- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:11 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
um, then what it the argument? because they are literally arguing whether or not they can play College Football.
The constitutional right in this case is the right to the courts protections not the protections themselves.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:12 pm to Honkus
Got a lil Jackie Chiles in him.
That’s what I was thinking.
Also a smidge of Algonquin J Calhoun. For any old timers.
I loved that he mispronounced Sanky twice. Then said, “what ever his name is”.
Yet, he included Sanky in the court documents. Hope he spelled it right in the docs.
Also a smidge of Algonquin J Calhoun. For any old timers.
I loved that he mispronounced Sanky twice. Then said, “what ever his name is”.
Yet, he included Sanky in the court documents. Hope he spelled it right in the docs.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:25 pm to drizztiger
So you want the College Athletics Agency under the auspices of the EEOC or the DoL? Because that's the logical outcome of this mess. Along with a new Players Union with CBAs.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:29 pm to Good Times
Tony is an incredible trial attorney. He likes to give off the impression that he is winging it (doesn't know people's names, etc...) but he's setting traps the whole time. Juries eat him up. SEC will have their hands full.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:30 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
So you want the College Athletics Agency under the auspices of the EEOC or the DoL? Because that's the logical outcome of this mess. Along with a new Players Union with CBAs.
get Congress to actually do something.
That's the only way this all gets resolved in a way that *may* satisfy most people and will actually have teeth.
People need to start focusing their anger on the right entity.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:32 pm to KiwiHead
quote:What are you talking about? You are blaming people for tempting the Feds to get involved when you completely ignore that the Feds have already been involved and have a bill constructed.
So you want the College Athletics Agency under the auspices of the EEOC or the DoL?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:33 pm to Honkus
Bet they wish Tony was still in the public sphere.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:34 pm to Eyebesmacinhose
quote:
No constitutional right to play college football, Tony
You big dummy.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:36 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Damn, you fukkers are just begging for the Feds to get involved with legislation.
Damn, you are dumb as hell.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:37 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Damn, you fukkers are just begging for the Feds to get involved with legislation.
Then the destruction of the game will be complete with attorneys judges and politicians being explicitly involved in their official capacities.
it's the only way to solve it.
The cat is out of the box, it ain't going back in
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:45 pm to drizztiger
So you want the Feds involved? You want them involved in orchestrating rule changes on holding, interference penalties and targeting fouls as well? If not, why not? You've already invited them in on what constitutes an eligible player.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:49 pm to KiwiHead
quote:I didn’t ask or do jack shite and it’s completely irrelevant as to the point that the Feds are already and have been already involved.
So you want the Feds involved? You want them involved in orchestrating rule changes on holding, interference penalties and targeting fouls as well? If not, why not? You've already invited them in on what constitutes an eligible player.
Can you not follow your own points?
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:58 pm to drizztiger
Doucet/Clayton Interview
Pretty good interview from today where Tony explains their arguments in the 2022 class and RJ Luis injunctions
Pretty good interview from today where Tony explains their arguments in the 2022 class and RJ Luis injunctions
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:05 pm to stuckintexas
quote:
Funny picture, but AI should know which way exit signs face
They already have the football hardware in the car. Presumably they could have the basketball too. But yeah.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:14 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
So you want the Feds involved? You want them involved in orchestrating rule changes on holding, interference penalties and targeting fouls as well? If not, why not? You've already invited them in on what constitutes an eligible player.
You don't even understand that the NCAA and by proxy the SEC and other conferences invited this ruling in with a big red carpet by waiting and announcing the 5 for 5 ruling when they did.
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:20 pm to SCTigah
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:20 pm to Ryan3232
quote:
This has been a wild preseason
The wildest of all time by any program ever
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:30 pm to SCTigah
I believe the SEC knew this would be the case all along.
Make a scene and act like they care, then let the courts do their thing and the SEC and universities save face while stacking up on NFL Talent.
Make a scene and act like they care, then let the courts do their thing and the SEC and universities save face while stacking up on NFL Talent.
Popular
Back to top

0








