- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How is Meta AI so terrible?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 12/12/25 at 3:15 pm
Every now and then I'll see something that is obviously fake and if you click on the AI summary it just hallucinates some nonsense to claim that the obvious fake stuff is real. You would think it would cross reference via a simple web search or something
The amount of investment that they're making in AI to have such a sloppy product is interesting to say the least
The amount of investment that they're making in AI to have such a sloppy product is interesting to say the least
6
Posted on 12/12/25 at 3:16 pm to Powerman
I'll contend that AI hasn't actually passed the Turing test.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 3:19 pm to The Baker
I don't think it has either
Some of it is impressive but I see a lot of flaws that are pretty apparent
The amount of stuff it just makes up is comical
Some of it is impressive but I see a lot of flaws that are pretty apparent
The amount of stuff it just makes up is comical
Posted on 12/12/25 at 3:54 pm to Powerman
quote:This board is regularly fooled by it - and I mean some pretty obvious fakes, too.
Some of it is impressive but I see a lot of flaws that are pretty apparent
The amount of stuff it just makes up is comical
It's quite easy to spot in its current state.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:11 pm to mudshuvl05
I don't get it
Are people just that gullible in general?
Are people just that gullible in general?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:20 pm to Powerman
Because it’s not actually AI, it’s a great internet search engine.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:20 pm to Oilfieldbiology
But it's not even good at that...
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:22 pm to mudshuvl05
quote:
This board is regularly fooled by it - and I mean some pretty obvious fakes, too.
Bear in mind the average age on this forum is probably 49
Posted on 12/12/25 at 4:32 pm to DB_tiger
49 isn't like 79 though
Those people grew up with technology
Those people grew up with technology
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:31 pm to The Baker
quote:
I'll contend that AI hasn't actually passed the Turing test.
Needs to stay that way. We don't need machines to totally take over the task of using our brains.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:32 pm to blue_morrison
Enough with AI. Stop using it people.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:43 pm to Powerman
Cause its Facebook
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:51 pm to Powerman
Grok is the only AI that’s consistently given me good results. ChatGPT has created entire imaginary realities for me
Posted on 12/12/25 at 11:44 pm to The Baker
quote:
I'll contend that AI hasn't actually passed the Turing test.
Well I’ve got some bad news for you.
arXiv link
quote:
Moreover, GPT-4.5-PERSONA achieved a win rate that was significantly above chance in both studies. This suggests that interrogators were not only unable to identify the real human witness, but were in fact more likely to believe this model was human than that other human participants were. This result, replicated across two populations, provides the first robust evidence that any system passes the original three-party Turing test.
A 50% win rate would “pass” the three-party Turing test, as it would mean that participants were unable to distinguish between the AI and another human. GPT-4.5’s win rate was 73%.
That means that when asked to identify the human between GPT-4.5 and another actual human, nearly 3/4 of participants said that GPT-4.5 was human and said that the actual human was AI.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 12:35 am to lostinbr
quote:
That means that when asked to identify the human between GPT-4.5 and another actual human, nearly 3/4 of participants said that GPT-4.5 was human and said that the actual human was AI.
The AI critics in here are in denial.
The rate of improvement is astonishing. The errors are meaningless in the big picture.
Take the changes we have seen in the last 30 years due to the Internet and imagine even greater change compressed into the next 36 months.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 12:43 am to Powerman
quote:
Those people grew up with technology
Posted on 12/13/25 at 2:36 am to Powerman
quote:
Are people just that gullible in general?
People want quick and easy “answers”
Posted on 12/13/25 at 3:32 am to Powerman
People eat the shite up
Saw one today.. it was that Pete Golding took the Michigan job … and so many people commented like “ WOWWWW” and “good for him”
They think everything is true . It’s so sad
Saw one today.. it was that Pete Golding took the Michigan job … and so many people commented like “ WOWWWW” and “good for him”
They think everything is true . It’s so sad
Posted on 12/13/25 at 5:02 am to Powerman
quote:
I don't get it Are people just that gullible in general?
Yes… yes they are that gullible in general; that, or too trusting of the system.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 5:42 am to Lawyered
quote:
People eat the shite up Saw one today.. it was that Pete Golding took the Michigan job … and so many people commented like “ WOWWWW” and “good for him” They think everything is true . It’s so sad
Is it really AI or someone posting stuff for clicks and likes as clickbait and using AI to generate deceptive imagery.
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 5:44 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News