- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The CFP is the worst system for determining a champion...ever.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:09 pm to tigabait01
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:09 pm to tigabait01
quote:
Just pick 4 from the 5 conference champs.
Too much to put on one game. You could have an SEC West team run the table, be 12-0 heading into the SEC championship, have played several top 10 teams so far, and get beat in an uncharacteristic game by a 10-3 SEC East team that they could have beat in regular season, and get knocked out.
I liked the BCS, could have kept that system and do a top 4 with that.
Honestly, seeing the Bowl Selection Committee show on ESPN tonight was laughable. Saying that pitting two teams from the same division in the championship game is what killed the BCS, then having people argue that Bama should be in the top 4 cuz Tua's limp.
Yea, lets put those same two teams in the top 4 again!
0
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:11 pm to TchPowDog
Still peddling your stupid shite I ripped up yesterday I see
Dumbfrick
Dumbfrick
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:11 pm to tigabait01
Or. Just allow all 5 power 5 conferences to have a team and then one at large bid that goes to the best of the non-power 5 teams.
1 and 2 have byes.
3 vs 6 and 4 vs 5 two weeks after conference champ week. Then regular playoffs in January.
1 and 2 have byes.
3 vs 6 and 4 vs 5 two weeks after conference champ week. Then regular playoffs in January.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:48 pm to tigabait01
It's better than every poll claiming a champion and there being multiple.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 10:52 pm to tigabait01
Georgia and Alabama were the two best teams a couple years ago. I would rather see it expanded to 8 teams then to only pick from conference champs.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 11:06 pm to tigabait01
This “committee” is 100% owned and run by the networks. It was set up this way because it’s much easier to control a handful of people to get the ratings they want than it is to control hundreds of writers, coaches and computer modules.
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:10 am to tigabait01
I mean they’ve done pretty well in the 5 or years they’ve been doing it. Can’t really look at any year and not think they got it right
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:20 am to tigabait01
Agree the system the NCAA has is stupid.
SEC setup is even worse with the rivalry bs.
SEC setup is even worse with the rivalry bs.
Posted on 11/13/19 at 5:23 am to TigersJump
quote:
This “committee” is 100% owned and run by the networks. It was set up this way because it’s much easier to control a handful of people to get the ratings they want than it is to control hundreds of writers, coaches and computer modules.
yep, that's why the AP poll and coaches poll was done away with and the BCS (which was kinda working at the end) was brought in.
Go back to BCS, use 6 teams where #1 and #2 get a bye and DONE. Let things flow naturally.
Stop trying to increase and manipulate market share thru the conferences.
Posted on 11/13/19 at 5:39 am to UGATiger26
5 conference champs and one at large bid.
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 5:39 am
Posted on 11/13/19 at 5:58 am to Muahahaha
Not that hard........ Road map of how to do is right in front of us.... FCS, DII, DIII, etc. D1 football is the only NCAA sport with out a true playoff. In the end money wins on this, period. That's why we have what we have.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 6:04 am
Posted on 11/13/19 at 6:06 am to tigabait01
Worse than the old Bowl and Poll System or the BCS? I don't think so.
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 6:07 am
Posted on 11/13/19 at 6:19 am to tigabait01
The computer only model had its flaws too, The coaches poll is not a poll of coaches. They don’t have time for that shite. SIDs fill out their responses. The AP is subjective as hell and relies on “brand” recognition. The computer models are flawed.
There has to be a human element.
Regardless, the CFP committee results have closely mirrored the simulated BCS models.
There has to be a human element.
Regardless, the CFP committee results have closely mirrored the simulated BCS models.
Posted on 11/13/19 at 7:26 am to Pelican fan99
quote:
I mean they’ve done pretty well in the 5 or years they’ve been doing it. Can’t really look at any year and not think they got it right
ex-fricking-actly
what tha frick is thread even complaining about? All these so called solutions would make things worse
Posted on 11/13/19 at 7:28 am to tigabait01
Take 8
5 Power 5 champs
3 at large.
Play one extra week at home field of highest seed then got to the final four and championship game at neutral sites. All problems solved.
5 Power 5 champs
3 at large.
Play one extra week at home field of highest seed then got to the final four and championship game at neutral sites. All problems solved.
Posted on 11/13/19 at 7:29 am to tigabait01
The BCS was better than this subjective eye test bullshite
Posted on 11/13/19 at 8:55 am to ibldprplgld
I call it "It's all about the ratings test."
Posted on 11/13/19 at 11:38 am to Madking
quote:
At some point teams have to earn something.
Oh. So Oregon or Utah deserve to be #5 over Bama? I would love to know how you justify this.
But I'm pretty sure all I'm going to get is "Bama is a media darling" or "Bama has favoritism", blah blah.
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 11:46 am
Posted on 11/13/19 at 11:38 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
Still peddling your stupid shite I ripped up yesterday I see
WTF are you talking about??????????
Posted on 11/13/19 at 11:40 am to Crow Pie
quote:
The BCS was better than this subjective eye test bullshite
God damn you people are idiots. 2/3 of the BCS was based on HUMAN voters. Do you know how much 2/3 is? It's 66.66%
You think all of those voters didn't use the eye test to put LSU at #2 in 2007?
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 11:43 am
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News