- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Roads are better, Cars are safer, Let's raise the speed limit.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:24 am
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:24 am
I've been saying for a while now that the majority of speed limits on our interstate system are artificially low. Take I-49 for example. I applaud the raise of the limit to 75 but it is still too low. There is no reason that the limit shouldn't be 85 there.
Take a minute and read this recent article from a UT Professor of Transportation Engineering. LINK
I'm fine with someone wanting to drive 65, just stay in the right lane. If I can safely travel at 75+ then I should't be penalized by law enforcement. I can't be the only one who thinks it's time re-evaluate limits right? Does the limit really affect how fast you drive?
Take a minute and read this recent article from a UT Professor of Transportation Engineering. LINK
quote:
Laws should not make people choose between what is legal and what is safe. Instead, let's put some trust in drivers. Although we all like to complain about other drivers on the road, the fact is that almost all of us get where we are going each day without an accident. Most of us are perfectly capable of finding a safe speed to drive at even without a speed limit sign.
quote:
Current best practices in transportation engineering — supported by extensive research by organizations such as the Federal Highway Administration, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program and the Institute of Transportation Engineers — is that speed limits should be set at the 85th percentile of traffic speed. That is, only about 1 out of 7 cars should be driving faster than the speed limit. Any more than that and the speed limit should be raised.
I'm fine with someone wanting to drive 65, just stay in the right lane. If I can safely travel at 75+ then I should't be penalized by law enforcement. I can't be the only one who thinks it's time re-evaluate limits right? Does the limit really affect how fast you drive?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:28 am to NewIberiaHaircut
WHY WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!???!?!?
What I really want to know is, why would you fix Staring lane, and then lower the speed limit. Whatever hack congressman did that deserves to be tarred and feathered.
What I really want to know is, why would you fix Staring lane, and then lower the speed limit. Whatever hack congressman did that deserves to be tarred and feathered.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:28 am to NewIberiaHaircut
quote:
Instead, let's put some trust in drivers
Hmmm. How about instead, let's make the licensing exam far more rigorous and make people people take it every so often if their driving history would indicate a need for it.
There are frickin millions of people driving on the roads now that have no business behind the wheel.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:29 am to NewIberiaHaircut
But what will our govt. do to make up for the loss of funds? The big dog needs to eat...
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:29 am to NewIberiaHaircut
no speed limits on the interstates in Montana
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:30 am to Salmon
I'd say roads & infrastructure in the US are pretty piss poor.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:30 am to Jcorye1
John Delgado is the man responsible for that
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:31 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
let's make the licensing exam far more rigorous and make people people take it every so often if their driving history would indicate a need for it.
racist
and
agist
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:31 am to Salmon
quote:
no speed limits on the interstates in Montana
they must save a ton of gas
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:31 am to NewIberiaHaircut
Roads are typically designed for 10mph above the posted speed limit. That would mean interstates with an 85mph speed limit have to be designed for 95mph. That's a stopping sight distance of a little over 1200' which is almost a quarter mile. Do you really want the person behind you to need a quarter mile to safely stop in case you need to slam on your brakes?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:32 am to NewIberiaHaircut
I don't want teenage girls zipping around at 85 in their Camrys, driving with their knee and fricking with the radio. I'll consider the occasional speeding ticket payment for that to not happen.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:33 am to NewIberiaHaircut
The government shouldn't regulate roads anyways.
Don't tread on me.
Don't tread on me.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:34 am to NewIberiaHaircut
quote:
Roads are better
true
quote:
Cars are safer
true
However, the stupidity/irresponsibility of the American driver is at an all time high.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:34 am to Ingeniero
I'm more worried about the 18 wheelers traveling at those elevated speeds. They can't keep themselves from flipping and burning up at 60 why would I think they'd be any better at 80?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:35 am to NewIberiaHaircut
As someone that drives 12 from Hammond to BR regularly, I will say in my experience the vast majority of traffic related issues are caused by 18 wheelers out of the right hand lane.
Case in point: I drove to Juban Crossing yesterday. Left Hammond and did not exceed 60 mph until I got to the bridge before Walker. There were two trucks camped out in the left lane trying to pass a truck in the right. After they finally cleared, all manner of people weaved in and out to shoot past these guys.
I can't tell you how many times I see 18 wheelers in the morning drive with 40 car lengths in front of them camped out in the left and middle lanes. You say "Well it takes these trucks longer to stop". Great. Do it in the right hand lane.
Restrict truck traffic to right lane only or have the cops enforce the left lane passing only rules. If it takes you 40 miles to pass a vehicle in the right lane, you shouldn't be passing.
Whats the bigger threat to public safety, a guy cruising 80 in a 70 or a trucker holding up traffic for miles by passing another vehicle driving <1 mph faster than the other vehicle?
Case in point: I drove to Juban Crossing yesterday. Left Hammond and did not exceed 60 mph until I got to the bridge before Walker. There were two trucks camped out in the left lane trying to pass a truck in the right. After they finally cleared, all manner of people weaved in and out to shoot past these guys.
I can't tell you how many times I see 18 wheelers in the morning drive with 40 car lengths in front of them camped out in the left and middle lanes. You say "Well it takes these trucks longer to stop". Great. Do it in the right hand lane.
Restrict truck traffic to right lane only or have the cops enforce the left lane passing only rules. If it takes you 40 miles to pass a vehicle in the right lane, you shouldn't be passing.
Whats the bigger threat to public safety, a guy cruising 80 in a 70 or a trucker holding up traffic for miles by passing another vehicle driving <1 mph faster than the other vehicle?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:35 am to SabiDojo
Government needs to enforce speed limits. Its called a limit. 55 urban 65 rural is enough
Montana no cars no people
Montana no cars no people
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:36 am to NewIberiaHaircut
Councilman Delgado does not approve of this PSA.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:36 am to Jcorye1
quote:
What I really want to know is, why would you fix Staring lane, and then lower the speed limit. Whatever hack congressman did that deserves to be tarred and feathered.
I challenge you to drive the speed limit on college or Essen from I10 to perkins.
Raise it to 90 on the interstates, I found some 85mph speed limits on west texas state roads. Wasn't bad.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 9:37 am to VetteGuy
Law and order nuts should want laws enforced.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News