BayouCowboy

Rival's analyst Charles Power said he's the most accurate and polished. Also notes that Houston shows the ability to process better than most (ie the trait that can't be taught). Processing and accuracy are a great combo. A lot of very physically talented QBs look great until they are required to perform quickly and under pressure and then they fall apart.

I think Houston is a really good Russell Wilson comp. Same frame, DT ability, but not incredibly fast. Very smart player that can command the offense and make plays and has a live arm to hit tight windows.

I just watched his soph highlights. The kid is listed at 190 but plays like he's 220. He runs through and over defenders. I'm curious to see how much more he develops the next couple years. No one is going to want to tackle this kid.

Maybe our batters should use a golf club :lol:

quote:

---

Moscona’s locked on LSU said he’s likely committing to aTm soon.

---

Yesterday he didn't indicate that and Shea still says LSU (ie watch what they do). Corey's going full press so I still feel good about LSU

quote:

---

Making the playoffs energized the boosters and it’s working out amazing right now

---

After this season, LSU will be the "hotness" of CFB.

Get on the Lane train or get left behind! :pimp:

quote:

---

#1 WR E. Royal
#3 WR B. Easter
#11 WR M. Whitley
#42 WR A. Stevens
#12 ATH B. Calais

---

Calais is supposed to be committing today and Speigs thinks he chooses LSU. Not sure what time though.

quote:

---

Motivated player trumps any strength coach or program

---

Dare I say he has the "want" to be great? :lol:

Despite all the new faces on the roster this is the most confident I've felt going into week 1 in a very long time.

This Skip Bertman? :lol:

quote:

---

""The widespread assumption is that the material is still there. So we haven't seen - and not only us, I think in general all those observing the facility through satellite imagery and other means to see what's going on there - movement indicating that the material could have been transferred," Grossi ?said." -- Sounds like they really don't know one way or the other.

Then also it says, "All three Iranian uranium-enrichment plants known to have been operating - two at ?Natanz and one at Fordow - were destroyed or badly damaged in June." So what capabilities do they still have after the June attack?

---

Iran stated in negotiations with U.S. envoy Witkoff that they had 460kg of 60% enriched uranium, enough to make 11 nukes. To get to 90% enough for true weaponsm grade can be achieved in weeks . 3-5% enrichment is required for energy. Beyond 20% is approaching propulsion and 60% is "near weapons grade". The challenge is miniturization to put on a warhead and then delivery system with a survivable re-entry vehicle. That can take significantly longer. The question is, with their alliances with Russia and China and an already successful MRBM program, how long before they reach ICBM and MIRV capability?