- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not done in the portal for OL
Posted on 12/31/24 at 7:39 am to wadewilson
Posted on 12/31/24 at 7:39 am to wadewilson
fair enough....my bad
0
Posted on 12/31/24 at 8:59 am to ProjectP2294
quote:Would you say the same about wr since LSU signed 2 ?
If he's making that comment after 15 bowl practices, they don't feel good about the development of some of the young guys on the roster.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 9:05 am to MFn GIMP
Chester and Mubenga need to be religated to backups
Posted on 12/31/24 at 9:19 am to lostinbr
quote:THIS pretty much sums it up. It seems obvious that CBK is wanting to have as many elite dudes ready for next year as possible. Not just OL but all over the field. We'll see...
At some point the guys have to earn playing time. Competition is a good thing. It makes guys work harder, and it helps the cream rise to the top.
If all other things are equal then sure, play the younger player. But that’s rarely the case.
Some of these guys are going to leave as RS SO and RS JR no matter what. That’s just the nature of the game nowadays. I think you can get into trouble trying to make roster decisions based on who is likely to transfer a year+ later. Just my opinion, though.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 9:25 am to kajunman
quote:
Would you say the same about wr since LSU signed 2 ?
Since he didn't comment that we're targeting more WRs, I'd say he had enough evidence of need before the bowl practices started and apparently feels good about where we are with that position group.
He was probably looking for very specific things during the bowl practices, and when he didn't see what he wanted out of some guys, in regards to how they can contribute next year specifically, he said we need to get more help there.
My whole statement is based needing more than we've already gotten. Additional targets. Because this is based on the new information from the recent statements. And to the people saying it's not new information, then why was it so widely reported as new information?
Posted on 12/31/24 at 9:40 am to cajuntiger1010
Yeah. To others points you may see a guy like mubenga or 1 of the true fr tackles depart knowing the 3 horses coming in. Especially when Kelly is talking about Thomas and curne ability to physically be ready now
Posted on 12/31/24 at 9:58 am to moock blackjack
quote:
Chester and Mubenga need to be religated to backups
Don't think its time to cancel a couple of redshirt freshmen. Mubenga improved quite a bit the last 2 games. Would like to see Chester at guard before we cancel him out.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 10:36 am to Codythetiger
quote:
Sounds like we missed on the last couples of years O-line hauls.
If lsu missed on the last couple OL hauls then no one in the country hit. The OL has been recruited very well and you guys are just a bunch of chicken littles that read into everything way too damn much.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 11:59 am to TigerGrad03
Don’t know if it makes a difference but Kimo would probably switch back to O-line.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 12:11 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
And also, go frick yourself into oblivion. You're just another in a long line of people who either refuse to read or can't understand what I've actually said in this thread.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 12:29 pm to Pollo10
quote:
Don’t know if it makes a difference but Kimo would probably switch back to O-line.
He'll probably hit the portal, not sure why he hasnt already
Posted on 12/31/24 at 1:41 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
I'm fricking done
Posted on 12/31/24 at 1:43 pm to ProjectP2294
We are so inexperienced that it seems like a good move to bring another in. Maybe the young guys come thru, maybe not. They are unproven at this level. I see it as a good move even if they feel good about the guys we already have.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 1:58 pm to ProjectP2294
Maybe there should have been a point where you just decided to sit this one out.
If not, perhaps you should reconsider.
If not, perhaps you should reconsider.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 2:22 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
If he's making that comment after 15 bowl practices, they don't feel good about the development of some of the young guys on the roster.
I’d say it’s probably exactly where they were exiting the regular season.
I thought we needed 3 starters.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 2:35 pm to BillF
quote:
Maybe there should have been a point where you just decided to sit this one out. If not, perhaps you should reconsider.
Consider fricking yourself
Posted on 12/31/24 at 3:36 pm to tgdk11
Damone Clark wasn’t a full time starter for a few years but he wasn’t awful. Bad take. Rotational players aren’t necessarily bad players.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 3:40 pm to NFLU7
quote:
Damone Clark wasn’t a full time starter for a few years but he wasn’t awful. Bad take.
Damone was bad until Blake Baker coached him.
Cushenberry was never bad though.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 3:47 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
He was probably looking for very specific things during the bowl practices, and when he didn't see what he wanted out of some guys, in regards to how they can contribute next year specifically, he said we need to get more help there.
Again……that’s not how any of this works.
Posted on 12/31/24 at 9:30 pm to vidtiger23
I thought ok was the least of our problem tonight
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News