- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
AP: memo authorizes ICE to enter homes by force without a judicial warrant
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:04 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal immigration officers are asserting sweeping power to forcibly enter people’s homes without a judge’s warrant, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo obtained by The Associated Press, marking a sharp reversal of longstanding guidance meant to respect constitutional limits on government searches.
The memo authorizes ICE officers to use force to enter a residence based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant to arrest someone with a final order of removal, a move that advocates say collides with Fourth Amendment protections and upends years of advice given to immigrant communities.
34
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:09 pm to Ingeniero
Good.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:09 pm to Ingeniero
Oh no, the AP saw a MEMO!!
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:13 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant
So...they still have a warrant that grants them the power, just not from the activist judges the AP wants.
quote:
upends years of advice given to immigrant communities.
*illegal immigrant communities, and how is this ANY concern of ICE?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:13 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
advice given to immigrant communities.
I see the problem. If you have a final order of removal, the advice should have been to pack yo shite.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:14 pm to Ingeniero
What could possibly go wrong?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:14 pm to LegendInMyMind
The things that MAGA has rejected is getting stunning
Capitalism
Non-interventionism
States' rights
Textualism
....now the 4th Amendment
Capitalism
Non-interventionism
States' rights
Textualism
....now the 4th Amendment
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:15 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
they still have a warrant that grants them the power, just not from the activist judges the AP wants.
An administrative warrant is not the same as a search warrant for 4A purposes.
quote:
*illegal immigrant communities, and how is this ANY concern of ICE?
The 4th Amendment still applies to ICE
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
I mean it’s pretty clear if you asked these guys if they want fascism they would say no.
If you asked them if they wanted a strong executive who doesn’t put up with shite, exacts retribution on political foes, and exercises central government control over cultural issues they agree with all with a strong nationalist bent, they would say yes. They would say any congressional member or judge who tries to stop this man is an enemy to the people.
If you asked them if they wanted a strong executive who doesn’t put up with shite, exacts retribution on political foes, and exercises central government control over cultural issues they agree with all with a strong nationalist bent, they would say yes. They would say any congressional member or judge who tries to stop this man is an enemy to the people.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:23 pm to Ingeniero
It’s called probable cause. LEO’s have always been allowed to forcefully enter a home with probable cause, without a warrant.
ETA: I was wrong. I try to always admit when I’m wrong.
ETA: I was wrong. I try to always admit when I’m wrong.
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The 4th Amendment still applies to ICE
As lothed as i am to agree, SFP is correct there. 4t Ammendment shite fascinates me and i spent alot of time learning both sides. Lae Enforcdment cannot violate ghe curtlage of a home let alone enter without a search warrant. An arrest warrent is insufficent to enter.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:25 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What could possibly go wrong?
Anything is better than being raped and murdered, not that you care about that stuff
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:26 pm to djsdawg
Forego the law to save the nation. Ah yes, that refrain has never been used in history.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:30 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Anything is better than being raped and murdered, not that you care about that stuff
We should probably just jail everyone to ensure no one else gets raped or murdered.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:31 pm to Undertow
quote:
It’s called probable cause. LEO’s have always been allowed to forcefully enter a home with probable cause, without a warrant.
The OP indicates that an administrative warrant is still required.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:31 pm to Jesterea
They’re going to use the constitution to allow the country to be destroyed. And it looks like a lot of SFP posts and this:
The founders never believed that the constitution could work if the people hated the country. It was never supposed to be without qualifications and limitations.
“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt."
Sam Adams
"We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition, Revenge or Gallantry, would break the strongest Cords of our Constitution as a Whale goes through a Net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
John Adams
quote:
If you asked them if they wanted a strong executive who doesn’t put up with shite, exacts retribution on political foes, and exercises central government control over cultural issues they agree with all with a strong nationalist bent, they would say yes. They would say any congressional member or judge who tries to stop this man is an enemy to the people.
The founders never believed that the constitution could work if the people hated the country. It was never supposed to be without qualifications and limitations.
“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt."
Sam Adams
"We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition, Revenge or Gallantry, would break the strongest Cords of our Constitution as a Whale goes through a Net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
John Adams
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:33 pm to Ingeniero
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:33 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
quote:
Anything is better than being raped and murdered, not that you care about that stuff
We should probably just jail everyone to ensure no one else gets raped or murdered
Send us your address and we will start with you.
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 1/21/26 at 4:33 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
What could possibly go wrong?
Some of the more slippery ones still manage to elude capture?
Page 1 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News