- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU basketball exhibition game vs Louisiana College tonight...Tigers win 132-44
Posted on 10/30/23 at 11:08 pm to Tom Bronco
Posted on 10/30/23 at 11:08 pm to Tom Bronco
quote:\
"It's only an exhibition game"
I agree that you have to temper expectations due to the level of competition and the fact its an exhibition, but I will say this:
LCU's players were playing hard and physical until the final whistle. Comparing our victory in this game to games we had last year, I think it means something to win against an NAIA school by 80 and look this good in terms of athleticism, moving the ball, communicating on defense, and not being stagnant on offense.
Bear in mind we were struggling to beat bottom feeders like UMKC, UT Arlington, and ETSU. All of these games were extremely close and we very well could have lost. I firmly believe this roster would beat those teams by 30+ points.
Additionally, I overheard someone at the game say they spoke to McMahon at the tipoff club dinner, and he said that the main issue last year was player loyalty. Unsurprising considering the lack of effort and chemistry midway through the season. Don't forget that our starting point guard quite literally quit the team.
Posted on 10/30/23 at 11:09 pm to lsugrad35
quote:
but I haven’t seen:
Hannibal
Fountain
Dean
dean has a shoulder something. fountain has a stomach but will be back for game 1, Hannibal is sick but should return to practice this week, according to coach postgame radio.
coach also mentioned 2 broken noses happened in practice, one of which might be the reason Collins is in the mask. says practice is intense, guys fighting to win playing time.
Posted on 10/30/23 at 11:50 pm to jamarr
quote:That was interesting. And at the same time...
coach also mentioned 2 broken noses happened in practice, one of which might be the reason Collins is in the mask. says practice is intense, guys fighting to win playing time.

Posted on 10/30/23 at 11:56 pm to mmcgrath
Anyway to watch highlights?
Posted on 10/31/23 at 12:13 am to gregory6592
132-44.
How many points did Van Lith score? (Yeah, I know it was the men playing)
How many points did Van Lith score? (Yeah, I know it was the men playing)
Posted on 10/31/23 at 3:20 am to semjase
LC Class of 1990 here
Proud of our kids. Didn't think we'd score that many
Oh, & as always...
Geaux Tigers!!
Proud of our kids. Didn't think we'd score that many
Oh, & as always...
Geaux Tigers!!
Posted on 10/31/23 at 3:22 am to semjase
We will have a good team next season if our guys stay . We have a great class coming in and the two frosh for this year are probably gonna be above average players. The sophomores are really high ceiling guys.
Next year will be the year to make some noise and you can probably add some good portal guys if this years team shows promise . As for this season , it will come down to how much the sophomores developed . They are our high ceiling guys along with the Kentucky transfer and the hope that the frehsmaen aren’t misses
Next year will be the year to make some noise and you can probably add some good portal guys if this years team shows promise . As for this season , it will come down to how much the sophomores developed . They are our high ceiling guys along with the Kentucky transfer and the hope that the frehsmaen aren’t misses
Posted on 10/31/23 at 6:59 am to Tigerpride18
Can we just agree that The Tigers may have the right team chemistry this year?
Posted on 10/31/23 at 7:09 am to tarzana
If Cook is eligible, this team may be better than a lot of people think .
Posted on 10/31/23 at 7:30 am to jamarr
quote:
coach also mentioned 2 broken noses happened in practice,
Jaime back on the practice squad?
Posted on 10/31/23 at 7:56 am to Septiger
quote:
If Cook is eligible, this team may be better than a lot of people think .
Cook is the key to this team potentially challenging on the bubble for a tourney spot or if ineligible might be slightly better than last year but still towards bottom of SEC. Frankly I just dont think there's another player on the team that can run the point/offense quite close to him. Stewart is short scorer and not so much a ball handler. Wiliams is just way too young for that main role on offense and wasnt much of an assist guy in high school either, so the offense will look a lot different with Cook on the floor vs. using Stewart/Williams running things.
This post was edited on 10/31/23 at 7:59 am
Posted on 10/31/23 at 9:19 am to Lester Earl
Fountain has a stomach...Corey has a Chest.
Glad to see the Tigers' lineup is anatomically sound!
Glad to see the Tigers' lineup is anatomically sound!
Posted on 10/31/23 at 9:36 am to tarzana
quote:
Can we just agree that The Tigers may have the right team chemistry this year?
