn't say one way or the other if this is strictly involving basketball or if football is also involved. It's all "confidential".

NO ONE can say whether this development is good or bad for LSU/Wade because THERE IS NO PRECEDENT for it.

This is an article from a law professor and expert on sports law outlining the Memphis case. It should give a bit of insight as to the potential handling of the LSU case

LINK

That aside, let's contrast the three schools and the allegations against them.

Memphis: There is no dispute Penny paid Wiseman "moving expense" to come from Nashville to Memphis when Penny was a High School HC. The question is whether those payments were considered payments of a "Memphis booster" (Penny) that were meant to induce Wiseman to later sign with Memphis.

Kansas: There is no dispute that runners/agents/employee of Adidas arranged for money to paid to Kansas recruits. That evidence was introduced in the Dawkins trial. It happened. There is no dispute money was, in fact, paid.

LSU: All we, the public, know of is the wiretap where Wade is saying he made an offer to Smart. However, there still seems to be nothing to show Smart actually received anything. Of course it is naïve to think he didn't. But unlike Memphis and Kansas where we KNOW money was exchange, that doesn't seem to be the case for LSU.

The media has covered the story breathlessly since it broke in March of 2019. Yet, there has been virtually NOTHING new that has come to light since. Despite all of the digging by the media. It's still a lot of hearsay and innuendo. If/when your case is SOLEY based on testimonial evidence then the credibility of the witnesses becomes a major issue.

The last report we have is:

quote:

the NCAA's enforcement staff said it received information that Wade arranged for, offered or provided impermissible payments, including cash payments, to at least 11 potential recruits or other associated people.


That's the NCAA's allegation. What information? From whom? Is that information credible? Is there corroborating evidence to back up testimony? There are a ton of questions to be resolved and WE, the public, simply don't have enough information to evaluate the allegations. It is entirely possible the NCAA kicked this to the IARP in hopes the committee will be able to find something the NCAA hasn't yet. But remember, there is STILL no subpoena power under the IARP. If people don't want to talk then they don't have to.

If you want something to feel "good" about as an LSU fan, I think there are two things to look at:

1. The media is ALWAYS looking for stories they can sensationalize. Nearly 20 months after the story initially broke the media has found nothing other than the original wiretap. Is there anything else of substance out there?

2. At any point subsequent to the 18-19 season Smart could have gone pro (even if that wasn't in the NBA) and rid himself of this entire pain in the arse. Once he is no longer an amateur the NCAA has no jurisdiction over him whatsoever. Yet, not only did he play all of last season, he's back for this season. Seems like an unnecessary decision for a guy who is "inevitably" going to be ruled ineligible and forbidden from playing.
Posted by jbraua
Oklahoma City, OK
Member since Oct 2007
7125 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

The football program is being used to try and "prove" lack of institutional control and likey to try to push the athletic department to help with Wade in order to protect the cash cow, football.


If this interpretation is true, Wade will be sacrificed on a purple and gold platter with an apple in his mouth.
Posted by NFLU
New Orleans, LA
Member since Aug 2014
5840 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 2:59 pm to
Nothing is going to happen. How many years have we heard this?
Posted by honeybadger07
The Woodlands
Member since Jul 2015
3263 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Fake news. What has LSU football done you imbecile?


- Vadal Alexander
- OLL
- $180k payment

I don’t know what LSU football has in relation to this shite other than this is the smoke that has been discussed for over a year now.

Get with it Oscar

Posted by XbengalTiger
New Bama Standard 9-4
Member since Oct 2003
5505 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

The NCAA isn't stupid.
That remains to be seen. They have forced LSU to go all in to protect the house now.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram