Started By
Message

re: Live hearing thread

Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:25 pm to
Posted by Greace
Member since May 2009
4859 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:25 pm to
There's no way that's correct. It's just making up nonsense
Posted by tigafan4life
Member since Dec 2006
51146 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

player moves on then they have made their choice and should not be able to come back.
except that the ncaa made a rule that effected these guys choices.
Posted by JaydensMom
Member since Aug 2026
6 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:26 pm to
Lol I dont even understand why he showed up
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
47204 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:26 pm to
"Not an issue about being a pro athlete."


Uh.....then what are we here for?

Dude sucks at lying
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 12:27 pm
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46642 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:26 pm to
How can you police “professionals” from playing if you can’t even define what a professional is?
Posted by Hampton
Member since Oct 2020
2725 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:26 pm to
It got it from WAFB channel 9
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
16031 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:26 pm to
Because he is a narcissist
Posted by themunch
in motion
Member since Jan 2007
72653 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:27 pm to
"has already harmed the conference and threatens to cause further substantial harm if not curbed."
you know what curbing is right? Lane has to be on a leash.
Posted by UnsureTiger
Member since Apr 2023
123 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

except that the ncaa made a rule that effected these guys choices.


I agree but that was his statement
Posted by tigafan4life
Member since Dec 2006
51146 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:27 pm to
He doesnt know what a pro or amateur is.
Posted by Shimoda
Member since Jul 2026
50 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

In its lawsuit against LSU, the SEC says the schools conduct "has already harmed the conference and threatens to cause further substantial harm if not curbed."


Again, the SEC is escalating a fight where they have much, much more to lose with fairly tight odds. This is a stupid play by the conference. They are willing to risk blatant RICO violations to fight a one-year problem involving 7 players.

They need better advisors
Posted by Red Drum
Coast
Member since Sep 2007
1970 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Asked sankey about 91 basketball overseas pros who are allowed to play in ncaa.

Sankey said they played overseas for clubs and other things that may not specifically be professional leagues.

Sankey also said he does not know the definition of pro for those players


Is this relevant to the SEC's case that they can create and enforce whatever rules/regs they want, and that membership is voluntary? That's their stance. Doesn't really matter here what they consider professional. It's should they be forced to not hold accountable a member institution for violating their rules.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13692 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Sankey Said he isn't aware of any particular players situation and it's not an issue about being a pro athlete but he thinks that if a player moves on then they have made their choice and should not be able to come back.


Yet his rule allowed the UT OL to come back after that explicit thing. He just contradicted himself.

Wow, this guy is an idiot and can't seem to stop stepping on his own dick.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
92620 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Last question Clayton asked was "do you hate LSU" Williams objected and there was no answer

\
judge shoulda said OVER RULED instead of sustained.

answer the fricking question u skank!

Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25803 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:29 pm to
Their stance is they can’t define what a pro is outside of the US, and increasingly it’s being shown they can’t prove what that is in the US either.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20843 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

he thinks that if a player moves on then they have made their choice and should not be able to come back.


Well he just fricked himself with that one
Posted by 756
Member since Sep 2004
16031 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:29 pm to
In its filing, the SEC says LSU and coach Lane Kiffin "began an orchestrated campaign to recruit professional athletes to join the LSU football roster" and uses Kiffin's public statements about recruiting those players against him.
Posted by Shimoda
Member since Jul 2026
50 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:29 pm to
They are effectively trying to create a shoe-horned rule targeting these specific players. Sankey's testimony is likely going to cost the SEC some $$$. The timing if their lawsuit against Lane is laughably bad, too, and not for us.
Posted by More beer please
Member since Feb 2010
46642 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:30 pm to
So what about the other players on SEC rosters that did exactly that?
Posted by WhoGeaux
Member since Apr 2011
5573 posts
Posted on 9/3/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

In its filing, the SEC says LSU and coach Lane Kiffin "began an orchestrated campaign to recruit professional athletes to join the LSU football roster" and uses Kiffin's public statements about recruiting those players against him.


Even if he did, there is no law or rule that would be broken by doing so.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram