Started By
Message

re: Let ‘em play! New ruling by Louisiana judge

Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:09 pm to
Posted by AkronTiger
2025 NFL Survivor Champion
Member since May 2021
3230 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Do you really think the CFP is going to exclude LSU if we are 10-2, 11-1 or better?


I don’t know.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
25967 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

um, then what it the argument? because they are literally arguing whether or not they can play College Football.


The constitutional right in this case is the right to the courts protections not the protections themselves.
Posted by Good Times
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
25086 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:12 pm to
Got a lil Jackie Chiles in him.

That’s what I was thinking.

Also a smidge of Algonquin J Calhoun. For any old timers.

I loved that he mispronounced Sanky twice. Then said, “what ever his name is”.

Yet, he included Sanky in the court documents. Hope he spelled it right in the docs.
This post was edited on 8/28/26 at 4:26 pm
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38624 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:25 pm to
So you want the College Athletics Agency under the auspices of the EEOC or the DoL? Because that's the logical outcome of this mess. Along with a new Players Union with CBAs.
Posted by HoopyD
Member since Nov 2004
3470 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:29 pm to
Tony is an incredible trial attorney. He likes to give off the impression that he is winging it (doesn't know people's names, etc...) but he's setting traps the whole time. Juries eat him up. SEC will have their hands full.
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15706 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

So you want the College Athletics Agency under the auspices of the EEOC or the DoL? Because that's the logical outcome of this mess. Along with a new Players Union with CBAs.



get Congress to actually do something.

That's the only way this all gets resolved in a way that *may* satisfy most people and will actually have teeth.

People need to start focusing their anger on the right entity.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
48747 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

So you want the College Athletics Agency under the auspices of the EEOC or the DoL?
What are you talking about? You are blaming people for tempting the Feds to get involved when you completely ignore that the Feds have already been involved and have a bill constructed.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36703 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:33 pm to
Bet they wish Tony was still in the public sphere.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36703 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

No constitutional right to play college football, Tony


You big dummy.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36703 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Damn, you fukkers are just begging for the Feds to get involved with legislation.


Damn, you are dumb as hell.
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15706 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Damn, you fukkers are just begging for the Feds to get involved with legislation.

Then the destruction of the game will be complete with attorneys judges and politicians being explicitly involved in their official capacities.


it's the only way to solve it.

The cat is out of the box, it ain't going back in
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38624 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:45 pm to
So you want the Feds involved? You want them involved in orchestrating rule changes on holding, interference penalties and targeting fouls as well? If not, why not? You've already invited them in on what constitutes an eligible player.
Posted by drizztiger
Deal With it!
Member since Mar 2007
48747 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

So you want the Feds involved? You want them involved in orchestrating rule changes on holding, interference penalties and targeting fouls as well? If not, why not? You've already invited them in on what constitutes an eligible player.
I didn’t ask or do jack shite and it’s completely irrelevant as to the point that the Feds are already and have been already involved.

Can you not follow your own points?
Posted by HoopyD
Member since Nov 2004
3470 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 4:58 pm to
Doucet/Clayton Interview

Pretty good interview from today where Tony explains their arguments in the 2022 class and RJ Luis injunctions
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18685 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Funny picture, but AI should know which way exit signs face


They already have the football hardware in the car. Presumably they could have the basketball too. But yeah.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18685 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

So you want the Feds involved? You want them involved in orchestrating rule changes on holding, interference penalties and targeting fouls as well? If not, why not? You've already invited them in on what constitutes an eligible player.


You don't even understand that the NCAA and by proxy the SEC and other conferences invited this ruling in with a big red carpet by waiting and announcing the 5 for 5 ruling when they did.
Posted by sppy1
Sugar Land, Texas
Member since Nov 2012
151 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:20 pm to
Posted by T1gerNate
Member since Feb 2020
4064 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

This has been a wild preseason


The wildest of all time by any program ever
Posted by Safety Blitz
The Backfield
Member since May 2022
3750 posts
Posted on 8/28/26 at 5:30 pm to
I believe the SEC knew this would be the case all along.

Make a scene and act like they care, then let the courts do their thing and the SEC and universities save face while stacking up on NFL Talent.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram