- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
DeathByTossDive225
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Baton Rouge |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7593 |
| Registered on: | 9/3/2019 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: GEOTUS raises tariffs from 10% to 15%
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 11:48 am to BarnHater
Sanctions fall under executive power, but sanctions require a target and rationale.
Broadside tariffs are closer to an import tax & usually fall under purview of Congress.
The difference between the tariffs just announced vs the previous wave is that tariffs implemented under 122 have a maximum life of 150 days.
SCOTUS decision reinstates some stability around US trade policy.
Some of you talk about tariffs like you have them confused with a salary bonus lmfao.
Broadside tariffs are closer to an import tax & usually fall under purview of Congress.
The difference between the tariffs just announced vs the previous wave is that tariffs implemented under 122 have a maximum life of 150 days.
SCOTUS decision reinstates some stability around US trade policy.
Some of you talk about tariffs like you have them confused with a salary bonus lmfao.
re: Coach Yo Stuffing Kiffin in A Locker WOOF
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 11:23 am to REBEL5 AC
Starting to think you may be an LSU alter. If so, I tip my cap :geauxtigers:
re: Where are the "No Kings" weirdos after the SCOTUS ruling?
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 10:46 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Legislate? Nahh. Just arbitrarily change the word "tax" to "penalty". Boom. Done.
This is probably why targeted sanctions coming down from the executive were always considered kosher.
It’s more difficult to call it a sanction when it’s just 10% across the board.
One scenario requires a target and rationale. The other is closer to just being an import tax.
re: Where are the "No Kings" weirdos after the SCOTUS ruling?
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 10:38 am to Tigahs24Seven
I’ll bite.
Wouldn’t SCOTUS ruling in favor of trade policy being something we should legislate and commit to sort of validate any arguments against expansion of executive power or dubious invocation of emergency powers?
Wouldn’t SCOTUS ruling in favor of trade policy being something we should legislate and commit to sort of validate any arguments against expansion of executive power or dubious invocation of emergency powers?
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 10:24 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
I'm not sure how reliable someone's critical thinking abilities are if they still believe complex life was birthed from a single cell organism in a primordial soup somewhere on earth 4 billion years ago.
The Dunning-Kruger is strong in this one.
re: SCOTUS ruling disproves Democrats’ claims that the high court is in Trump’s pocket.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 10:20 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
My takeaway is that Gorsuch is now the intellectual center of the Court. He’s willing to put principle over party and policy.
In all seriousness, best response in the thread.
re: TRUMP: "You're Going to find out"
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 10:11 am to Jbird
quote:
tariffs are gone forever?
Not at all.
quote:
tariffs can no longer be tweeted. (There will be) downstream economic boon & stability (as a result of going back to) having to legislate, clearly define, and commit to trade policy.
Requiring votes on changes to trade policy means no wiggle room for rug pulls or market manipulation & actually gives more weight to threats of sanctions.
re: TRUMP: "You're Going to find out"
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 10:07 am to AlterEd
quote:
Did you expect him to have the evidence requested on hand right then?
Usually when someone makes a bombastic claim, yes — you expect them to be able to substantiate it.
If he doesn’t have evidence what is the statement exactly?
Sorry to everyone who is upset that tariffs can no longer be tweeted + the downstream economic boon & stability that will result from having to legislate, clearly define, and commit to trade policy.
lol.
re: SCOTUS ruling disproves Democrats’ claims that the high court is in Trump’s pocket.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 10:02 am to Load Toad
quote:
Most importantly, Americans will have right own guns for next 30 years
This will never change. More 2A Dems than you might think.
re: SCOTUS ruling disproves Democrats’ claims that the high court is in Trump’s pocket.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 9:54 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
So you are saying MAYBE the court is balanced between them and the 3 kook autovotes for the democrats?
The problem is that whatever bias you believe the court has… it’s mostly a group of kangaroo fricksticks politically posturing & twisting logic to fit desired outcomes, rather than even attempting to maintain an illusion of interpreting the written laws of the country with some semblance of consistency.
This one should have been unanimous. Thomas & co just wagging their tails for show.
It’s pathetic.
re: SCOTUS ruling disproves Democrats’ claims that the high court is in Trump’s pocket.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 9:41 am to Timeoday
3 judges dissented on a ruling that basically amounts to “trade policy shouldn’t be dictated by the president’s tweets.”
That’s actually incredible & doesn’t prove what you think it does.
That’s actually incredible & doesn’t prove what you think it does.
re: Can the executive branch sue the legislature for failure to do work?
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 9:35 am to HagaDaga
quote:
It's like the CEO of a company having to go to a first year paralegal to get what he wants started up the ranks of the legal dept. Instead of just being able to walk into the head of legals office and hashing things out. Things move too fast, and deserve quick definitive answers.
Not even close. Their authority is divided by specific responsibility.
Co-equal means they check and balance each other thanks to divisions of power & bureaucratic process.
It does not mean they can circumvent whatever they want & use “co-equal” as an excuse. Congrats on one of the worst attempted interpretations of separation of powers I have ever seen in my life.
re: Can the executive branch sue the legislature for failure to do work?
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/21/26 at 9:31 am to weagle1999
quote:
The Legislative branch has willingly ceded much of its authority to the Judicial because members of Congress don’t want to make hard decisions and endanger their re-election prospects.
Accurate analysis of what is happening, but it shouldn’t be — I would argue the legislative branch has an obligation to its role under the constitution.
re: Grand Marshall of Endimyon ...what is the oxford equivalent?
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/15/26 at 5:22 pm to icecreamsnowball
quote:
Grand Wizard
Beat me to it :lol:
re: Was John Brady fired too soon?
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/15/26 at 5:03 pm to Madking
quote:
He was an abrasive guy back then
That was part of the fun IMO. Wade got guard talent, but Brady had some monsters.
Swift, Bass, Thomas, Davis. Completely dominant collegiate post players. Thornton and Darrel Mitchell were his best guards, scary to think what he might’ve done with a Waters or Smart.
Mitchell played out of his mind in that tournament though. I vaguely remember him doing something dumb like 3 pt, steal, 3pt and-one within a very short amount of time to keep that final four run alive. Can’t recall the opponent.
He wasn’t on anyone’s radar living in Tyrus’ shadow most of the season, but he was arguably MVP that March. Wound up in the NBA in the end.
One of my favorite basketball tigers ever.
re: Maybe Nate oats was right, Florida camps out in the lane.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/15/26 at 3:34 pm to Rzrbackguy
quote:
tents in the lane are beyond outrageous
To be fair I’m not even sure why this is still a rule in college basketball, because they haven’t been calling it for 10+ years.
re: OUR PRESIDENT, Pardons LSU great Billy Cannon!!
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/13/26 at 4:19 pm to CajunFrench
quote:
look all the mentally ill liberal cucks downvoting. What happened to this place
Populist movements always end the same way. Eventually, fatigue sets in.
Also, tRant isn’t a random cross-section of the US… but it’s certainly more random than the poli board.
quote:
CajunFrench
You should consider going and learning something about your history & heritage.
MAGA Acadians are more ironic than gay Catholics… by several orders of magnitude.
re: LSU would like to introduce the SEC Rant to…Big Poppa.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/13/26 at 4:02 pm to NFLSU
Bayou Bambino
re: I’ve been in Baton Rouge this week for work…
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/11/26 at 11:28 pm to semjase
quote:
Stay south of I-10/I-12 and you'll be OK.
It’s really not even that bad unless you wander into a residential area north of Florida blvd.
Jefferson hwy is north of the split lol.
Towne Centre & even midcity are fun places to hang out.
re: I’ve been in Baton Rouge this week for work…
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/11/26 at 11:21 pm to wadewilson
quote:
You're in St George. Nice area.
I’m in St. George. Never not calling it Baton Rouge, it’s literally in EBR.
re: Final Four appearances by SEC teams
Posted by DeathByTossDive225 on 2/11/26 at 10:40 pm to Go Go Gata
Razorback basketball doesn’t get enough respect.
Popular
0












