- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mathematician- election numbers could not have occurred naturally
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:30 pm to Speckhunter2012
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:30 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
You have proven yourself MANY times over to be an idiot shill and therefore there is no debating idiots. You lose because you are a simpleton.
So if I've proved it many times it should be easy for you to post an example of what I posted was wrong and then prove why it was wrong.
or you can just post nothing and prove that you are just a big mouth blow hard.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:39 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
quote:
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:38 am to texridder
Are you arguing over a 3 month old response???
Give it a rest. Life exists outside the internet....NERD!
This post was edited on 4/7/21 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:47 pm to prplngldtigr
“ conservative “ Erick Erickson , WSBs replacement for the late Rush Limbaugh, said today that it was a kooky conspiracy theory that the election was stolen.
Only follow the science that the establishment want you to follow.
Only follow the science that the establishment want you to follow.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:49 pm to BugAC
Texrider lives to argue on this board, so much so that she will bump a thread to argue against a 3 month old post
I challenge anyone to find me a post where texrider agrees with anything someone else has posted, anything at all.
She literally solely comes here to argue. Must be a miserable life.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:10 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
Texrider lives to argue on this board, so much so that she will bump a thread to argue against a 3 month old post
The old post I responded to was relevant to the new post about the impossibility of the election results that is being spread around by Mike Lidell.
I don't come here to argue. I come here to point out the stupid crap that gets posted on here and spread around like manure every day.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:25 pm to texridder
quote:
I don't come here to argue.
Go back to DU you leftist clown. You'll get more satisfaction in that type of echo chamber.
Your side cheated and won.
Since you have no moral compass I'm sure that is AOK with you.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:36 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Walter Mebane, Professor at the Department of Political Science and Department of Statistics at the University of Michigan (here) authored a December 2006 article (here) around the application of Benford’s Law to the US presidential election results.
But in that article he says its used to detect fraud.
quote:
Note that our results are by no means direct proof of electoral fraud-they signal that the election data is compatible with the widespread occurrence of such types of fraud and that the data does not allow us to rule out ballot stuffing and voter rigging
Boom
This post was edited on 4/7/21 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:40 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
Your ability to not let things go is very impressive. Have an upvote.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:46 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
Your fricking fact checking shite is full of shite. for example...
quote:
"In Philadelphia, observers have been kept far away — so far that people are using binoculars to try and see — and there's been tremendous problems caused. They put paper on all of the windows so you can't see in."
Rating: Somewhat true
The Philadelphia Inquirer did photograph an unidentified poll watcher using binoculars while workers can be seen in the background counting ballots inside the Pennsylvania Convention Center. But it's unclear how far away the observer was from the vote-counters, and the photo is dated November 3, Election Day.
Two days later, on Thursday, a state court judge ordered that poll watchers must be allowed within 6 feet of all ballot canvassing.
In terms of the papered windows of the Convention Center, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported there are windows with paper over them, but it's unclear whether those windows overlook the area where ballots are being tallied.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:51 pm to Langland
quote:
Ain't no way Biden won. No mutha fricking way.
FIFY
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:04 pm to texridder
quote:
That's what Cicchetti assumed in his ridiculous calculation.
Yikes. Didn’t know that. Guess it’s just a one in a billion shot now. Good argument.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 2:17 pm to texridder
quote:
For this turnaround to occur, the subsequent additional "late" ballots totaling 268,204 votes (5.4% of the votes reported on November 18) had to split 71.60% for Biden and 28.40% for Trump.
So, you think the odds of Biden getting 71.60% of the mail-in votes from Democratic voters -- predominantly from the Greater Atlanta area -- was one in a billion.
This must be your first rodeo.
this idea that 71% proves cheating is such nonsense.
before the election polls were out showing vast majority of Dems were voting by mail.
this thread is an example of reaching for straws.
it cant save you from the reality that trump lost.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 3:03 pm to AndyCBR
quote:No way. There are a lot more idiots on here
Go back to DU you leftist clown. You'll get more satisfaction in that type of echo chamber.
quote:It is both humorous and pathetic the jackals Trumpists rely on for their "theories" about voter fraud.
Your side cheated and won. Since you have no moral compass I'm sure that is AOK with you.
Even a Trumper on here complained that all of the big accounting firms have statitical analysis and election forensic departments, yet the Trump side shows up with unqualified, unknown buffoons.
Why is that?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 4:11 pm to texridder
quote:
Even a Trumper on here complained that all of the big accounting firms have statitical analysis and election forensic departments, yet the Trump side shows up with unqualified, unknown buffoons.
Why is that?
That person was me, and I have yet to get a answer, just more "statistical analyisis" from pusedo experts working on their kitchen table.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 4:15 pm to prplngldtigr
I don’t even think the theft of the election is a question at this point. The only question is what can we possibly do about it?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 8:59 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
Arizona Citizens Investigation Discovers Thousands of Phantom Voters in State – Up to 30% of Addresses in Investigation Were Fraudulent
What is it that makes you incapable of realizing that this type of investigating is worthless.
The people making the investigation have to be impartial and there has to be stringent control over the methodology- neither of which was present in AZ.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 9:11 pm to texridder
It’s enough, along with other corroborated affidavits, etc. to warrant a real, forensic investigation. If there was nothing to hide this wouldn’t be an issue and regressives wouldn’t be working around the clock and spending millions to stop it.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 9:15 pm to Madking
quote:
You don’t have to work so hard to convince people you’re a Nazi. We already know you are.
Hey ignoramus. Why don't you point to the post that you are referring to and explain just how it demonstrates I am a Nazi.
Of course you are too much of a chickenshit to even attempt to do that.
It must suck to be you.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 9:41 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
It’s enough, along with other corroborated affidavits, etc. to warrant a real, forensic investigation. If there was nothing to hide this wouldn’t be an issue and regressives wouldn’t be working around the clock and spending millions to stop it.
The Republican Maricopa Board of Commissioners already paid for two qualified, independent firms to do an audit on the election.
And no, they do not want Karen Fann, the president of the Republican Senate, to appoint a cast of partisan clowns to do another audit, even after Fann promised that she would appoint a qualified, non-partisan group to do the Senate audit.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News