- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mathematician- election numbers could not have occurred naturally
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:02 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:02 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
What this mathematician alleges has nothing to do with Benfords law dumbass.
Did you watch the video?
I don't know who the guy making the claim is or if his claim is true.
I can tell you it has nothing to do with Benfords law because I watched it.
Did you watch the video?
I don't know who the guy making the claim is or if his claim is true.
I can tell you it has nothing to do with Benfords law because I watched it.
0
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:12 pm to prplngldtigr
Solomon was the same guy who came out with this same type of report on the voting in Philadelphia saying that the Dominion voting machines were using ratios to increase the Biden vote while taking votes away from Trump.
After Solomon announced his findings on the ratios used in the Philadelphia vote, it then came out that Philadelphia did not use Dominion machines. He didn't even know they weren't using the "vote switching" Dominion machines.
He's a fraud.
After Solomon announced his findings on the ratios used in the Philadelphia vote, it then came out that Philadelphia did not use Dominion machines. He didn't even know they weren't using the "vote switching" Dominion machines.
He's a fraud.
This post was edited on 1/28/21 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:15 pm to texridder
Well, what machines were they using? If he observed the same kind of impossible behavior on a different set of voting machines, that doesn’t disprove the possibility of fraud. If anything, it points to a wider fraud.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:30 pm to texridder
LINK
.gov Link.
ES&S, Dominion, Smartmatic...... Does it really matter if it was Dominion or some other "electronic" voting machine that may or may not have internet access during and or after the election? Or, as we saw in Georgia and on Camera, thumb drives inserted to manipulate the votes?
Can you mathematically REFUTE the formula he used? I think not. Let's see what you got Einstein. Please solve this enigma of Biden receiving Hundreds of Thousands of votes AFTER the Polls "closed".
Do you understand that those in power can access YOUR computer anytime they want?
Now can you comprehend that "electronic" voting is wide open to manipulation and fraud?
If not, continue grazing with the sheep in the field of Ignorance is Bliss.
.gov Link.
ES&S, Dominion, Smartmatic...... Does it really matter if it was Dominion or some other "electronic" voting machine that may or may not have internet access during and or after the election? Or, as we saw in Georgia and on Camera, thumb drives inserted to manipulate the votes?
Can you mathematically REFUTE the formula he used? I think not. Let's see what you got Einstein. Please solve this enigma of Biden receiving Hundreds of Thousands of votes AFTER the Polls "closed".
Do you understand that those in power can access YOUR computer anytime they want?
Now can you comprehend that "electronic" voting is wide open to manipulation and fraud?
If not, continue grazing with the sheep in the field of Ignorance is Bliss.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:36 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
First, I’d like to stress that Benford’s Law can NOT be used to “prove fraud”
This video had nothing to do with Benford's law - is this a response to the video in the OP or is it an old response to claims of Benford's law application from months ago.
quote:???
Reuters sought comment from experts regarding these claims.
Benford's law is not as rigorous when applied to small numbers of potential voters, such as when there are many precincts with fewer than 500 votes in them. It is meant to analyze group patterns for much larger sample size. But even then, it has some applicability.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:37 pm to prplngldtigr
I never thought that I'd live long enough to see the vaunted United States of America lose its tradition of free and fair elections, but, I did.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:39 pm to burger bearcat
Trump - the FBI wire tapped my office.
Media - LOL, tinfoil hat conspiracy nut.
( FBI in fact did wire tap Trump Tower.)
Trump - they are going to steal the election media - LOL tin foil hat conspiracy nut.
( election was indeed stolen )
Media - LOL, tinfoil hat conspiracy nut.
( FBI in fact did wire tap Trump Tower.)
Trump - they are going to steal the election media - LOL tin foil hat conspiracy nut.
( election was indeed stolen )
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:48 pm to texridder
quote:
After Solomon announced his findings on the ratios used in the Philadelphia vote, it then came out that Philadelphia did not use Dominion machines. He didn't even know they weren't using the "vote switching" Dominion machines. He's a fraud.
Don’t waste your time, these people cannot even understand the basic arithmetic of how Biden can get 81 million votes, and still win less counties than Hillary or Obama.
Posted on 1/28/21 at 11:48 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:Yeah, those Chinese guys were manipulating the votes. And the Germans were manipulating the votes from the Dominion servers they had over there.
Do you understand that those in power can access YOUR computer anytime they want?
quote:What in the fuk are you talking about? What votes after the polls closed? You mean the mail in votes that weren't counted until the polls closed?
Please solve this enigma of Biden receiving Hundreds of Thousands of votes AFTER the Polls "closed".
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:17 am to texridder
quote:
Yea. It's a one in a quadrillion shot. But ONLY IF you assume that the votes after 2:00 a.m. on 11/4 (the mail in vote) came in at roughly the same R/D ratio as the votes before 2:00 a.m. ( the in-person vote) did that day.
Ok. You’re right. It was only a one ina billion
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:18 am to texridder
quote:
Yeah, those Chinese guys were manipulating the votes. And the Germans were manipulating the votes from the Dominion servers they had over there.
Muh Russia.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:22 am to texridder
quote:
Solomon was the same guy who came out with this same type of report on the voting in Philadelphia saying that the Dominion voting machines were using ratios to increase the Biden vote while taking votes away from Trump.
After Solomon announced his findings on the ratios used in the Philadelphia vote, it then came out that Philadelphia did not use Dominion machines. He didn't even know they weren't using the "vote switching" Dominion machines.
He's a fraud.
quote:
Logan later tweeted that Edward Solomon, who is labeled as the video host, “misspoke” and “meant Pennsylvania,” not Philadelphia.
However, the video she shared shows a spreadsheet that clearly includes “Philadelphia” entries, making it unlikely that this began as a simple slip of the tongue.
Dominion software was used in 14 counties elsewhere in Pennsylvania in the 2020 election, producing a total of 1.3 million votes, the company says on its website. Of those, 676,000 votes, or 52%, went to President Donald Trump.
A spokeswoman for Fox Nation did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
___
This item has been updated to note that Dominion software was used in 14 other Pennsylvania counties in the 2020 election, with the majority of votes in those counties going to Trump.
AP
It's basically the same report by the same guy. And it's still not true.
More proof that OANN does not provide news, but rather views.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:34 am to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Please solve this enigma of Biden receiving Hundreds of Thousands of votes AFTER the Polls "closed".
DEBUNKED
quote:
Election workers didn’t ‘find’ Biden votes overnight. They counted and reported mail in ballots
Facebook posts are spreading a tweet that claims election workers, overnight, "found" 140,000 mail in ballots in Wisconsin, 200,000 in Michigan and 1 million in Pennsylvania, and all were for Biden.
This is inaccurate. The numbers are either wrong or exaggerated, and the post misinterprets the counting and reporting of legal mail in ballots as "found" votes.
Election workers didn’t ‘find’ Biden votes overnight. They counted and reported mail in ballots
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:38 am to texridder
quote:
What in the fuk are you talking about? What votes after the polls closed? You mean the mail in votes that weren't counted until the polls closed?
Like 100,000 mail in ballots for one candidate and maybe 2,000 for the other? Yeah, thanks for bringing that up. That was BS fraud too. Mathematically IMPOSSIBLE, even in NOLA, Philly, Chicago......name your place.
You have proven yourself MANY times over to be an idiot shill and therefore there is no debating idiots. You lose because you are a simpleton.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:42 am to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Like 100,000 mail in ballots for one candidate and maybe 2,000 for the other?
DEBUNKED
quote:
"And these batches were NOT 100% Biden votes," a FiveThirtyEight spokesperson. "Behind the blue line, there is also a red line representing thousands of votes Trump gained. There are also counter examples where Trump’s line shoots up suddenly when a favorable batch of results are reported."
No, these FiveThirtyEight graphs don’t prove voter fraud
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:45 am to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Mathematician- election numbers could not have occurred naturally
quote:
Please solve this enigma of Biden receiving Hundreds of Thousands of votes AFTER the Polls "closed".
DEBUNKED
quote:
Election workers didn’t ‘find’ Biden votes overnight. They counted and reported mail in ballots
Facebook posts are spreading a tweet that claims election workers, overnight, "found" 140,000 mail in ballots in Wisconsin, 200,000 in Michigan and 1 million in Pennsylvania, and all were for Biden.
This is inaccurate. The numbers are either wrong or exaggerated, and the post misinterprets the counting and reporting of legal mail in ballots as "found" votes.
This is misleading. I have seen several Republican poll workers from this that have sworn in affidavits that they were locked out of the "counting" of the mail in ballots.
Posted on 1/29/21 at 12:52 am to sabanisarustedspoke
quote:
Republican poll workers from this that have sworn in affidavits that they were locked out of the "counting" of the mail in ballots.
Jeebus how many times does that have to be debunked before it sinks in?
quote:
But the issue was the number of election challengers allowed in the TCF Center. State law allows one challenger per party to serve in a counting board, and when Democratic and Republican election challengers were stopped from entering the TCF Center, it was because the number of challengers exceeded the maximum allowed by law.
Lawrence Garcia, corporation counsel for the city of Detroit and a commissioner on the Detroit Election Commission, told CBS News on Wednesday the city was "not allowing more challengers in because we had gone over the 134 challenger limit for each party."
"The count on the book was 250 Democrat to 225 Republican, plus or minus one or two," he said.
Fact-checking Trump's claims on poll watchers
DEBUNKED
Posted on 1/29/21 at 1:04 am to prplngldtigr
That’s why I still don’t think of him as “President Biden”. They know he’s a fraudulent president and we know. There’s no respect for him
Posted on 1/29/21 at 1:14 am to prplngldtigr
WHERE IS THE GA LEGISLATURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
People in GA should snail mail, email, and call their state reps and demand they investigate their SOS and this election fraud. Who tampered with the USB drives?
People in GA should snail mail, email, and call their state reps and demand they investigate their SOS and this election fraud. Who tampered with the USB drives?
Posted on 1/29/21 at 1:19 am to obdobd918
quote:
Who tampered with the USB drives?
DEBUNKED
quote:
Fact check: Video does not show Dominion employee manipulating votes in Gwinnett County, Georgia
Social media users have been sharing posts which claim to show a video of an employee of the electronic voting company, Dominion Voting Systems, manipulating and stealing voting data. However, a spokesperson for the Gwinnett County government and the voting system implementation manager for Georgia have explained that the person in the video is a Dominion technician who was simply transferring a data report to another computer so he could read it and use the other computer to filter requested information.
A spokesperson for Dominion said that it is not physically possible for vote tabulators to use a USB stick to add votes for a candidate.
The Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council Executive Committee and the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council said in a statement that election security officials have no evidence that ballots were changed, deleted or lost by voting systems in the Nov. 3 U.S. election, which they described as “the most secure in American history.” (here)
Republican President Donald Trump has repeatedly made unsubstantiated claims of electoral fraud (here).
Reuters has debunked many other claims related to Dominion (here , here , here) and voter fraud (here , here).
A spokesperson for the Gwinnett County Government and the voting system implementation manager for Georgia said the man shown in the video is a Dominion technician using the USB to transfer a data report to another computer where he was able to filter requested information. A spokesperson for Dominion said that it is not physically possible for vote tabulators to use a USB stick to add votes for a candidate.
This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team.
Reuters
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News