- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If Britain were a US state it would be second poorest ahead of only Mississippi.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:28 pm
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:28 pm
This kind of surprised me, based on per capita GDP. LINK
UK article link above is based on
Ranking(Countries in bold):
Alaska
Wyoming
North Dakota
Connecticut
Delaware
New York
Massachusetts
Norway
New Jersey
Nebraska
Washington
Texas
Maryland
Minnesota
California
Illinois
Colorado
Oregon
South Dakota
Louisiana
Virginia
Switzerland
Iowa
Hawaii
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Pennsylvania
Kansas
Wisconsin
Ohio
Utah
Indiana
North Carolina
Nevada
Oklahoma
Vermont
Missouri
Georgia
Tennessee
New Mexico
Michigan
Sweden
Montana
Germany
Arizona
Kentucky
Maine
West Virginia
Idaho
South Carolina
Arkansas
Florida
Euro Area
Alabama
United Kingdom
Mississippi
I don't know why the article says Britain and then lists the UK...but I w/e. I thought it was interesting but GDP per capita is a pretty poor measurement too
UK article link above is based on
Ranking(Countries in bold):
Alaska
Wyoming
North Dakota
Connecticut
Delaware
New York
Massachusetts
Norway
New Jersey
Nebraska
Washington
Texas
Maryland
Minnesota
California
Illinois
Colorado
Oregon
South Dakota
Louisiana
Virginia
Switzerland
Iowa
Hawaii
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Pennsylvania
Kansas
Wisconsin
Ohio
Utah
Indiana
North Carolina
Nevada
Oklahoma
Vermont
Missouri
Georgia
Tennessee
New Mexico
Michigan
Sweden
Montana
Germany
Arizona
Kentucky
Maine
West Virginia
Idaho
South Carolina
Arkansas
Florida
Euro Area
Alabama
United Kingdom
Mississippi
I don't know why the article says Britain and then lists the UK...but I w/e. I thought it was interesting but GDP per capita is a pretty poor measurement too
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:29 pm to saintsfan92612
Surprised Louisina is so high on the list.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:30 pm to saintsfan92612
takes a lot of $ to support the lifestyles of the royal inbreds
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:32 pm to saintsfan92612
I cannot imagine how this could possibly be deceptive.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:33 pm to saintsfan92612
the comments in the second linked article are quite "anti-black"
its like reading the British OT
its like reading the British OT
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:34 pm to saintsfan92612
If the offer is to trade a state for the UK, Alabama would be the correct choice. Throw in Fulton County Georgia if necessary and get the deal done.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:36 pm to saintsfan92612
there's just no way this is true. If the UK were a state it would have the benefits that Mississippi has and would jump way up the list.
I mean London by itself, even if the rest of the country is a drain (which it isn't) blows Mississippi out of the water.
I mean London by itself, even if the rest of the country is a drain (which it isn't) blows Mississippi out of the water.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:42 pm to saintsfan92612
I heard Obama is going to adopt the European Union's mandatory "Adopt a Muslim" program for every American citizen that makes more than 20k a year so we should see those numbers go down soon.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:53 pm to saintsfan92612
How the frick they pay the soccer players?
Posted on 8/27/14 at 3:14 pm to saintsfan92612
Funny that when you ask about crime rates everyone wants to point at poverty but this kinda blows that shite out of the water now doesn't it. A lot of the names at the bottom of the list have low crime along with poverty.
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 8/27/14 at 3:26 pm to saintsfan92612
#s 1-3:
So the lesson is, have oil and gas, and don't have a lot of people.
quote:
Alaska
Wyoming
North Dakota
So the lesson is, have oil and gas, and don't have a lot of people.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 3:31 pm to saintsfan92612
I read that between 15 and 20% of the UK population lives in their version of housing projects called council buildings. They are supposed to be nicer and safer than American projects.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 3:35 pm to saintsfan92612
quote:
GDP per capita
This is what it's based on, and why AK, ND, and WY are so high (energy sector).
And why the tiny state of Delaware, which has some very large banks, is above TX.
It should also be noted that Britain would be by far the largest U.S. state.
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 8/27/14 at 3:38 pm to saintsfan92612
No they wouldn't be. If they were a US state, their gun laws would change and they would just take whatever they wanted.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 4:51 pm to saintsfan92612
The European countries never really recovered from WW2. Not to the industrial and military powers many of them once were.
Add in socialist policies and this is what you get. Take note America
Add in socialist policies and this is what you get. Take note America
Posted on 8/27/14 at 5:32 pm to saintsfan92612
quote:
If Britain were a US state it would be second poorest ahead of only Mississippi.
I'm currently accepting U.N. aid for those interested in making a donation.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News