Mathematician- election numbers could not have occurred naturally

quote:

---

They know they're full of shite
We know they're full of shite
They know WE know they're full of shite

... and they're daring you to do something meaningful about it.

Next?

---

Hence, troops stationed in DC.

I don't need math.

Ain't no way Biden won. No way.

They are trying to impeach trump because they know they can only suppress the facts of the fraud for so long.

It took 4 years for the truth about the Russia hoax to come out. It will take just as long for the truth of the election fraud to come out and they don’t want trump being able to run again when it does.

One in a quadrillion shot

Here's what I want to know. Why were we not aware of all of this frickery with the machines till after the election? Trump's team should have known these machines were bunk to begin with, and been leading a unified front to put a stop to them 3 or 4 years ago.

No shite...this could change everything.

So why are they writing this up in an academic journal? I mean I hope this is true but it has to be shown to the public at large.

quote:

---

Here's what I want to know. Why were we not aware of all of this frickery with the machines till after the election? Trump's team should have known these machines were bunk to begin with, and been leading a unified front to put a stop to them 3 or 4 years ago.

---

I think you answered your own question.

quote:

---

Here's what I want to know. Why were we not aware of all of this frickery with the machines till after the election? Trump's team should have known these machines were bunk to begin with, and been leading a unified front to put a stop to them 3 or 4 years ago.

---

Sadly, the number of people who occupy the Swamp that cared about a fair and legitimate election was probably less than a dozen people.....that’s not enough to stop the election shenanigans.

DEBUNKED

Reuters sought comment from experts regarding these claims.

quote:

---

Theodore P. Hill, Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at Georgia Tech, Atlanta, cautioned that regardless of the distribution uncovered, the application of Benford’s Law would not provide definitive evidence that fraud took place.

“First, I’d like to stress that Benford’s Law can NOT be used to “prove fraud”,” he told Reuters by email. “It is only a Red Flag test, that can raise doubts. E.g., the IRS has been using it for decades to ferret out fraudsters, but only by identifying suspicious entries, at which time they put the auditors to work on the hard evidence. Whether or not a dataset follows BL proves nothing.”

Walter Mebane, Professor at the Department of Political Science and Department of Statistics at the University of Michigan (here) authored a December 2006 article (here) around the application of Benford’s Law to the US presidential election results.

On Nov. 9, 2020, in response to “several queries” Mebane published a paper called “Inappropriate Applications of Benford’s Law Regularities to Some Data from the 2020 Presidential Election in the United States” (here). His paper says, “The displays shown at those sources using the first digits of precinct vote counts data from Fulton County, GA, Allegheny County, PA, Milwaukee, WI, and Chicago, IL, say nothing about possible frauds” before examining the reasons behind this statement.

“It is widely understood that the first digits of precinct vote counts are not useful for trying to diagnose election frauds,” he writes.

---

Reuters