- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/3/25 at 12:50 pm to ChEgrad
There are smart folks with computers (and AI) analyzing every possible decision. I'm sure this is based on a CFB-wide analysis, perhaps adjusted for LSU personnel and statistical trends (which admittedly would be a smaller sample for the current team).
Posted on 9/3/25 at 2:20 pm to ChEgrad
quote:I'd think your short yards proficiency needs to be in analytic decisions, not just use all CFB or even FBS %,
So, how in depth/accurate are these analytics?
Posted on 9/3/25 at 2:25 pm to Kingshakabooboo
Can't be said enough. Points on the road in a hostile environment are hard to come by. No time on the clock and they get the ball coming out of the half. TAKE THE POINTS!!
Posted on 9/3/25 at 2:27 pm to ChEgrad
quote:
But which analytics?
DEEZ NUTZ analytics boy
Posted on 9/3/25 at 2:29 pm to ChEgrad
Analytics are much more useful in the NFL where the talent difference is much smaller.
Fourth and goal from the 2 would be much more difficult for LSU against Ohio State than against La Tech. You have to factor in the opposition with the average odds of success against all teams.
Fourth and goal from the 2 would be much more difficult for LSU against Ohio State than against La Tech. You have to factor in the opposition with the average odds of success against all teams.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 2:37 pm to ChEgrad
quote:I generally like being aggressive and not automatically punting on 4th down, but so much depends on time and place.
Kelly says analytics says to go for it on fourth down. But which analytics?
In a low scoring game, on the road, points are at a premium. So take the FG and go into halftime with momentum.
BK made the wrong decision, and I thought so before he ran the play.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 3:04 pm to ChEgrad
In isolation, going for it there wasn't necessarily a bad call. But when you've lost 3 straight opening games and EACH had a situation where you were stopped on 4th down instead of taking a FG, I agree, you may have to discard "analytics" there and do something different to try to get a different result.
No one can say how the game goes if LSU takes 3 there instead of getting stopped on 4th down. But if the second half goes the same 10-6 turns into 13-10 which turns into 20-10. A two-score game would have been massive late instead of putting your defense in an extreme pressure spot
No one can say how the game goes if LSU takes 3 there instead of getting stopped on 4th down. But if the second half goes the same 10-6 turns into 13-10 which turns into 20-10. A two-score game would have been massive late instead of putting your defense in an extreme pressure spot
Posted on 9/3/25 at 3:47 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Fans love analytic decisions when they work but hate them when they don’t, which isn’t how decisions work.
Generally true, but in this circumstance, there was only one right decision
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:20 pm to ChEgrad
They’re BS, just an excuse when coaches frick up.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:21 pm to ChEgrad
What about with the clock expiring and no timeouts left?
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:24 pm to Sofaking2
There’s a million different factors that would go into it and there’s 100% chance what he’s referring to did not apply to the situation on Saturday.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:26 pm to ChEgrad
yeah i get that in general its more likely to get the first down on the 40 yard line with 2 yards to go then punt the ball away and not allow 2 first downs. And I'm sure any strategic thinking, or analytics would tell you that. However that 4th down with 15 secs with no timeouts was just dumb and saying analytics told you to do it is even dumber.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:29 pm to Sofaking2
You had to score twice to win the game anyway. Only relevant “analytic” in that situation.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:32 pm to ChEgrad
Analytics my arse!
History of bonehead calls going for it on 4th down with bullshite play calls.
You need to look at a few things- timing, momentum, situation, and time left in the game. There was only 15 seconds left and the only timeout we had he used it before the stupid 4th down play call.
You kick the ball and get 3 points with momentum into halftime. Because even if you make it, you have to throw it in the endzone because if you get tackled in bounds, time runs out and you have time for 1-2 plays max.
Better to kick the FG and get 3 points before halftime.
History of bonehead calls going for it on 4th down with bullshite play calls.
You need to look at a few things- timing, momentum, situation, and time left in the game. There was only 15 seconds left and the only timeout we had he used it before the stupid 4th down play call.
You kick the ball and get 3 points with momentum into halftime. Because even if you make it, you have to throw it in the endzone because if you get tackled in bounds, time runs out and you have time for 1-2 plays max.
Better to kick the FG and get 3 points before halftime.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:40 pm to Dubaitiger
Stack points until the deficit outnumbers the possessions needed. It isn’t that difficult.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:46 pm to ChEgrad
quote:
So, how in depth/accurate are these analytics? Are they based on LSU results only?
BK also said he misinterpreted the Analytics because if factors in the number of plays you can run after that play. He said for the analytics to be favorable we meeded time yo run 4-5 more plays if successful on 4th down.
He admitted he should have kicked the FG.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 4:50 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
He admitted he should have kicked the FG.
He should have kicked the field goal IMO. But I also liked the fact that Nuss was begging to go for it and he let his QB have a chance to convert and see if he could handle business...which he didn't.
Posted on 9/3/25 at 5:48 pm to ChEgrad
quote:
Kelly says analytics says to go for it on fourth down. But which analytics?
he already admitted it was a bad judgement on his part...
15 seconds left in the half
the gain of getting a first down still is a big problem with no timeouts...
maybe 1 maybe 2 pass plays then you have to run your FG team out there...
lot of downside to that gamble
Popular
Back to top


0




