3
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Police investigating LSU football player
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:17 pm to saint tiger225
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:17 pm to saint tiger225
LSU Team Clean Sweep is on it.
They said DS is innocent.
He's a big bad LSU football player that just wanted some posse.
He most definitely DIDN'T DO NUFFIN, you know.
They said DS is innocent.
He's a big bad LSU football player that just wanted some posse.
He most definitely DIDN'T DO NUFFIN, you know.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:18 pm to semjase
You continue to be one of the biggest fricking idiots on this website
Holy shite what a fricking dumbass
Holy shite what a fricking dumbass
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:22 pm to LSBoosie
While I agree, it doesn't seem like he was holding her down forcing himself inside of her. Unless I'm reading the limited information wrong, it seems like they were fricking around, consensually, and then things changed after him being inside her for ~20 secs...
Is she some crazy chick that was trying to get a payday and when she didn't get the money she wanted, then she accused him of rape and went to police? The article says she accepted $1000 from him. Maybe she wanted more.
Or, is she a victim of someone that committed a serious crime and should be locked up?
I'm not trying to sound like a POS, but based on the info available right now, I'd have to go with the former, not the latter.
quote:
According to Title IX documents and police reports obtained by ESPN, the two students agreed that their initial sexual contact on Oct. 18, 2025, in Shanklin's residence hall room was consensual. Francis said Shanklin proceeded to have penetrative sex with her without her consent for about 20 seconds even after she told him to stop.
Shanklin said he did intentionally penetrate the woman and when he asked her if she wanted him to stop, she said nothing, according to the documents. He said in the report that he continued for about 20 seconds before she told him to stop, at which point he did.
Is she some crazy chick that was trying to get a payday and when she didn't get the money she wanted, then she accused him of rape and went to police? The article says she accepted $1000 from him. Maybe she wanted more.
Or, is she a victim of someone that committed a serious crime and should be locked up?
I'm not trying to sound like a POS, but based on the info available right now, I'd have to go with the former, not the latter.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:25 pm to semjase
Shanklin is our 4th team DE. You really think LSU would sweep this in your conspiracy mind??? Lmao
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:28 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
I’m absolutely fricking SHOCKED I tell you
The moment dollar signs are thrown out by a woman, it’s no longer rape.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:31 pm to semjase
quote:You can say a girl may be trying to setup an LSU football player without sounding like a racist douche.
semjase
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:38 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
Something is fricky here
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:40 pm to saint tiger225
quote:
Unless I'm reading the limited information wrong, it seems like they were fricking around, consensually, and then things changed after him being inside her for ~20 secs...
What makes it look even worse on her behalf, is that her actions in the following hours & days of the incident seem sketchy. She says she asked him to stop prior to penetration yet Shanklin says she didn't initially respond & waited 20 seconds afterwards to say stop which he did at that point.
Also, most sexual assault victims don't want to see or talk to their assailant yet here she was answering texts & phone calls which included asking for money in those texts.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:58 pm to BigBrod81
quote:
Shanklin said he did intentionally penetrate the woman ... continued for about 20 seconds before she told him to stop, at which point he did.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 6:03 pm to BigBrod81
I’d dismiss the case and make her pay the $1k back.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 6:07 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
I am absolutely against rapists…..however, I want a law on the books to have any rape allegation that brings charges, and then found to be false or egregious, to be prosecuted to the same extent
Posted on 10/1/26 at 6:18 pm to Juan Betanzos
$1000 for 20 seconds?
That's... what? $50 per second.
That's steep
That's... what? $50 per second.
That's steep
Posted on 10/1/26 at 6:19 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
The second she asked for and accepted money is when she lost me.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 6:25 pm to SOCAL TIGER
I know it's a tired stale cliche... but, ... believe. all. women.
Actions-- have consequences.
Actions-- have consequences.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 6:25 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
Just the tip is a hard game
Posted on 10/1/26 at 6:52 pm to tarzana
Get bent
Posted on 10/1/26 at 7:05 pm to BigBrod81
quote:
the two students agreed that their initial sexual contact on Oct. 18, 2025, in Shanklin's residence hall room was consensual. Francis said Shanklin proceeded to have penetrative sex with her without her consent for about 20 seconds even after she told him to stop.
Wtf does this even mean?
Posted on 10/1/26 at 7:08 pm to EarnYourStripes
quote:
$1000 for 20 seconds? That's... what? $50 per second.
Posted on 10/1/26 at 7:10 pm to Juan Betanzos
quote:
I am absolutely against rapists…..however, I want a law on the books to have any rape allegation that brings charges, and then found to be false or egregious, to be prosecuted to the same extent
The problem is that in cases like this it’s just one person’s word against another’s.
They’d had consensual sex previously, they were engaging in consensual intimacy, he claims to have asked her if she wanted him to stop, they both claim it was brief / 20s, they both claim she haggled for money & a payment was made.
Many people will never inspect the details & this dude will never live down the accusation in the eyes of many even if acquitted.
Rape is despicable & I get why women are usually given the benefit of the doubt, but this smells funny. Situational skepticism should not be taboo when someone’s life is on the line.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 7:27 pm
Posted on 10/1/26 at 7:36 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
He's on campus according to the article.
He was dressed for A&M. You can see him in the locker room next to Lane in the recap video posted the other day.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News