- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live hearing thread
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:45 pm to tigafan4life
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:45 pm to tigafan4life
There is an exception for necessary expenses so room and board, meals, and injury insurance are not considered compensation is what I read I believe from Cole Hutson's suit
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:45 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:would be a mistake not to bring him up as it contradicts Sankey's position that once a player as moved on then he should be done
Not yet
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:45 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
by UnsureTiger
Apologize this is tough to follow.
Did he drill Sankey on his specific definition of an NFL player? What contracts are allowed? What practices are allowed?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:45 pm to Honkus
quote:
Around what time should we know about the final decision being made?
My guess is 4 or 5 but it's just a guess
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:45 pm to GeauxPanthers2
quote:
I hope Sankey has to hand us the trophy in Atlanta on December 5.
He’d be a bitch and would have his assistant do that. It would be too humiliating for him.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:46 pm to LSUGent
Just like goddell after Brady got suspended
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:46 pm to HarryHoudini
Ya know at this point f u c k the SEC and Skankey. I want LSU to ride this horse until the very end because it's the principle of the thing and LSU is right in this matter.
I know players and recruits are taking note of how LSU is fighting for these players.
I know players and recruits are taking note of how LSU is fighting for these players.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:46 pm to Hampton
quote:
Judge Sides with the SEC on "Improper Cumulation": In a significant initial victory for the conference, Judge Jorden sided with the SEC's argument that the lawsuit represents an "improper cumulation" of claims. The SEC successfully argued that out of the 44 total athlete plaintiffs, only 7 have any actual connection to an SEC school.What This Means: The judge ruled that the vast majority of the plaintiffs cannot bring claims against the SEC since they don't play for SEC teams. SEC attorney Jason Williams famously illustrated this to the judge by stating, "If someone slipped and fell in Walmart, you couldn't bring a suit against Costco."
In the grand scheme of things that’s meaningless. Not exactly a case winning argument for the SEC.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:47 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Most of Clayton's questions were objected to. He was very theatrical and honestly didn't do as good as I thought he would.
There’s a process to these lawyers madness. First guy tries to get the witness off balance with tough questions and attacks, second guy is the good cop who’s just trying to understand, third guy asks leading questions to get a fatigued witness to admit to something accidentally
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:47 pm to skullhawk
Bigot brother in Nola? Seems to be qualified in NOLA.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:47 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
the lawyer bringing up the texas guy and/or other examples? its a glaring question... god i hope he asked.
Not yet
What! That would have been near the top of my list.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:47 pm to RB10
quote:
The Federal Lawsuit: Rather than waiting for the state judge's ruling, the SEC has filed a federal suit in an attempt to block LSU from putting former NFL contracted players on its roster. The conference is escalating the battle to a higher court to protect its right to enforce its own bylaws.
So the SEC doesn’t have bylaws that says a player can’t have 6 years. Is that why They didn’t go after Vandy or Ole Miss when they are going against NCAA eligibility rules?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:47 pm to nicholastiger
The ultimate guest picker! That'd do some serious ratings numbers.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:47 pm to Buga
Smoke Laval just showed up outside the court room with the old Sammy's sign and a plate of wings for lunch
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:48 pm to Buga
quote:
Otherwise, this looks like a clown show from the prosecution.
There is no prosecution. There are plaintiffs (players) and defendants (NCAA/SEC/Stankey).
The next step after this is for the players' attorney to add all 15 ADs as co-defendants. This whole thing is stupid and makes me think the SEC attorneys are just a bunch of connected morons.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:48 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
The judge ruled that the vast majority of the plaintiffs cannot bring claims against the SEC since they don't play for SEC teams.
Which is bullshite.. what if they intend to play for an SEC team. SECs rules still apply to them even tho they played in another conference up until now.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:48 pm to nicholastiger
quote:As the guest picker
the judge will appear on Gameday and make the final decision
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:49 pm to lsu711
quote:
Apologize this is tough to follow.
Did he drill Sankey on his specific definition of an NFL player? What contracts are allowed? What practices are allowed?
I'm trying to sneak and type because of the amount of deputies in the courtroom. Many have left out so it's easier now. He did not ask about definition of an NFL player or definition of a pro in general. He only used overseas players as examples. I think Tony could have done much better. He was more focused on theatrics.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:50 pm to Buga
quote:
What! That would have been near the top of my list.
I’m no lawyer but I’d assume they’d try to bring this up AFTER they got Sankey on record about his position regarding pro vs amateur/ who can come back, etc.
Popular
Back to top


1






