- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:47 pm to shutterspeed
quote:
To her family it was a sign of distrust and disrespect
No disrespect to your in-laws but I think it's bullshite that they thought of it like that.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:47 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
~50% divorce rate.
Wrong. This is the most mis-stated 'truth' out there.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:48 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Just making sure you know pre nups only protect assets and funds owned before the marriage.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:48 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Because feelings.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:49 pm to shutterspeed
quote:
To her family it was a sign of distrust and disrespect
Now I ain't sayin' she a gold digger...
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:50 pm to TulaneUVA
quote:
Wrong. This is the most mis-stated 'truth' out there
What's the truth then?
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:51 pm to Henry Jones Jr
In this day and age, any woman who pretends to be "offended" by this is a gold digger and needs to get kicked to the curb. Don't fall for it. The more she resists, the more full of shite she is.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:54 pm to lighter345
quote:
Just making sure you know pre nups only protect assets and funds owned before the marriage.
cant you have one that says you wont have to pay alimony?
ETA; dumb question, i know the answer is yes
This post was edited on 3/10/14 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:55 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
No disrespect to your in-laws but I think it's bullshite that they thought of it like that.
Put yourself in their shoes for a moment.
I know how I'd feel about it if my precious daughter confided in me that her marriage was conditional on her signing a pre-nup agreement with the groom.
Not saying what's right and what's wrong. I'm just sayin.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:57 pm to shutterspeed
quote:
I know how I'd feel about it if my precious daughter confided in me that her marriage was conditional on her signing a pre-nup agreement with the groom.
I mean, I can't say I understand how they felt but I don't think I would be angry because I would understand their reasoning behind it.
But I haven't gone through that so I can't say how I would react.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:58 pm to Wooly
quote:
Louisiana: La. Civ. Code. Ann. Art. 2328 (2007): Statute different that UPAA; unlawful to limit alimony; agreement must be notarized; court approval need for modification.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:17 pm to Hillborn 22
quote:
Hillborn 22
Love the avatar.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:22 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Because I'm not a retard and actually got to know the girl before I married her. Tough shite if you married a psycho who wants to take your shite, that's on you. Also divorce is for pussies.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:23 pm to Turkey_Creek_Tiger
quote:only betas worry about losing their marriage
only betas cant convince their fiance to sign a prenup
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:32 pm to JumpingTheShark
quote:
Because I'm not a retard and actually got to know the girl before I married her
Ah, so everyone who ends up divorcing is a "retard?"
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:34 pm to TulaneUVA
quote:
Wrong. This is the most mis-stated 'truth' out there.
Agreed. This always bugs me when I hear it because people that use it ignore other variables. For instance, if both people are college graduates, the divorce rate goes way down.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:34 pm to JumpingTheShark
quote:Marriage is for bigger pussies.
divorce is for pussies.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:34 pm to Goldrush25
quote:quote:
Wrong. This is the most mis-stated 'truth' out there
What's the truth then?
Some info discrediting the 50% number: LINK LINK. Plenty more out there.
Basically, the 50% number was taken by dividing the number of marriages in a given year by the number of divorces in that year. Statistically, that makes zero sense because most of the time, people don't get married and divorced in the same year. They also don't consider whether it's the first, second, third etc. marriage/divorce.
Posted on 3/10/14 at 11:35 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Ah, so everyone who ends up divorcing is a "retard?"
Not the case, but people rushing into marriage is a rampant issue.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News