Started By
Message

UPDATE: RJ Luis granted injunction

Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:09 pm
Posted by Nitrogen
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Aug 2016
9816 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:09 pm
tGeneral gets what he wants

This post was edited on 8/24/26 at 6:57 pm
Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
605 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

gets what he wants


Please God
Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
605 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:17 pm to
I am curious and maybe someone knows the answer, assuming this is a "temporary" injunction, could the follow up hearing fall some time during the season and then have to vacate any games he took part in? That's the only concern I have assuming they grant this ... Hopefully someone who knows more than I do can provide some reassurance
Posted by bubbz
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
23139 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:20 pm to
Haha this is being decided in BR?
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lakewood Colorado
Member since Sep 2017
33343 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:25 pm to
it will be a while before it goes back to court if granted
Posted by wryder1
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2008
5026 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:35 pm to
This is no different than Trinidad Chambliss getting his case brought in front of an Ole Miss alumni judge. It’s all a joke and should be treated as such until the NCAA is disbanded. They brought this upon themselves with their unequal punishment of rule breakers, dragging their feet on cases with athletes and etc. They had their time to shine and abused their power. Now they’re being mocked and shown to be the fool they’ve always been.
Posted by Tellem
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
1128 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:52 pm to
By Judge Ronald Johnson as well
Posted by Dylan
Bayou Barbary
Member since May 2009
3790 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:01 pm to
The judge is a Southern grad.
Posted by Pnels08
Member since Jul 2014
10661 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:04 pm to
shite I'll get my check book out.
Posted by The Truth 34
Chavez Ravine
Member since May 2010
41855 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Judge Ronald Johnson


Your honor, get RJ in that gold jersey, mayne!
Posted by NotaStarGazer
Member since Dec 2023
3158 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:50 pm to
I will point out the EXACT MOMENT that the NCAA "jumped the shark". Remember when several UNC basketball players were found to have taken a FICTIONAL class for credit? That obvious very, very serious infraction was discovered and you remember how they ruled? They said "because that 'class' was taken also by non-athletes, there would be no punishment." There was absolutely NO punishment...no probation of any kind.

Here is what SHOULD have occurred. ALL the students (athletes and non-athletes) who took that non-existent class and obviously got credits for it should have been EXPELLED!! No appeal heard...blatant CHEATING of the highest order. If that had been Louisiana Tech, the Bulldogs would still be on probation .
Posted by jamarr
Member since Jul 2019
1840 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:52 am to
seems like wade is timing this things so the judge gives him eligibility and then he can delay it until the season is over, then who cares. vacated games don't mean shite
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21702 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 7:45 am to
quote:

I am curious and maybe someone knows the answer, assuming this is a "temporary" injunction, could the follow up hearing fall some time during the season and then have to vacate any games he took part in? That's the only concern I have assuming they grant this ... Hopefully someone who knows more than I do can provide some reassurance


No. See the Charles Bediako case.
Posted by Portcityblues
Member since Jan 2017
1783 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 8:35 am to
If they go back and vacate our ncaa title they can’t take it from my memory and we can still hang a banner
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
9552 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I am curious and maybe someone knows the answer, assuming this is a "temporary" injunction, could the follow up hearing fall some time during the season and then have to vacate any games he took part in? That's the only concern I have assuming they grant this ... Hopefully someone who knows more than I do can provide some reassurance


A preliminary injunction is longer lasting than a temporary injunction or TRO. If he's granted a preliminary injunction, the chances of that being changed before the end of March is pretty low.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
22318 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 11:22 am to
quote:

This is no different than Trinidad Chambliss getting his case brought in front of an Ole Miss alumni judge.


But this is a Southern grad judge that isn't going up for re-election due to age.

He might not have the same motivations as the Ole Miss judge.

Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
605 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 11:32 am to
quote:

preliminary injunction is longer lasting than a temporary injunction or TRO.


I understand that, I just am curious why Bediakos second hearing was like 3 weeks later in his situation. Hopefully if he's granted this one they can delay the follow up if that's the direction we are going
Posted by king47
Member since Aug 2020
2279 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Haha this is being decided in BR?


Something tells me that might not exactly be a good thing for us. Especially it being a southern grad.

We should have picked some small town court in Houma??
Posted by JayVegas702
Las Vegas
Member since Oct 2025
605 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Especially it being a southern grad


His twin brother graduated from LSU law and is also a judge. I think this looks less sketchy if he grants it than if it had gone in front of his brother. I know it's supposed to be randomly assigned but I think we all know that's not always the case. I think we got in front of someone who we feel very good about... Just my opinion
Posted by ellessuuuu
Member since Sep 2004
9552 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

I understand that, I just am curious why Bediakos second hearing was like 3 weeks later in his situation.


Because Bediako received a TRO which is only good for 10-20 days. A preliminary injunction on the other hand is basically a mini-trial and lasts until the entire case can be heard later. Usually there is no later trial because the Judge has already told you how he intends to rule.

Looks like Luis chose not to pursue a TRO and focus solely on the preliminary injunction.
This post was edited on 8/19/26 at 1:02 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram