
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Attorney for players once bound for LSU plans legal action against SEC, Greg Sankey
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
You must be the worst lawyer in Louisiana
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The SEC being sued is the most crucial part. That's what distinguishes this from all the previous matters.
they got accept that if they are going to be regulator, for the first time, that they will have to go to court sometimes. If they don't like that, leave it up to the NCAA to get their arse kicked in court.
or they can figure out a way to share revenue with players, force them to sign contracts and enfore elgiblity but they don't want that.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:27 pm to GRTiger
quote:
The answer to your original question remains "yes, absolutely."
Where are the other suits against the SEC?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:29 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
they got accept that if they are going to be regulator, for the first time, that they will have to go to court sometimes.
I think they're fine with this as long as its not in a state court potentially sympathetic to the school/player
quote:
If they don't like that, leave it up to the NCAA to get their arse kicked in court.
They're using their relationship with the other members of the conference to fill in the gaps that have been exposed in NCAA enforcement authority.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
Wydett Williams (Ole Miss)
Trent Hendrick (James Madison)
TJ Harden (SMU)
Anthony Hankerson (Oregon State)
Blake Cotton (Utah)
DQ Smith (South Carolina)
Brylan Green (Arkansas)
Luke Drzewiecki (Minnesota)
Ckelby Givens (Southern)
Here are a couple of the plaintiffs from that case.
Not that this is relevant given
Trent Hendrick (James Madison)
TJ Harden (SMU)
Anthony Hankerson (Oregon State)
Blake Cotton (Utah)
DQ Smith (South Carolina)
Brylan Green (Arkansas)
Luke Drzewiecki (Minnesota)
Ckelby Givens (Southern)
Here are a couple of the plaintiffs from that case.
Not that this is relevant given
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think they're fine with this as long as its not in a state court potentially sympathetic to the school/player
just a federal court with an alabama grad judge?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:45 pm to Dire Wolf
It would be funny if there was a vote to establish a specific court to hear member grievances or attempts to affect rules, and clearly it would be in Alabama 
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think they're fine with this as long as its not in a state court potentially sympathetic to the school/player
I’m sorry did I miss the SEC filing a motion to change venue
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:58 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Sankey probably sucks at chess and poker.....
Posted on 9/9/26 at 1:28 pm to FireawayLSU
quote:
You’re the worst poster on this entire site. You say shite just to get attention. Wright testified under Oath Ole Piss contacted him first. So you come in here and think LSU is the only one doing wrong. You’re a complete and utter moron.
He's the "Annoyatron" of Tigerdroppings. He wouldn't be so bad if he posted like a normal person, but he posts, and posts and posts all with contrary opinions.
Hard to tell what's the highest. His post count, his opinion of his opinions, or his opinion of his "superiority".
He should have had to sit in the corner for a year, but he would have probably whacked himself, since this place is his life.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 1:53 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Just like I said, there is a great starting complaint/petition on the SEC Rant with discovery I would be glad to email him
Posted on 9/9/26 at 1:55 pm to TutHillTiger
I can’t wait to see the response to the subpoena to Dellenger
Posted on 9/9/26 at 1:59 pm to tonydtigr
quote:
He should have had to sit in the corner for a year
He'd just make alters. Hell, captdalton and boom33 are probably alters already as terrible as they are
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:13 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Sankey asked for this, he will lose.
Should have just shut the frick up and saved face.
Now he will get roasted in court again and the SEc will ask him to step down.
Pride cometh be for the fall.
Should have just shut the frick up and saved face.
Now he will get roasted in court again and the SEc will ask him to step down.
Pride cometh be for the fall.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:13 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I can also see a future dispute arising from this. I have no doubt the players will win judgements and the SEC will have to pay millions of dollars. There will be a huge brawl when the SEC says LSU has to pay their fair share of this judgement. LSU is the only school fighting for the players and should not have to share in any part of this judgement.
It's actually gonna be entertaining
It's actually gonna be entertaining
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
When Kiffin talked to the players, this situation was that they would be held eligible to play. There was no rule broken at the time. The important action was when LSU announced that the players wouldn’t be removed from the roster consistent with the stupidity passed by the 15/16 SEC presidents.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
"The only dirt......" Wright has said that 4 other League school were recruiting him "hard". During all the legal mess against LSU was going on. Did The SEC know this? S. Carolina had one enrolled in school. Depositions would be interesting , as well getting Sankey back on the stand for more grilling.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 2:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
Timing is very important in proving "collusion."
On August 19, 2026 dozens of players filed suit against the NCAA in Baton Rouge in an attempt to get another year of eligibility.
On August 25, 2026 the SEC passed a NEW rule barring SEC schools from rostering any athlete who signed a professional contract, appeared on a professional roster (such as the NFL, NBA, G League, or WNBA), or failed to properly withdraw after entering a professional draft.
SUBSEQUENT to the SEC rule change, certain plaintiffs (such as Dae'Quan Wright and Zxavian Harris) amended their complaints to name the SEC as a co-defendant just before or during the high-stakes preliminary injunction hearing on September 3.
Do you think, after the SEC vote on Aug 25th, that Lane Kiffin called Tony Clayton, the defendants' attorney and "colluded", saying, "Tony, I realize you went to law school, but in light of the SEC's new rule on rosters, don't you think you should add the SEC to these two players complaint"...
or maybe, JUST MAYBE, it was solely the idea of their attorneys?
Does this appear to be collusion by LSU, Kiffin, et al, against the SEC?
On August 19, 2026 dozens of players filed suit against the NCAA in Baton Rouge in an attempt to get another year of eligibility.
On August 25, 2026 the SEC passed a NEW rule barring SEC schools from rostering any athlete who signed a professional contract, appeared on a professional roster (such as the NFL, NBA, G League, or WNBA), or failed to properly withdraw after entering a professional draft.
SUBSEQUENT to the SEC rule change, certain plaintiffs (such as Dae'Quan Wright and Zxavian Harris) amended their complaints to name the SEC as a co-defendant just before or during the high-stakes preliminary injunction hearing on September 3.
Do you think, after the SEC vote on Aug 25th, that Lane Kiffin called Tony Clayton, the defendants' attorney and "colluded", saying, "Tony, I realize you went to law school, but in light of the SEC's new rule on rosters, don't you think you should add the SEC to these two players complaint"...
or maybe, JUST MAYBE, it was solely the idea of their attorneys?
Does this appear to be collusion by LSU, Kiffin, et al, against the SEC?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:19 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Bro you have historically bad takes lol. 445 downvotes.. geez.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:26 pm to EulerRules
Collusion is nothing compared to antitrust, civil rico, and intentional interference with contract and not a defense to that either.

Popular
Back to top



0











