Started By
Message

Salmon or Tuna

Posted on 9/23/25 at 10:40 am
Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3825 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 10:40 am
Let me start by saying I realize both are good options and I know I can have both. However I’m the kind of person who has the most success with weight loss and fitness when I eat the same thing for most of the week without mixing it up. Which fish would be better if you were eating it for lunch 5-6 days a week? I know tuna has slightly more protein but also more mercury. Salmon has more micro nutrients but more calories per serving. Is the mercury content a concern if I’m eating canned tuna 5-6 times a week? It’s light chunk which is suppose to be the lowest in mercury.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 10:40 am
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35659 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 10:44 am to
I hope you work from home
Posted by jose
Houma
Member since Feb 2009
29642 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 11:38 am to
I could eat salmon every day but for maybe a week. That would be enough for me for a long time.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
42427 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 11:42 am to
In a fair fight, tuna.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39427 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 11:48 am to
I love tuna but I feel I can do more with Salmon.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38168 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:03 pm to
Be careful with the mercury in tuna.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94556 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Is the mercury content a concern if I’m eating canned tuna 5-6 times a week?


Yes. Even chunk light tuna you are going to have to pace yourself to about 4 servings a week (if that) and that's with little to no additional mercury getting into your diet. That's my rule of thumb and I have gone months and months at that pace with no issues.

On the other hand, everyone is different and your mercury tolerance could be somewhat higher or lower than average.

With Salmon or most shellfish, yes, there is mercury, but nothing like the sky high concentrations of swordfish, shark, etc. And for tuna, albacore is roughly 2 1/2 to 3 times the concentration of chunk light (typically skipjack and the like) - the mercery concentration tends to go up with bigger and longer-lived fish species. Even whitefish is no slouch.

Setting aside the bigger crustaceans (lobster, crab), scallops and shrimp are practically nothing and even oysters, sardines, anchovies are reasonably safe for more or less daily consumption. Salmon, squid and catfish (again, depending on where they're harvested) are relatively lower than tuna or the big game fish.

So - short answer to your question - if you are eating the same seafood most days, it will need to be something like salmon or less, if you are concerned with limiting mercury intake.
Posted by OGtigerfan87
North La
Member since Feb 2019
3825 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:43 pm to
Thanks this was very helpful but. Or what I wanted to hear lol. I was planning on doing a light tuna salad with celery sticks most weekdays. Now seems like that is too much mercury
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
25771 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

I hope you work from home


I don't agree with this guy's approach to discussions here, but this made me laugh.

He ain't wrong.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
13331 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Be careful with the mercury in tuna.


Yep. Guy I know. Married to a doctor. Recently came down with Mercury poisoning.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38168 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Yep. Guy I know. Married to a doctor. Recently came down with Mercury poisoning.
I tested high recently. It must be the fish.
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7905 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 5:08 pm to
Out of the two, salmon is the better option, but sardines and mackerel work too. If you eat fish often (like I do), it’s smart to stick with varieties that are lower in heavy metals. Safe Catch tuna is another choice since they say it’s tested, hard to know how much to trust that, but it’s probably better than the regular stuff.
Posted by Gifman
Member since Jan 2021
16801 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 7:52 pm to
Salmon.. very rich in omega 3
Posted by Arkapigdiesel
Faulkner County
Member since Jun 2009
15330 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

I’m the kind of person who has the most success with weight loss and fitness when I eat the same thing for most of the week without mixing it up

Why not red meat? I patty out eight lbs of hamburger meat into eight oz patties. That makes 16 burgers. I'll grill 'em all up on my Big Green Egg, throw em in two one gallon ziploc bags and eat them until they're all done. Rinse and repeat.

Sometimes I just eat the burger and bun, sometimes I'll have a plain sweet potato with it, corn, etc.

I also mix up two boxes of the jello sugar free pudding and will throw in three scoops of casein protein powder in it and snack on it when I want something sweet.

I do occasionally eat salmon also, but it's a lot more expensive per lb than ground beef. Oh, if you go the ground beef route, I recommend getting half a cow or full cow processed.

I bought about 360 lbs of ground beef earlier this spring and am still eating on it. I eat a mega frick ton of red meat.
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
19727 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 9:30 pm to
Salmon > Tuna for me
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
12731 posts
Posted on 9/23/25 at 11:51 pm to
quote:

I eat a mega frick ton of red meat.

This is the way.
It doesn't piss off co-workers and it's cheap, grass fed from Sam's. It's more resistant to texture loss than fish is if you freeze it, etc. One of the only kinds of fish I can eat is canned tuna, which doesn't make sense to anyone but me.

I have resulted to tuna pre-seasoned packets in a pinch, but I need six of them to make a lunch, it's just not economical. Making your own tuna salad is great, but you don't get enough longevity out of it to meal prep on Sunday and get you through work lunches on Friday. That's enough for me to be out on fish.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36248 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Is the mercury content a concern if I’m eating canned tuna 5-6 times a week? It’s light chunk which is suppose to be the lowest in mercury.


yes


but to answer your question, depends on where you are macro wise. a tuna steak is going to be lower calories than a piece of tuna oz for oz.

but if you are talking canned....neither that many times a week.

Posted by Lazy But Talented
Member since Aug 2011
15018 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 9:58 am to
777

sent you an email whenever you get some time.
This post was edited on 9/24/25 at 9:59 am
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36248 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 10:50 am to
replied
Posted by Lazy But Talented
Member since Aug 2011
15018 posts
Posted on 9/24/25 at 11:20 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram