- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morning
Posted on 12/4/22 at 1:03 pm to Sticker1971
Posted on 12/4/22 at 1:03 pm to Sticker1971
If you are a defensive player, carry a clip of that play with you to show the refs. "You guys said this dude was NOT targeting, so how the hell can you call it on what I did?"
0
Posted on 12/4/22 at 1:08 pm to Eighteen
quote:
It’s absolute bullshite how a TE as big as him gets “protection” from all kinds of touches
It was also BS calling a block below the knees on our DB against that guy. He hit him at the belt line.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 1:09 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
The SEC doesn’t protect a specific team
Afraid I'm going to have to call BS on this. LSU is Bama's biggest threat to winning the SEC West any given year. We will never get those calls.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 1:15 pm to WackyChris
quote:
Yes they do, see Bama … for years!
Except for all the times they don't.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 1:41 pm to Sticker1971
The replay clearly showed the LSU player's snap back violently when hit in the head
Posted on 12/4/22 at 1:58 pm to Sticker1971
I don't complain about things like this too much but this was 100% an SEC call.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 2:00 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Kinda felt we were treated kindly at times in 2019.
Exactly!
Posted on 12/4/22 at 2:04 pm to LongueCarabine
quote:
It was also BS calling a block below the knees on our DB against that guy. He hit him at the belt line.
That was a terrible call
Posted on 12/4/22 at 3:45 pm to tigerpimpbot
I expect games to be fixed, but when they compromise player safety, it really makes me mad. LSU players have taken many cheap shots with no call, yet we lost an All American LB a few years ago for a big game for simply pushing a player.
The SEC has reached WWE level
The SEC has reached WWE level
Posted on 12/4/22 at 3:52 pm to Sticker1971
Totally agree. It was targeting.
I'm also salty about the missed call on the first down after review. I thought he clearly crossed the line to make.
The officiating crew Saturday was not favorable for us. I still think we would have loss if the game was evenly officiated but the bad calls/missed calls didn't help.
I'm also salty about the missed call on the first down after review. I thought he clearly crossed the line to make.
The officiating crew Saturday was not favorable for us. I still think we would have loss if the game was evenly officiated but the bad calls/missed calls didn't help.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 4:09 pm to Riverside
They set the tone early in the game when they didn’t call the blatant PF on UGA’s first punt. I knew after that LSU had no shot. I prefer a blowout than to lose by being cheated. UGA was the better team by far. They didn’t need the blatant cheating, but I get it. Just sucks when the SEC basically says “we don’t care about players, just the agenda”.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 4:11 pm to Sticker1971
Likewise. Skanky & his good ole boys in Bham protecting their latest darling cash cow.
F him & the conference office mafia.
F him & the conference office mafia.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 4:38 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
They set the tone early in the game when they didn’t call the blatant PF on UGA’s first punt. I knew after that LSU had no shot. I prefer a blowout than to lose by being cheated. UGA was the better team by far. They didn’t need the blatant cheating, but I get it. Just sucks when the SEC basically says “we don’t care about players, just the agenda”.
Yes it should have been called, but can I just say how supremely stupid your guy was for not calling a fair catch with Green obviously coming in hot? Even if he had timed the contact properly, the receiver was taking a stupid risk-reward option. Not to mention, the replay also showed on obvious LSU hold, also not called, on McConkey.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 5:20 pm to KLSU
quote:
Classic targeting call and why the rule was put in place.
I would still like to know the reasoning that wasn’t targeting.
And our RB had to come out and we saw a pic of him shaking his head, while their DB stays in the game. WTH?! Awful call.
I'm a TCU fan for the CFPs.
Posted on 12/4/22 at 5:24 pm to Sticker1971
I’ve been saying forever that the SEC conference officiating is the WORST in every college sports in the NCAA.. it will never change…
Posted on 12/5/22 at 8:13 am to PassingThrough
quote:
Yes it should have been called, but can I just say how supremely stupid your guy was for not calling a fair catch with Green obviously coming in hot?
Agreed but that's not what happened. What happened was the defender got there early, and it was obvious during real time. Two refs standing there and they let it ride.
quote:
Not to mention, the replay also showed on obvious LSU hold, also not called, on McConkey.
It's OK. They got UGA plenty of makeup calls, including allowing them to target a player and get away with it. I think it more than evened out.
Posted on 12/5/22 at 8:16 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Nobody’s blaming the loss on the refs but that was the most obvious nod to UGA’s playoff stakes anyone could’ve imagined.
The refs did not realize that it was a UGA backup player called for the potential targeting play. They probably were thinking it would be bad for an UGA starter to miss the first half of the playoff game. If hey knew it was a backup player they would have allowed the targeting call to stand.
Posted on 12/5/22 at 8:18 am to Sticker1971
quote:
Complete BS to reverse that.
COMPLETE
Posted on 12/5/22 at 8:21 am to Sticker1971
That’s the 3rd or 4th targeting call we saw reversed this year.
I just don’t understand how they can take off targeting but not still enforce an unnecessary roughness type penalty.
I just don’t understand how they can take off targeting but not still enforce an unnecessary roughness type penalty.
Posted on 12/5/22 at 8:24 am to GumboPot
quote:
The refs did not realize that it was a UGA backup player called for the potential targeting play.
That's exactly what we thought at the game watch party I was at.
The SEC didn't want any starter from a playoff team to miss any time, so frick LSU and player safety.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News