Started By
Message

re: SEC Ban on NFL or NBA players returning is official

Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:51 pm to
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
83585 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:51 pm to
Lsu abstained from voting in the official vote
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
70872 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Lsu abstained from voting in the official vote

Clears the way for a court fight, one would think. Odd to switch for the official vote after voting yes yesterday.
Posted by 610man
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
8386 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:04 pm to
As an LSU fan, I say, LSU should move the frick on
Posted by JoeENorthlando
Member since Apr 2026
113 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:33 pm to
I don't understand? Well, apparently, you do not understand. The La. judge issued a TRO that is defacto unenforceable. I guess when all these players are suited up and playing this season, I will come back and talk about how I was wrong. Until then...I can just laugh off the trolling commentary.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
76409 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

So why don’t this imply to ineligible players also that were ruled eligible by a state judge
( Chambliss) . They can ban these players that were ruled eligible by a state judge . So why can they ban others that were ruled ineligible….. either you’re eligible or not according to the ncaa. 


The NCAA ruled both these kids and Chambliss ineligible, that was circumvented with TRO's.

The difference is the SEC decided to punish any school that plays this specific group, but not anyone who plays Chambliss.

The kids can't sue the SEC because there's nothing being levied against them specifically by the SEC, it's against the schools, if they play them.

The schools have no recourse because they voluntarily agree to let the SEC handle all of this however the SEC sees fit.

The SEC is the problem here, they're picking and choosing which of their eligibility rules they want to enforce.

By SEC rule, a player has to be in good standing with the NCAA to be eligible, Chambliss isn't (through a TRO) but the SEC isn't punishing Ole Miss for playing him.

The same with Pavia, it isn't just a Chambliss thing.

This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 2:45 pm
Posted by texastigerr
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
9466 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 3:32 pm to
So this is all moving forward. Does not effect the LSU for the exNFL guys this week that committed. Technically were they ever on the roster? And is there any teeth to the accusation that LSU told NFL players to sue?
Posted by QB
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2013
9061 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 3:40 pm to
all the while the SEC is granting an SEC team QB a 6th year. Make it make sense!
Posted by NotaStarGazer
Member since Dec 2023
3372 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

I am not sure but… if these players won a court date and all the conferences collude against them, sounds like a class action suit and damages could be awarded for lost income. SEC rules are not laws and cannot circumvent laws I agree that pro athletes should not play. However the ncaa granted foreign euro players eligibility previously and opened that can of worms.


Agree 100%. Someone acted like the SEC and other conferences don't have the same anti-trust issues that the NCAA has...uuuuhhh, yeah they do actually. Since Sankey likes monetary judgments so much, the conferences could be sanctioned MONETARY IF the courts decide in the players favor and they try to impose penalties on those players and/or schools. And I have mentioned the Euro basketball players also. If I'm the judge, they would have to give me a GREAT explanation about why paid professional basketball players from European leagues have been allowed to come and play for colleges in the US. As you said, they opened up that can of worms themselves and never said a word about it
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
16178 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:58 pm to
I will be surprised if an attorney on behalf of a player does not sue based on the fact that a kid walked away from an NFL practice squad contract because the ruling by the judge said the kid could play college ball again.

Player could get more in NIL than NFL practice squad pay-- Now kid has no employment.

Some attorney is going to sue somebody thinking some one has not covered all their tracks

Again SEC created all this crap and they are not smart enough to fix it much less make a common sense decision.
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lubbock TX
Member since Sep 2017
33660 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 5:00 pm to
yes were not getting those players or rj Luis now
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram