View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morning
Posted by Sticker1971 on 12/4/22 at 11:10 am2303
Complete BS to reverse that.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by DeathByTossDive225 on 12/4/22 at 11:14 am to Sticker1971
Idk who DV’d you but 100%. Nobody’s blaming the loss on the refs but that was the most obvious nod to UGA’s playoff stakes anyone could’ve imagined. Announcers were speechless.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by geauxdroddz on 12/4/22 at 11:15 am to Sticker1971
Be nice if LSU got that protection from the league.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by Sticker1971 on 12/4/22 at 11:16 am to DeathByTossDive225
How is that NOT targeting?
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by KLSU on 12/4/22 at 11:16 am to Sticker1971
Classic targeting call and why the rule was put in place.
I would still like to know the reasoning that wasn’t targeting.
I would still like to know the reasoning that wasn’t targeting.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by nitwit on 12/4/22 at 11:19 am to geauxdroddz
The conference will indulge the SEC teams that are favorite s to win a Natty.
Usually that means Bama, now UGA.
All we go do yesterday is be spoilers for conference standings in the playoffs.
Nothing personal, just giving the edge to those teams which will create the most $ and prestige for the SEC.
Usually that means Bama, now UGA.
All we go do yesterday is be spoilers for conference standings in the playoffs.
Nothing personal, just giving the edge to those teams which will create the most $ and prestige for the SEC.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by DeathByTossDive225 on 12/4/22 at 11:21 am to geauxdroddz
quote:
Be nice if LSU got that protection from the league.
If the shoe were on the other foot, I believe we may have.
The SEC doesn’t protect a specific team year in/out, the conference protects what it perceives to be its best shot at a natty.
What they ought to be doing instead is lobbying to change the rule where a player has to sit out of a future game in which an infraction did not occur.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by zsav77 on 12/4/22 at 11:23 am to Sticker1971
SEC doing what SEC does.
Total bullshite and the person that made that call is a total piece of shite.
Total bullshite and the person that made that call is a total piece of shite.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by Toptigerfan86 on 12/4/22 at 11:24 am to Sticker1971
Yep. It’s infuriating when the frickin rules expert on the broadcast even says that’s the definition of targeting.
Official rolls up: no targeting on the play
Even Danielson said it was
But whatever. I’ve come to expect that those things will go against LSU. Seems they usually do
Official rolls up: no targeting on the play
Even Danielson said it was
But whatever. I’ve come to expect that those things will go against LSU. Seems they usually do
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by Tiger Ugly on 12/4/22 at 11:36 am to Sticker1971
I've seen much less called targeting.
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
Advertisement
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by Tubedog13 on 12/4/22 at 11:46 am to DeathByTossDive225
If it happened in the 1st half it would've been targeting. They didn't want that dude suspended for the 1st of if the playoff game.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by BigDawg0420 on 12/4/22 at 11:48 am to Sticker1971
That is exactly the type of break neck hit they are trying to eliminate from the game. Unbelievable that they reversed the call.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by White Tiger on 12/4/22 at 11:50 am to geauxdroddz
Do not want it. Just want even handed officiating.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by WackyChris on 12/4/22 at 12:25 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
The SEC doesn’t protect a specific team year in/out
Yes they do, see Bama … for years!
As far as officiating goes, I feel like the “Rules Expert” or “Rules Analyst” the TV broadcast has access to should also be the one who communicated with the White Hat on the field during reviews.
They are non-biased, 3rd parties that will help get more calls right. Rules guy last night said it was targeting (because if fricking was) and the flag was still picked up.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by Volvagia on 12/4/22 at 12:33 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
If the shoe were on the other foot, I believe we may have.
The SEC doesn’t protect a specific team year in/out, the conference protects what it perceives to be its best shot at a natty.
Kinda felt we were treated kindly at times in 2019.
And that if we hadn’t knocked ourselves out of contention be embarrassing ourselves against A&M, we would have gotten more even reffing.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by Eighteen on 12/4/22 at 12:35 pm to Sticker1971
Also Washington clear targeting on his “block” on the touchdown run (and then taunted afterward)
It’s absolute bullshite how a TE as big as him gets “protection” from all kinds of touches and hits yet he gets to use his helmet and maul DBs who can’t hit him anywhere except right in his midsection
It’s absolute bullshite how a TE as big as him gets “protection” from all kinds of touches and hits yet he gets to use his helmet and maul DBs who can’t hit him anywhere except right in his midsection
This post was edited on 12/4 at 12:36 pm
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by JonTheTigerFan on 12/4/22 at 12:43 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Idk who DV’d you
cajunbama still mad about not getting into LSU with his 14 ACT
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by taf on 12/4/22 at 12:51 pm to geauxdroddz
quote:
Be nice if LSU got that protection from the league.
I hear ya.
Sure, Georgia was better and deserved to win. But I swear it seems we never got many “benefit of the doubt” calls or “interpretive” calls this year. On obvious calls, sure we “won” some replays, but on most of those “wins” I don’t know why they even reviewed them. The only one I can remember is in the Arkansas game on a close spot. I think that was the right call on replay, but it was very close and I wouldn’t have been terribly upset if they missed it. Maybe there were others and I just don’t remember.
In this targeting call, I’m not sure why they reversed it. I had the volume muted (because I can’t stand to listen to the announcers), so I don’t know what was said. The only thing I can figure is that targeting rule requires that the player be defenseless. A receiver making a catch is defenseless. A runner going upfield is not (unless being held up by tackler). Maybe they said Josh turned upfield and was already a runner, so he wasn’t defenseless. bullshite, but it might have been their “interpretation” of the play.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by OutOfNames on 12/4/22 at 12:58 pm to taf
I watched the KState game, and the officiating was outstanding in every facet. The SEC is a fricking racket.
re: The Targeting reversal still pisses me off this morningPosted by DeathByTossDive225 on 12/4/22 at 1:01 pm to Volvagia
Agreed. I’d expect DVs, but it’s just an inconvenient fact that Bama happens to be favored most recent years.
Had we dominated A&M & been in a close game there, we’d have gotten the call. Had the targeting been in the first half, we’d have gotten the call.
Had we dominated A&M & been in a close game there, we’d have gotten the call. Had the targeting been in the first half, we’d have gotten the call.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News