Started By
Message

Thoughts on the MLB automated ball-strike system?

Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:01 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
132606 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:01 pm
I'm not a huge MLB fan but generally follow the game.





This post was edited on 2/19/25 at 4:02 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
171764 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:07 pm to
we don't even need the dumb umpire.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:07 pm to
It's not gonna be the cure-all everyone thinks it's going to be.

It's gonna take the human element out of that portion of the game.
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
8575 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:11 pm to
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
14466 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

It's gonna take the human element out of that portion of the game.

Oh God forbid we end up with accurate calls.

If they had this shite in the NFL, Chiefs would have never made the Super Bowl.

Getting the human element out is a GREAT thing.
Posted by LoneStarTiger
Lone Star State
Member since Aug 2004
16213 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:16 pm to
the challenges during MiLB games were annoying
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
12056 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:25 pm to
just what we need, 50 more rules on balls and strikes. Just let the machine get it right and end the charade.
Posted by KingofthePoint
Member since Feb 2009
10541 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

It's gonna take the human element out of that portion of the game.

Yeah. That’s the big selling point.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
38018 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:31 pm to
Whatever gets Angel Hernandez sued for backpay.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
99569 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

It's gonna take the human element out of that portion of the game.



Yes.
Posted by WestSideTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
4356 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:36 pm to
Strike zones aren’t one size fits all. You can still have human judgement and use the system for every pitch. Have a red and green light in the ump mask that only he can see. Also no light means too close to call and ump discretion. A challenge at that point plugs in some hitter parameters and forces the computer to make a call.


Posted by CONNECTICUTTIGER
RHODE ISLAND
Member since Apr 2006
1082 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

the challenges during MiLB games were annoying


Huh? The entire challenge would take like 10 seconds. I thought it was amazing.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
27852 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:53 pm to
This is an area where I’ve never minded the human element. I don’t think I’ve ever been mad enough to blame a loss in the MLB because of balls and strikes. College…different story.

Baseball is art. Art is imperfect. Artists like Greg Maddux would feast on the extra inch an ump would give him. Artists like Tony Gwynn probably knew every ump’s K zone better than anybody.
Posted by RebelTheBear
Saban's spare bedroom
Member since Aug 2016
5759 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 4:58 pm to
I'll never argue that getting ball and strike calls correct would be detrimental to the game, but I'd personally hate to lose on-field umpiring in any way. It adds to the allure of baseball.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
27852 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

I'll never argue that getting ball and strike calls correct would be detrimental to the game, but I'd personally hate to lose on-field umpiring in any way. It adds to the allure of baseball.


Yeah, pretty much.
Posted by msutiger
Houston
Member since Jul 2008
70548 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Huh? The entire challenge would take like 10 seconds. I thought it was amazing.



Yeah I didn't know it was a thing until I went to a Sugar Land game and it is awesome. Challenge takes no time at all and doesn't have much, if any, impact on pace of play.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
33832 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

I'll never argue that getting ball and strike calls correct would be detrimental to the game, but I'd personally hate to lose on-field umpiring in any way. It adds to the allure of baseball.


Well, until they find a way to mechanize all the other calls the home plate ump calls (balk, safe/out at home, foul/fair ball, etc) I think you're fine.

Umpires being shitty at one aspect of their job sometimes, an aspect which we can fix, is not something we should endure because "that's baseball, man!" That's dumb.

Do you people who don't want this type of review in baseball also dislike the in/out review in tennis? The in/out review in volleyball?
This post was edited on 2/19/25 at 5:10 pm
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
33832 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Strike zones aren’t one size fits all.


Look at the middle image above...it's a percentage of the height of the batter for the upper and lower strike zone.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 6:39 pm to
People bitch about MLB umps but they are by far the best officials of any pro sport.
Posted by TroyTider
Florida Panhandle
Member since Oct 2009
3906 posts
Posted on 2/19/25 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

MLB umps are by far the best officials of any pro sport.


MLB umpires should be the best Sports Officials. They get 162 games a year. Basketball gets half that many games.

But Football officials only get about 10% of the opportunities to Perfect their craft that major league umpires get Every year.

Pretty easy to understand why. It’s all about the reps.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram