Started By
Message

re: Mathematician- election numbers could not have occurred naturally

Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14236 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

You have proven yourself MANY times over to be an idiot shill and therefore there is no debating idiots. You lose because you are a simpleton.

So if I've proved it many times it should be easy for you to post an example of what I posted was wrong and then prove why it was wrong.

or you can just post nothing and prove that you are just a big mouth blow hard.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52933 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

texridder



quote:

Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:38 am to texridder


Are you arguing over a 3 month old response???

Give it a rest. Life exists outside the internet....NERD!
This post was edited on 4/7/21 at 12:41 pm
Posted by AURaptor
South
Member since Aug 2018
11958 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:47 pm to
“ conservative “ Erick Erickson , WSBs replacement for the late Rush Limbaugh, said today that it was a kooky conspiracy theory that the election was stolen.



Only follow the science that the establishment want you to follow.
Posted by RazorBroncs
Harding Bisons Fan
Member since Sep 2013
13557 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:49 pm to

Texrider lives to argue on this board, so much so that she will bump a thread to argue against a 3 month old post

I challenge anyone to find me a post where texrider agrees with anything someone else has posted, anything at all.

She literally solely comes here to argue. Must be a miserable life.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14236 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Texrider lives to argue on this board, so much so that she will bump a thread to argue against a 3 month old post

The old post I responded to was relevant to the new post about the impossibility of the election results that is being spread around by Mike Lidell.

I don't come here to argue. I come here to point out the stupid crap that gets posted on here and spread around like manure every day.
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
7565 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I don't come here to argue.


Go back to DU you leftist clown. You'll get more satisfaction in that type of echo chamber.

Your side cheated and won.

Since you have no moral compass I'm sure that is AOK with you.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68970 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Walter Mebane, Professor at the Department of Political Science and Department of Statistics at the University of Michigan (here) authored a December 2006 article (here) around the application of Benford’s Law to the US presidential election results.



But in that article he says its used to detect fraud.

quote:

Note that our results are by no means direct proof of electoral fraud-they signal that the election data is compatible with the widespread occurrence of such types of fraud and that the data does not allow us to rule out ballot stuffing and voter rigging



Boom
This post was edited on 4/7/21 at 1:37 pm
Posted by Rex Feral
Athens
Member since Jan 2014
11446 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

texridder


Your ability to not let things go is very impressive. Have an upvote.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68970 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:46 pm to
Your fricking fact checking shite is full of shite. for example...

quote:

"In Philadelphia, observers have been kept far away — so far that people are using binoculars to try and see — and there's been tremendous problems caused. They put paper on all of the windows so you can't see in."

Rating: Somewhat true

The Philadelphia Inquirer did photograph an unidentified poll watcher using binoculars while workers can be seen in the background counting ballots inside the Pennsylvania Convention Center. But it's unclear how far away the observer was from the vote-counters, and the photo is dated November 3, Election Day.

Two days later, on Thursday, a state court judge ordered that poll watchers must be allowed within 6 feet of all ballot canvassing.

In terms of the papered windows of the Convention Center, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported there are windows with paper over them, but it's unclear whether those windows overlook the area where ballots are being tallied.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49899 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Ain't no way Biden won. No mutha fricking way.


FIFY
Posted by CaTiger85
Member since Feb 2020
1394 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

That's what Cicchetti assumed in his ridiculous calculation.


Yikes. Didn’t know that. Guess it’s just a one in a billion shot now. Good argument.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

For this turnaround to occur, the subsequent additional "late" ballots totaling 268,204 votes (5.4% of the votes reported on November 18) had to split 71.60% for Biden and 28.40% for Trump.


So, you think the odds of Biden getting 71.60% of the mail-in votes from Democratic voters -- predominantly from the Greater Atlanta area -- was one in a billion.

This must be your first rodeo.




this idea that 71% proves cheating is such nonsense.

before the election polls were out showing vast majority of Dems were voting by mail.

this thread is an example of reaching for straws.
it cant save you from the reality that trump lost.

Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14236 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Go back to DU you leftist clown. You'll get more satisfaction in that type of echo chamber.
No way. There are a lot more idiots on here
quote:

Your side cheated and won. Since you have no moral compass I'm sure that is AOK with you.
It is both humorous and pathetic the jackals Trumpists rely on for their "theories" about voter fraud.

Even a Trumper on here complained that all of the big accounting firms have statitical analysis and election forensic departments, yet the Trump side shows up with unqualified, unknown buffoons.

Why is that?
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19763 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Arizona Citizens Investigation Discovers Thousands of Phantom Voters in State – Up to 30% of Addresses in Investigation Were Fraudulent


LINK





Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Even a Trumper on here complained that all of the big accounting firms have statitical analysis and election forensic departments, yet the Trump side shows up with unqualified, unknown buffoons.

Why is that?


That person was me, and I have yet to get a answer, just more "statistical analyisis" from pusedo experts working on their kitchen table.
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
16456 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 4:15 pm to
I don’t even think the theft of the election is a question at this point. The only question is what can we possibly do about it?
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14236 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Arizona Citizens Investigation Discovers Thousands of Phantom Voters in State – Up to 30% of Addresses in Investigation Were Fraudulent

What is it that makes you incapable of realizing that this type of investigating is worthless.

The people making the investigation have to be impartial and there has to be stringent control over the methodology- neither of which was present in AZ.

Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 9:11 pm to
It’s enough, along with other corroborated affidavits, etc. to warrant a real, forensic investigation. If there was nothing to hide this wouldn’t be an issue and regressives wouldn’t be working around the clock and spending millions to stop it.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14236 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

You don’t have to work so hard to convince people you’re a Nazi. We already know you are.

Hey ignoramus. Why don't you point to the post that you are referring to and explain just how it demonstrates I am a Nazi.

Of course you are too much of a chickenshit to even attempt to do that.

It must suck to be you.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14236 posts
Posted on 4/7/21 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

It’s enough, along with other corroborated affidavits, etc. to warrant a real, forensic investigation. If there was nothing to hide this wouldn’t be an issue and regressives wouldn’t be working around the clock and spending millions to stop it.

The Republican Maricopa Board of Commissioners already paid for two qualified, independent firms to do an audit on the election.

And no, they do not want Karen Fann, the president of the Republican Senate, to appoint a cast of partisan clowns to do another audit, even after Fann promised that she would appoint a qualified, non-partisan group to do the Senate audit.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram