- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:51 pm to Red Drum
quote:
What's the legal strategy behind asking this?
Grandstanding and throwing red meat out to the likes of Tiger Rant
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:51 pm to Lee Chatelain
quote:
Probably to try and get a rise out of Stanky - maybe he answers the question out of anger or emotion.
"YOU'RE DAMN RIGHT I HATE LSU! YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"
(spoken in Jack Nicholson's voice)
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:51 pm to PUB
quote:
Bigot brother in Nola? Seems to be qualified in NOLA.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm to w5oer
So this is done and waiting g for judge's ring?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm to Quatre Pot
quote:
There’s a process to these lawyers madness. First guy tries to get the witness off balance with tough questions and attacks, second guy is the good cop who’s just trying to understand, third guy asks leading questions to get a fatigued witness to admit to something accidentally
This seems pretty accurate. This second attorney is very boring going through sec policy and not trying to trip Sankey up on anything. At least not yet
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:52 pm to St Augustine
quote:
I’m no lawyer but I’d assume they’d try to bring this up AFTER they got Sankey on record about his position regarding pro vs amateur/ who can come back, etc.
They got him to admit that you can’t come back after “moving on”.
At some point I’d imagine they bring up all of the players that have done just that and are currently rostered in the conference. They will make him explain why they’re allowed and these players aren’t.
“They signed a contract” won’t be enough.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:53 pm to LesnarF5
This case and the fact that the SEC is suing LSU and Kiffin could very well be the impetus toward a Super Conference. LSU could lead the way. There's going to be a lot of bad blood for a long time since the SEC is trying to harm a founding member.
Sankey has a personal vendetta against Kiffin. I don't see how they can coexist after this.
Sankey has a personal vendetta against Kiffin. I don't see how they can coexist after this.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:53 pm to tigafan4life
quote:
So this is done and waiting g for judge's ring
Not even close. This will drag out for a few more hours. Sankey is still on the stand
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:54 pm to UnsureTiger
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:54 pm to CecildaDiesel
quote:
There is an exception for necessary expenses so room and board, meals, and injury insurance are not considered compensation is what I read I believe from Cole Hutson's suit
Compensation doesn't have to be monetary. The NCAA has been pretty clear about that.
Did anyone see a goalpost around here?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:55 pm to Red Drum
quote:
Last question Clayton asked was "do you hate LSU" Williams objected and there was no answer What's the legal strategy behind asking this?
It happens all the time on the Hill. Liberal is asked if a man can conceive a child. Liberal pleads the 5th. So the congressman asks if the carpet is blue. They plead the 5th again
He asked Sankey the most obviously easy question to answer for a conference commissioner. And Sankey abstained. That says everything about this situation.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:55 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Not even close. This will drag out for a few more hours. Sankey is still on the stand
How much battery do you have left and do you have on a Pee Sport 3.0? I can bring you one (unused).
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:55 pm to MintBerry Crunch
Was TC injunction only against NCAA and could the SEC deem him ineligible to play?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:56 pm to Shimoda
quote:
Even as an LSU fan, the SEC team's incompetence is annoying the shite out of me. Why on Earth would he object there? Now he just creates a clear situation where Sankey could not simple say he doesn't "hate" one of his member schools. That question would only hurt the SEC if he said something other than, "no." Maybe Williams believes Sankey is a moron and would have trouble saying no.
Exactly what I thought too. Terrible cross defense.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:57 pm to Thedillyplate
quote:
Was TC injunction only against NCAA and could the SEC deem him ineligible to play?
They filed a restraining order against the SEC and Sanky if memory serves
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:57 pm to Red Drum
Someone get this man Unsure a battery pack 
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:57 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Sankey Said he isn't aware of any particular players situation and it's not an issue about being a pro athlete but he thinks that if a player moves on then they have made their choice and should not be able to come back.
Did he torpedo their entire position? If it's not about them being a pro athlete then what is it about?
Leaving and coming back could cover a number of things such as someone that is kicked off one team and enrolls at another school, a kid that takes off time for personal reasons and later comes back, etc.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:58 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
younger abstention doctrine
Wouldn't that be why the SEC is claiming that LSU and Lane violated their Constitutional 1st A. rights?
Just asking....
Posted on 9/3/26 at 1:00 pm to Beau Fontenot
Sankey will be fired and LSU will own the SEC. This was a very dumb move by Sankey.
Popular
Back to top



0






