- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Can we all agree nothing in that memo "threatened national security"?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:39 pm
or threatened the methods of our federal LEO/intel communities?
hell, does anyone even want to make an argument that the names needed to be redacted?
also, if yo are saying this was "information we already knew" and/or a "nothing burger" then i hope you never used the "national security" argument
hell, does anyone even want to make an argument that the names needed to be redacted?
also, if yo are saying this was "information we already knew" and/or a "nothing burger" then i hope you never used the "national security" argument
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
But rex said it was trasonous.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
a want is still looking. Give him time.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
OMG YES IT DID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT'S ALSO ALL MADE UP AND NOT TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT'S ALSO ALL MADE UP AND NOT TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
Its the end of the world as we know it
And i feel fine
And i feel fine
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
Just posted that. There is nothing remotely close to threatening national security. Unless shining a light on massive corruption is now considered threatening
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:41 pm to beerJeep
quote:
rex
Wants badly to be a woman, dresses like a dog, and lives in a padded cell. Its opinion is severely invalid.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
a want, 8am: "I can't believe Trump didn't read this, it's a threat to our national security!''
a want 12pm: "OMG lol, you guys fell for this nothing burger. I knew it."
a want 12pm: "OMG lol, you guys fell for this nothing burger. I knew it."
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
I was literally shaking reading it. How can I explain this to my kids?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
There’s nothing in that memo that threatens national security in anyway. It was just another dem tactic to delay this coming out.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:The only "security" threatened is the governments security in being able to secretly spy on any American at any time.
Can we all agree nothing in that memo "threatened national security"?
It is apparently only a farce to obtain a FISA warrant.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
also, if yo are saying this was "information we already knew" and/or a "nothing burger" then i hope you never used the "national security" argument
I doubt consistency of talking points registers on a political hack's radar.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Actually no.
Obtaining a warrant with a fake document created by a foreign agent to spy on Americans and a Presidential candidate and his people is a threat to the Constitution.
A threat to the Constitution is a threat to national security!
This is TREASON!
Obtaining a warrant with a fake document created by a foreign agent to spy on Americans and a Presidential candidate and his people is a threat to the Constitution.
A threat to the Constitution is a threat to national security!
This is TREASON!
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
I saw the word "the" in there...we use that word in millions of classified docs...
Unconstitutional!
Unconstitutional!
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
It'll make it harder to obtain FISA warrants.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:43 pm to NIH
quote:
a want, 8am: "I can't believe Trump didn't read this, it's a threat to our national security!''
a want 12pm: "OMG lol, you guys fell for this nothing burger. I knew it."
Yeah, based on his present position, it wouldn't even be worthy of the president's time in reading.

Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
I didn't see anything....unless Michael Isikoff is a CIA asset.
But we don't know what might have been exposed.
Either way: the release of classified info in this sort of willy nilly fashion (like the president didn't even read it before making his decision) is terrible way of doing business.
But we don't know what might have been exposed.
Either way: the release of classified info in this sort of willy nilly fashion (like the president didn't even read it before making his decision) is terrible way of doing business.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Everyone with a fair, open mind knows this. Only those with an agenda claim it is detrimental to national security.
Popular
Back to top
