
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:05 am to WeeWee
No TRO will be granted for that.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:16 am to Easye921
quote:
You guys would be losing your shite if Alabama or Georgia were bringing a kid back from the NFL.
No lol.
I mean, if DeBoer was proactive and wasn’t terrified of his own shadow, y’all could’ve done this and gotten some needed depth pieces. I promise none of us would’ve batted an eye. But instead ya’ll choose to act morally superior and just bitch incessantly.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:52 am to jawnybnsc
quote:
So Conferences can engage in tortious interference that the court has expressly enjoined because of antitrust laws? Yeah . . . I don't think so.
What the hell are you talking about?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:01 am to Barrylsu
At least you didn’t say “fifth.”
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:30 am to Jd75189
Does this mean that Joe Burrow, Chase, and Jefferson might one day come back to LSU, once their NFL career is over?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:32 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:
He's out. They can enforce it.
IMO... if he takes it to court, he wins based upon the previous court rulling..
Disclaimer: I am no lawyer...
The NCAA and the conferences letting the courts get involved will prove to be catastrophic for the credibility of all...
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:35 am to Handsome Pete
When will the SEC ban players who were granted a 6th year of eligibility?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:51 am to JoeENorthlando
quote:Hopefully.
He's out. They can enforce it.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:56 am to Jake88
quote:
When will the SEC ban players who were granted a 6th year of eligibility?
Beat me to it
Posted on 8/26/26 at 10:50 am to Handsome Pete
Look at this from players viewpoint and it’s hard to make a case that they should not be allowed to play another year of college ball
Posted on 8/26/26 at 11:33 am to Handsome Pete
Time for 32-64 of the top athletic schools to break ties with the NCAA and conferences to form their own league. It’s about the only thing that makes sense anymore.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:05 pm to Handsome Pete
So when the playoffs start, non SEC teams can allow these players to, but not SEC teams…. Brilliant!!!
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:10 pm to Handsome Pete
Notice the language. For football, they deny everything, even “other professional football leagues.”
For basketball, it’s limited to NBA, g-league, or WNBA or affiliate. It doesn’t include foreign professional leagues.
Why haven’t they included other sports?
College soccer players, even those on scholarship, can play semipro in the offseason and some have even played professionally overseas. They are mainly washouts, but they got paid
I wonder why that is?
For basketball, it’s limited to NBA, g-league, or WNBA or affiliate. It doesn’t include foreign professional leagues.
Why haven’t they included other sports?
College soccer players, even those on scholarship, can play semipro in the offseason and some have even played professionally overseas. They are mainly washouts, but they got paid
I wonder why that is?
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:33 pm to klrstix
He will not win. And the reason was clarified by the federal judge last month...
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
The La. court cannot force a school to accept someone ineligible for multiple other reasons besides the exception created by the 5 for 5..
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
The La. court cannot force a school to accept someone ineligible for multiple other reasons besides the exception created by the 5 for 5..
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:40 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Assuming the players attorneys will be adding the major conferences that have publicly sanctioned these players to the suit. The ordered relief does not exist if the conferences act like a cartel.
Their power is against the institutions not the players.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:53 pm to Smokin Joe Dumas
quote:
Notice the language. For football, they deny everything, even “other professional football leagues.”
For basketball, it’s limited to NBA, g-league, or WNBA or affiliate. It doesn’t include foreign professional leagues.
Why haven’t they included other sports?
College soccer players, even those on scholarship, can play semipro in the offseason and some have even played professionally overseas. They are mainly washouts, but they got paid
This is exactly why none of it will hold up in court and the rules keep getting challenged.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:34 pm to Lsudx256
quote:
Alabama must not have signed anyone doing this. Only way this would have passed.
Per DeBoer, he wanted to get one guy back, but Byrne stopped him.
Presumably so they could take this position.
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:51 pm to JoeENorthlando
quote:
He will not win. And the reason was clarified by the federal judge last month...
On August 2, 2026, U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney in Denver clarified that the injunction did not override existing NCAA roster limits, transfer rules, or revenue-sharing caps, meaning players could only return if schools had available roster spots, eligibility and scholarship/revenue space.
Im reading your posts.
You either simply dont understand, or youre purposely trolling. Theres no way you both truly understand what you're posting AND believe it.

Popular
Back to top


2








