boxcar willie

[quote]The choice is clear, you're either for a sovereign America or you're for Globalism![/quote] we do live together as a form of life that exists on a planet that revolves around a star. Isn't it about time we acknowledge that fact? ...

Still hard to believe the oline couldn't get the push up front to get that one yard. Ingram could have been the difference there. But still, we could have lined up with Tory Carter at FB leading the way in an I formation (dudes a beast) and punched it in going behind Hines. At first I was more ...

[quote]The interior DL is just big, fat 3-4 run stuffers...not pass rushers. [/quote] the biggest fattest one is the one we miss the most though, Shelvin. Players like Logan, Farrell, Ika, Evans, and Roy can play in a 3-4 or a 4-3, doesn't matter. Though all of them are pretty good, none of those...

I was a bit upset when after we broke off a big run on 1st down to start the second half we ran the ball again on the very next play when we should have passed the ball after a big run like that. The whole idea is to keep the defense off balance. So little things like that bothered me with the offen...

[quote]Simplify the Defense.....[/quote] wrong. Need to drill down more on assignments and who does what in situations. Simplicity is opposite of the problem. ...

[quote]Shelvin and Vincent on the field could make a big difference in the defense. Both losses were close so it's not far fetched to think we win both. But the defensive coaching is lacking enough to where we can comfortably say we would still be bad. [/quote] Thats what I am saying. 100% agree...

[quote]but he needs to simplify some shite or the players need to work harder to figure it out. [/quote] I think it might be just the opposite. It may be to simple and the players don't have clear cut assignments. Wasn't the idea to simplify the defense and not have the players overthink but to ...

[quote]We are losing cuz no one knows what the frick they are doing. [/quote] Just letting the d loose and being aggressive sounds good in theory but maybe those days of defense theory are over. I had fully bought into that idea as well but now see that a cerebral assignment oriented D is 100% ne...

[quote]If we had those 2 guys, we'd just have 2 more guys that don't know what they are doing. [/quote] I disagree, those 2 are a big step up over who we have in their places. Ika is no where close to what Shelvin brings and having Vincent in place of Flott or Harris/Hampton would be a big upgra...

[quote]Thomas is still healing from his injury sustained last year, he's not even an option from a "good to play" standpoint. Coach O even mentioned he wouldnt be available for the Mizzou game with Ingram out. With Bradford just seems like a major weight issue still. [/quote] thanks...

[quote]There won't be any more useful information in this thread than there has been in any of the previous 20 threads asking the same question. [/quote] I havent looked at even one of those so called "previous" threads. [quote]Bradford's weight and Kardell's twitter[/quote] so you are s...

We are 3-0 right now if those two didn't opt out. Not saying the defense would be good with those two, but it would be much much better. We just don't have anyone close to what Shelvin would have brought to the dline, though J Roy will be there in time. Plus Vincent, with all his faults, is still li...

Glad to see that Charles Turner is thought highly enough to fill in for Ingram as I wondered why he was offered and thought he would always be to small and not SEC caliber for an O lineman. So really glad that, as usual, I was wrong and the staff, as always, were right about who to offer and can see...

[quote]If someone wants an abortion, that's between them and God. I just don't think that it should in any way be paid for by tax money that I contribute. [/quote] but in most cases it saves tax payer money in the long run. Of course in the case of rape or if the baby is defective, then the mo...

Seems like it would be the other way around...

like someone else on this board said in the other thread, she sound like she got a "D'Hiner" voice...

They hate it that they got it that way like snow flakes and cucks and shite the bed...

At least fox has the sense to hire hot arse announcers that make you want to get up on them. Even the ones like Candice Owens. Other than the few outliers like judge jenanine. While MSBC got the dog face Rachael Maddox and old arse Nancie Pelosis with her big saggy tits. NO wonder Fox kick they arse in...

Maybe at LB but kind of late to make that change now...

what the frick is the "china virus"?...