- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Time Magazine: "Trump ambushed the leader of South Africa"
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:19 am
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:19 am
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:20 am to stout
After this many ambushes you would think the president of South Africa would catch on.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:21 am to TrueTiger
How do they not change the script up a bit?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:22 am to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:24 am to stout
It's not like the South African was unaware of the situation. He just didn't want it brought up. That's not an ambush.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:25 am to stout
Got a feeling when heads of countries visit Trump in the future they are going to be ready.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:26 am to stout
Good. He deserved it. Genocide should be exposed.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:28 am to stout
It would make me so happy to see these two make up and work together.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:30 am to stout
It's at the White House. Every leader should expect tough questioning from the American president inside the White House.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:33 am to stout
What if they like, you know, reported on the genocide instead. That would be cool.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:39 am to stout
Good. A world leader shouldn’t be able to come to the WH and spout lies and BS.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 8:41 am to stout
quote:
Ron thought it was pretty cool
Almost as cool when the leader of SA replied, "I wish I had a plane to give you".....
That was funny.

Gotta be able to take it and give it.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:03 am to stout
I do not understand the idea that confrontation is bad, unbecoming, unfair, or unprofessional.
Ambush, unprofessional, bad, unbecoming are words used by those who were confronted, for good reason, and found to be in error or in the wrong.
So why is the media using such words? Were they confronted? No.
So that means they know they associate themselves with the ones in error or in the wrong (SA in this case, Ukraine in the case of Zelensky).
It is both an admission of guilt and lack of objectivity, both due to self-association.
Ambush, unprofessional, bad, unbecoming are words used by those who were confronted, for good reason, and found to be in error or in the wrong.
So why is the media using such words? Were they confronted? No.
So that means they know they associate themselves with the ones in error or in the wrong (SA in this case, Ukraine in the case of Zelensky).
It is both an admission of guilt and lack of objectivity, both due to self-association.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:04 am to stout
So the leader of South Africa openly calls for the murder of white farmers, and Trump is the bad guy for calling him out on it?
That has to get exhausting for people in the media to constantly have to take these positions just to oppose Trump.
That has to get exhausting for people in the media to constantly have to take these positions just to oppose Trump.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 9:09 am to LSUballs
quote:
What if they like, you know, reported on the genocide instead. That would be cool.
It's happening to wypipo.
They're more likely to sandpaper their skin and then bathe in lemon juice than to report the truth on this one.
Popular
Back to top
