- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:28 pm to tiger81
quote:
Said this at the beginning of the week.... let's play ball.
one of the vaginas mentioned earlier in this thread.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:29 pm to Honkus
quote:
This is not our fight. It's the players and their lawyers.
If the injunction goes through we just should let them walk? Play for Ole Miss, Florida, Texas, etc?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:34 pm to Adam Banks
quote:quote:
Those are a lot of ifs. And those players are not game changers for LSU.
RJ Luis is.
Luis should not be eligible. He made a bad choice last year before he was out of eligibility.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:36 pm to mdomingue
At this point, it seems like the SEC/media is trying to label LSU as the bad guys, so let the players' attorneys fight until the end and see if we come out on top through their battles with the SEC, the NCAA and the courts.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:39 pm to mdomingue
quote:
He made a bad choice last year before he was out of eligibility.
I get that but also can't reconcile that with the 90+ ex-euro-pros who are eligible to play college basketball this season
There has to be some consistency in the rules and it feels like they are taking everything on a case-by-case instance.
Glad we're pushing the envelope and hope this will effect change. Until then keep pushing coach.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:41 pm to mdomingue
The amount of low testosterone males in society today is alarming.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:41 pm to mdomingue
quote:
Luis should not be eligible. He made a bad choice last year before he was out of eligibility.
They didn’t give us any extra Ws because McMahon was doing it the “right way”
They aren’t subtracting Ws from other teams playing Euro pros.
Other SEC schools are signing guys just like Luis.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:52 pm to Honkus
quote:
And Pyburn's
Pyburn was not in my original calculus on this. He may not be an every-game changer, but he is certainly a some-game changer. I would love to have him back, but not at a very steep price tag.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:56 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Other SEC schools are signing guys just like Luis.
Give me examples. You may be right.
quote:
They didn’t give us any extra Ws because McMahon was doing it the “right way”
There is no right-way BS here. Luis is pretty much the same as Bediako. If he is granted eligibility, sure, go for it. Provided LSU is insulated from any consequences.
quote:
They aren’t subtracting Ws from other teams playing Euro pros.
I have no issues with the Euros we are getting. Basketball has an odd way of determining eligibility there, but they do have a stated policy that they use for that.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:59 pm to NussBusDriver
quote:
Or just let it play out. The lawyers are handling all this stuff. It takes nothing from LSU attention wise to deal with this.
No dude, you just don’t understand, people are saying mean things about LSU on the Internet
Posted on 8/28/26 at 12:59 pm to SoloTiger
quote:
The amount of low testosterone males in society today is alarming.
Are you going around testing men's testosterone levels?
Or did you think that was witty
Gotta admit, I use some variety of that insult sometimes
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:01 pm to mdomingue
Guys like him are bringing down the collective testosterone rates of our entire fanbase.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:04 pm to mdomingue
quote:
The verbiage of the injunction will dictate that for LSU and whether it is a preliminary injunction or a permanent one. If it's a preliminary injunction that bars the NCAA or the SEC from penalizing LSU even if the final ruling is not in the players' favor, then go for it.
Those are a lot of ifs. And those players are not game changers for LSU.
So I am all for wait-and-see, but be cautious.
Youre mostly correct but overstaying the seriousness.
These judges already know to do that. They did it in the Pavia case. The SEC doesnt even have a restitution rule but the NCAA does. In either case, it will be a temp injunction with anti restitution clause.
The real question is other bs. Refs, media, recruiting etc
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:06 pm to mdomingue
Rabalais should have been relegated to women's basketball and gymnastics years ago
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:06 pm to mdomingue
quote:
Rabalais is
A pumpkin headed jackass. F that guy and the Advocate.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:07 pm to Honkus
quote:
but also can't reconcile that with the 90+ ex-euro-pros who are eligible to play college basketball this season
There is a method to determine that because of how basketball works in Europe; they start playing for professional club teams while still in HS over there.
For US college players, entering the draft and not withdrawing within 72 hours ends your eligibility. Any of the HS class of 2022 who did that this year have a case, IMO, but if they entered early last year, they do not.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 1:15 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
You seemed to straddle the fence which is fine.
I kinda do. I think the HS class of 2022 was screwed and should be able to come back. But I also see the possibility of things indirectly impacting LSU negatively, from refs to the CFP committee. I don't think the best solution is as simple as some seem to think it is.
quote:
Principle is 100% on the players' side whose 2022 class got treated differently than other classes (2020 and 2021 got the COVID year), and now classes from here on out get to potentially play 5 seasons.
Agree.
quote:
The PROPER solution is one that Rabalais didn't cover unless I missed it. The NCAA and conferences should ADMIT their timing mistake on the 5 for 5 policy change and grandfather in these players on a one time exemption. But Sankey and the other "leaders" ego probably won't allow them to admit the OBVIOUS mistake!
Also correct.
quote:
NotaStarGazer
What the heck is going on here? You and I are starting to mostly agree on stuff.
Popular
Back to top


1







