- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/28/12 at 6:35 pm to LewDawg
as long as it has the same internet browser that is currently on the ps3 all will be good.
Posted on 3/28/12 at 6:38 pm to MaroonDawg
Posted on 3/28/12 at 7:28 pm to stout
frickkkkk that shite.
Posted on 3/28/12 at 7:34 pm to stout
If used games are going to be locked out, they will have to sell new games at a lower cost. $65 will not cut it. There will have to be a middle ground.
Posted on 3/28/12 at 9:01 pm to Scruffy
(no message)
Posted on 3/28/12 at 11:15 pm to MintBerry Crunch
What happens to those guys that bring their PS4 tailgating? No Internet, no games?
Posted on 3/28/12 at 11:34 pm to stout
this is just plain dumb
Posted on 3/29/12 at 12:31 am to Eyothrie
quote:
If used games are going to be locked out, they will have to sell new games at a lower cost. $65 will not cut it. There will have to be a middle ground.
This.
The games will have to be cheaper since we wont get an in-hand copy (even though I don't think they will be). I wont be paying $60 (I RARELY buy games new, unless I do trade-ins) for a game that I cant play with my anywhere I want.
The prices to the games might even go higher than $60. Whenever the 360/ps3 came out the game prices went from $49.99 to $59.99, so it's not crazy to think that the prices will go up even higher.
This post was edited on 3/29/12 at 12:32 am
Posted on 3/29/12 at 7:04 am to bluebarracuda
I need to find a new hobby. This is just getting too expensive. I mean - only one account can play a game? What a crock of shite.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 7:29 am to Jcorye1
quote:
Meh, the movie industry has been popping out with shite for a long time now, and it really hasn't hurt them too much.
Movie industry's investment is a lot less though.
9 dollars or so and a few hours of your time.
70 dollars is a hell of a lot steeper than that.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 8:56 am to Chimlim
quote:
only one account can play a game? What a crock of shite.
how is this going to work with families that have more than one account on a console? you are now going to have to buy a copy of the game for each kid?
Posted on 3/29/12 at 11:01 am to Eyothrie
quote:
If used games are going to be locked out, they will have to sell new games at a lower cost. $65 will not cut it.
You think NexGen games are only going to cost 65$? 
Posted on 3/29/12 at 11:10 am to TK421
Remember when the original Warcraft was $70 back in the day? Peaks and valleys people.....peaks and valleys.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 11:20 am to stout
You telling me all the brilliant businessman sat down at a table and said how can we frick over our great customers and piss them off tremendously.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 11:42 am to TK421
quote:
You think NexGen games are only going to cost 65$?
I remember paying $70 for Final Fantasy 1 on the NES back in 1990. The cost of games from generation to generation for the most part remains constant
This post was edited on 3/29/12 at 11:43 am
Posted on 3/29/12 at 11:49 am to Eyothrie
quote:
. The cost of games from generation to generation for the most part remains constant
PS1 - 40$
PS2 - 50$
PS3 - 60$
I would expect PS4 games to be 70-75.
Posted on 3/29/12 at 11:55 am to TK421
I can maneuver around a lot of the proposed changes for the next gen systems, but the lack of a secondary market (used games) to drive prices down sucks major balls. With the cost of production being what it is for AAA games, I don't suspect any price cuts. I'm thinking the price only goes higher.
I'm also not a fan of tying a game to one specific account. Games on Demand on xbla works that way and I hate having people use my account. I'd rather them set up their own account and play the game. Less opportunity for anybody to frick up my settings/saves.
I don't think that it will spell another gaming crash, but I suspect that there will be some fallout if all this shite gets implemented.
I'm also not a fan of tying a game to one specific account. Games on Demand on xbla works that way and I hate having people use my account. I'd rather them set up their own account and play the game. Less opportunity for anybody to frick up my settings/saves.
I don't think that it will spell another gaming crash, but I suspect that there will be some fallout if all this shite gets implemented.
This post was edited on 3/29/12 at 11:56 am
Posted on 3/29/12 at 11:56 am to TK421
quote:
I would expect PS4 games to be 70-75.
Not if the used game market is out of the equation which was my point. Publishers and developers wouldn't be losing $$ to the second hand market anymore, so they could afford to sell their games at a lower cost. Whether or not they actually do this, who really knows. But it would be in their best interest to do so. 70-75 is more than the average consumer would be willing to spend, and they know this. They would lose sales.
This post was edited on 3/29/12 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 3/29/12 at 11:57 am to CornDogCologne
quote:
Less opportunity for anybody to frick up my settings/saves.
How about you stop being so selfish George
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News