- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Live hearing thread
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:31 pm to Fat Bastard
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:31 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
Last question Clayton asked was "do you hate LSU" Williams objected and there was no answer
What's the legal strategy behind asking this?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:31 pm to Shimoda
quote:
Again, the SEC is escalating a fight where they have much, much more to lose with fairly tight odds. This is a stupid play by the conference. They are willing to risk blatant RICO violations to fight a one-year problem involving 7 players.
They need better advisors
Whether right or wrong, the league and its attorneys believe that this precedent will open the door for any "professional" still within that 5-for-5 window to return to college athletics by citing this case.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:31 pm to More beer please
quote:
So what about the other players on SEC rosters that did exactly that?
Yeah no one cares about that for some reason.
This is all orchestrated to keep the focus off of how badly the NCAA fricked this up. They've even got chancellors of universities chiming in sounded like ignorant fricks for not including all NCAA schools, much less not including the other SEC schools that are doing he exact same thing.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:31 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
but he thinks that if a player moves on then they have made their choice and should not be able to come back.
Like the kid at Texas?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:31 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
Sankey Said he isn't aware of any particular players situation and it's not an issue about being a pro athlete but he thinks that if a player moves on then they have made their choice and should not be able to come back.
What about the players that moved on and then came back already?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:32 pm to lsuhunt555
Someone needs to ask what does move in from college mean? 
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:32 pm to Red Drum
quote:
"do you hate LSU"
quote:
What's the legal strategy behind asking this?
That's what I was wondering.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:32 pm to 756
quote:
Kiffin's public statements about recruiting those players against him.
After the court ruled the players get a 5th year, yes he recruited.
The suit is a farce and should be dismissed.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:32 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
if a player moves on then they have made their choice
There was no choice to be had you dumb fricking frick
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:32 pm to lsuhunt555
If Tony Clayton did not individually use Cole Hutson's name in a question, he's doing it wrong.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:32 pm to lsuhunt555
quote:
Like the kid at Texas?
Or Missouri or Mississippi State or the one at Kentucky. It's all over the conference. Keith Carter even admitted that they were looking to recruit these guys.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:33 pm to 756
quote:
In its filing, the SEC says LSU and coach Lane Kiffin "began an orchestrated campaign to recruit professional athletes to join the LSU football roster" and uses Kiffin's public statements about recruiting those players against him.
Because a court ruled and provided an injunction for those players to be eligible. How can you sue him for going by what a court order says?
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:33 pm to lsuhunt555
quote:
Whether right or wrong, the league and its attorneys believe that this precedent will open the door for any "professional" still within that 5-for-5 window to return to college athletics by citing this case.
I agree with this
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:33 pm to TigerLunatik
Forgive me if this has been posted, but it appears the SEC has brought this to federal court now
The Federal Lawsuit: Rather than waiting for the state judge's ruling, the SEC has filed a federal suit in an attempt to block LSU from putting former NFL contracted players on its roster. The conference is escalating the battle to a higher court to protect its right to enforce its own bylaws.
The Federal Lawsuit: Rather than waiting for the state judge's ruling, the SEC has filed a federal suit in an attempt to block LSU from putting former NFL contracted players on its roster. The conference is escalating the battle to a higher court to protect its right to enforce its own bylaws.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:33 pm to Buga
1.see if he responds
2. Expose elephant in room
2. Expose elephant in room
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:33 pm to More beer please
quote:
So what about the other players on SEC rosters that did exactly that?
They'll say they "just attended unpaid minicamp(s)" and never "signed a contract"... even though they undoubtedly to sign a shite load of paperwork to step foot on a practice field or facility
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:33 pm to Red Drum
This is fricking awesome. God as my witness I love LSU.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:34 pm to UnsureTiger
quote:
ast question Clayton asked was "do you hate LSU" Williams objected and there was no answer
I can answer this one for Tony. Williams is a Tulane grad who hates white people.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:34 pm to IM_4_LSU
quote:
Majority of college sports radio guys are claiming this morning sec will win this in a land slide.
Just taking their PR marching orders and talking points from their daddy.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:34 pm to 756
quote:
In its filing, the SEC says LSU and coach Lane Kiffin "began an orchestrated campaign to recruit professional athletes to join the LSU football roster" and uses Kiffin's public statements about recruiting those players against him.
Correct me if I won’t, but weren’t Kiffins public comments made AFTER the initial TRO was signed. The TRO gave them eligibility, and were therefore fair game to recruit?
Popular
Back to top


13