WAAAY to early to draw such conclusions after a game against a woefully overmatched opponent. Let's just say it was a solid showing against an opponent LSU should have blown out of the gym. You're really encouraged by the play of Wright and Ward who seemed to pick up where they left off in the Bahamas games. A combined 9-14 from 3 is tremendous...regardless of the opponent. Also very encouraging was the lack of turnovers (11 total) in a game where LSU clearly had a lot of possessions. Even against weak competition last year LSU struggled with TOs early. That's a big reason (IMO) McMahon slowed down the tempo even though he's said he wants to play "fast". Mike Williams with 7 assists is nice to see as he will likely have to play a big role if Cook isn't eligible.
The only negatives where the first half FT shooting and the relatively lack of offensive rebounds for Baker, Reed and Collins (3 total). Granted, LSU only missed 18 FG attempts all game, so there wasn't a lot of opportunity. But you really want to see your bigs rebounding (which is one of my biggest concerns going into the season)
The schedule is a ramp up to the Charleston tournament where LSU will face A-10 favorite, Dayton, in the first game. That will be the first time we can really start to see what kind of team we might have.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 9:46 am to Alt26
I hate the negativity surrounding the program bc our fans had unrealistic expectations in year one after losing the vast majority of your roster. This is full rebuild. I'm hopeful to see improvement this year and be back to the tournament in year 3.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:04 am to redfishfan
quote:
I hate the negativity surrounding the program bc our fans had unrealistic expectations in year one after losing the vast majority of your roster.
I get what you are saying, but expectations last year were the lowest they had been in at least 6 years...and LSU fell WOEFULLY short of even those low expectations. There is a big difference between struggling with a new HC and largely new roster, and being the worst team in the league with the (tied) worst conference record in school history. McMahon significantly underachieved last year. So it is really hard to blame fans for being skeptical of he and his program at this point. He lost the benefit of the doubt and will have to earn it back.
quote:
This is full rebuild.
That is really becoming the nature of college basketball in general. Teams like Iowa St, Missouri, Kansas St. all had full rebuilds under new coaches too. Yet, they found a way to have success immediately. Because of the transfer rules and the ability for even just a few new players to completely change the trajectory of a team, it is unrealistic to think "rebuilds" should take years. Is that "unfair"? Maybe. But that's reality.
The flip side of that coin is that just because LSU had a terrible season last year it doesn't mean they can't have a MUCH better season this year because, by and large, this is a completely new roster.
quote:
I'm hopeful to see improvement this year and be back to the tournament in year 3.
Improvement isn't necessarily linear now because teams generally having to flip their rosters from year to year. It is entirely likely LSU will have 7-8 new players next season. Again, that is just the nature of the sport right now. So to expect this team to improve this season then carry it over to the next may be a bit unrealistic because many of the players on the team now may not be here next season.
McMahon looked overwhelmed last year in his first experience coaching in a major conference. The hope is that he learned a lot of lessons getting his nose bloodied game after game last year, and now he is much more prepared to take on the challenge this year.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:14 am to Lester Earl
Will Baker is no. 9? I thought in college basketball there were restrictions on numbers to 0-5, 10-15, 20-25, etc. Is that not the case?
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:16 am to Alt26
Starting to think we should see a starting lineup of Stewart/Ward/Wright/Reed/Baker
Worried about rebounding in the SEC, Baker is going to be a solid big but I don't think he is much of a rebounder, hopefully Wright and Mwani who I think are both good rebounders out of that 3 position should be able to help.
Seeing them shoot 65% from 3 is encouraging, no matter what the offense should be able to get some open 3s, so hopefully we can make up some of the differences in this category.
Worried about rebounding in the SEC, Baker is going to be a solid big but I don't think he is much of a rebounder, hopefully Wright and Mwani who I think are both good rebounders out of that 3 position should be able to help.
Seeing them shoot 65% from 3 is encouraging, no matter what the offense should be able to get some open 3s, so hopefully we can make up some of the differences in this category.
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:20 am to Manswers
quote:
Will Baker is no. 9? I thought in college basketball there were restrictions on numbers to 0-5, 10-15, 20-25, etc. Is that not the case?
They relaxed the rule and now numbers 0-99 are in play
Posted on 10/31/23 at 10:36 am to BrohemAlem11
Fact is LSU was close in lots of games last year and if they could simply hit some open 3's, they could have won 6 more games last year at minimum. I don't think they are that far from being a competitive team in the SEC and if we can just get consistent shooting/scoring this year they will be a better team by far.
Popular
Back to top



1



