Started By
Message

re: Scientists created the world's whitest paint could eliminate the need for A/C

Posted on 9/20/21 at 7:54 am to
Posted by blueboxer1119
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
8088 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 7:54 am to
Yeah, sign me up to breathe this shite in all day.

Ill put that on my to do list.

Right behind getting vaccinated.
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19378 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 7:56 am to
Of course it’s white paint. Would expect nothing less from racist science

Unless it’s climate science. That is set in stone and unimpeachable
Posted by CaptN
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2013
378 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 7:56 am to
Not a physicist, but I have stayed at a Holiday Inn. Isn't this one step away from a perpetual motion machine?
Posted by LazloHollyfeld
Steam Tunnel at UNC-G
Member since Apr 2009
1619 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 7:57 am to
Wouldn’t this just reflect more heat back into the the atmosphere and increase “global warming”? Same problem caused by concrete heat islands in cities.
Posted by LSU$$$
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2013
1165 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:04 am to
quote:

The whitest paint in the world has been created in a lab at Purdue University




checks out...
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27223 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:17 am to
How is it going to work when the entire roof is covered with solar panels?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67546 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Scientists created the world's whitest paint

They named it Larry Bird white
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85311 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:21 am to
And when all the roofs are painted white and that radiation gets reflected back into the sky, then what???
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51958 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:31 am to

quote:

They do already make radiant paints. I know of one you can buy for about $300 for 5 gallons that is called Lo/Mit-II and use it on the backside of your rafters and decking in your attic. It is a radiant barrier paint but it is less effective than the roll foil radiant barrier. When the paint is installed correctly, it will reflect about 75% of the radiant heat vs actual radiant barrier blocking 97% of radiant heat but neither of those claims to actively make an area cooler than surrounding temperatures like the paint in the article does.


Well no. Because it will just radiate inside the house.

What they are saying they gave a paint you would put on OUTSIDE and would reflect most of the solar energy and emit more thermal radiation than it absorbs, causing a cooling effect.

Obviously won’t do anything about humidity though.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
11098 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:34 am to
That’s racist…
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11883 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:34 am to
Wishful thinking. Could help cool but not eliminate need for A/C

10kw = 34,122 BTU/hr

Not quite a 3 ton unit (12,000 btu per ton)

Also you need to cool air to dew point in order to remove moisture. Any humid climate will need an A/C system just for de-humidification. Especially a system to requires outside air.

Next, once the pint gets dirty it will quickly lose its reflective power.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
66288 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:37 am to
quote:

The paint has now made it into the Guinness World Records book as the whitest ever made.
This is what it would look like if paint could dance:

Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68752 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:40 am to
quote:

or even eliminate the need for air conditioning, scientists say
bullshite.
quote:

Using this new paint to cover a roof area of about 1,000 square feet could result in a cooling power of 10 kilowatts. “That’s more powerful than the air conditioners used by most houses,” Ruan said.
bullshite.
quote:

The paint reflects 98.1% of solar radiation while also emitting infrared heat
What are the unintended consequences of this?
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 8:41 am to
quote:

could eliminate the need for A/C


Quite possibly the dumbest statement ever.

Please think about it
Posted by DLauw
SWLA
Member since Sep 2011
6087 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Barium sulphate



from the guiness link:
quote:

Seeking to highlight the potential benefits of radiative cooling, Professor Xiulin Ruan (who was part of the study) said: “If you were to use this paint to cover a roof area of about 1,000 square feet [93 m2], we estimate that you could get a cooling power up to 10 kilowatts. That’s more powerful than the air conditioners used by most houses.” Scaling that up, the scientists estimate that it would only require 0.5–1% of Earth’s surface to be coated in this paint (e.g., by painting roofs) to reverse global warming to date.



Oil-based paint (oh, the irony). From the ACS website:
quote:

The BaSO4-acrylic paint is developed with a 60% volume concentration to enhance the reliability in outdoor applications, achieving a solar reflectance of 98.1% and a sky window emissivity of 0.95.
Posted by Bamafig
Member since Nov 2018
3213 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 9:59 am to
To be fair, the article is not specific to our region. There are marginal areas of the US and the world where this could eliminate A/C if the claims are true.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
17771 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 10:00 am to
Where does the heat go when it is reflected? I know it doesn't go back to the sun. Does it stay in the atmosphere?
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
6484 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 10:03 am to
Racist bastards couldnt make a colored magic paint?
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9762 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 10:06 am to
quote:

neither of those claims to actively make an area cooler than surrounding temperatures like the paint in the article does

It’s an interesting claim. At first I was going to say that I think it would probably be more accurate to state that a surface coated with the paint “heats up less than the surrounding area” when exposed to sunlight. Using the term “cooled” seems a bit misleading because it implies active removal of heat from the surface.

But then I re-read this piece:
quote:

The paint reflects 98.1% of solar radiation while also emitting infrared heat. Because the paint absorbs less heat from the sun than it emits, a surface coated with this paint is cooled below the surrounding temperature without consuming power.

So basically they are saying that the infrared emissions from the coating more than offset the 1.9% of solar radiation that still gets absorbed. If that is indeed the case, then the end result would be active cooling of the surface.

That being said, I’m skeptical that this can lead to active cooling inside a building. As the surface cools, it’s going to develop a temperature gradient with its surroundings and consequently absorb more heat via convention and conduction. The question becomes how much heat actually gets absorbed from the inside of the building. The air on top of the painted surface is going to be much hotter because A) it’s (presumably) hot outside and B) the air is being heated by sunlight from both directions - the direct heat from the sun and the reflected heat from the paint. It seems to me like most of that cooling would be wasted on the ambient air.

So it’s not good enough to just paint the roof. You would also need to design the building to both minimize convective heat transfer from the roof to the atmosphere and also maximize heat transfer from the interior to the roof. In hot climates, this would be the exact opposite of traditional designs.

ETA: All of that said, it would almost certainly result in an overall energy efficiency improvement, just by absorbing less overall heat from the surroundings than the alternative.
This post was edited on 9/20/21 at 10:08 am
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 9/20/21 at 10:09 am to
quote:

stout


Side question


quote:

but it is less effective than the roll foil radiant barrier
how well does this stuff work?

My attic is easily assessable and I’m able to stand in it easily. I don’t think it would be hard for me to install some.

My upstairs is always 7-8° hotter than downstairs.

I’ve thought about installing a fan up there since I’ve already got a circuit wired.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram