re: Mathematician- election numbers could not have occurred naturally

quote:

---

Personally, I trust science. Last I checked, mathematics is science

---

quote:

---

They know they're full of shite We know they're full of shite They know WE know they're full of shite ... and they're daring you to do something meaningful about it.

---

quote:

---

Elections expert: Challengers didn't understand the process

In several lawsuits, the Trump campaign and allies provided more than 100 affidavits to support their allegations of election fraud and abuse in Michigan. In at least two cases, the city of Detroit responded with an affidavit from Christopher Thomas, an elections expert and a former head of elections for Michigan.

Thomas painstakingly addressed the allegations in one suit, concluding Republican challengers “do not understand absent voter ballot processing and tabulating.”

Michigan judge Timothy Kenny
Perhaps if Plaintiffs' election challenger affiants had attended the October 29, 2020 walk-through of the TCF Center ballot counting location, questions and concerns could have been answered in advance of Election Day.
The judge agreed, writing, “Perhaps if Plaintiffs' election challenger affiants had attended the October 29, 2020 walk-through of the TCF Center ballot counting location, questions and concerns could have been answered in advance of Election Day.

“Regrettably, they did not,” the judge wrote. “Plaintiffs' interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible.”

---

quote:

---

First, I’d like to stress that Benford’s Law can NOT be used to “prove fraud”,” he told Reuters by email. “It is only a Red Flag test, that can raise doubts. E.g., the IRS has been using it for decades to ferret out fraudsters, but only by identifying suspicious entries, at which time they put the auditors to work on the hard evidence. Whether or not a dataset follows BL proves nothing.”

---

quote:

---

You don’t have to work so hard to convince people you’re a Nazi. We already know you are.

---

quote:

---

Yea. It's a one in a quadrillion shot. But ONLY IF you assume that the votes after 2:00 a.m. on 11/4 (the mail in vote) came in at roughly the same R/D ratio as the votes before 2:00 a.m. ( the in-person vote) did that day.

---

quote:

---

Ok. You’re right. It was only a one in a billion

---

quote:

---

At 3:10AM EST on November 4 the Georgia reported tabulations were 51.09% for Trump and 48.91% for Biden (eliminating third-party candidates). The total votes reported for the two major candidates were 4,662,328.

On November 18 at 2 PM EST, the reported percentages were Trump 49.86% and Biden at 50.14%. The Biden advantage over Trump in the final tabulations reported was less than 14,000 votes, or 0.28%.

For this turnaround to occur, the subsequent additional "late" ballots totaling 268,204 votes (5.4% of the votes reported on November 18) had to split 71.60% for Biden and 28.40% for Trump.

---