RebelTheBear

Both are great and offer two different gameplay experiences. As others have said, COD is more run and shoot and high-paced, while Battlefield is full-scale, large map warfare.

COD was undeniably better and more popular at its peak. Both Battlefield and COD peaked insanely high in the late 2000s/early 2010s, but earlier COD games like Modern Warfare, WaW, MW2, Black Ops, MW3, and BO2 are considered some of the greatest first person shooters of all time. Modern Warfare's online multiplayer was one of the most revolutionary gaming experiences we've ever seen - it fundamentally redefined the first person shooter genre and created a blueprint that first person shooter games still use today.

Battlefield has always had deeper gameplay but was less approachable due to its more complex nature. So, it wasn't as popular as COD was back then. That's not to say that Battlefield games weren't good - I started Battlefield at BF3 and played BF4 and Battlefield 1 (World War 1 era) a good bit. Finding a tank and blowing shite up with it is a really cool experience BF offers that COD can't.

It wasn't until last year that Battlefield became more popular than COD in terms of sales - Battlefield 6 outsold COD Black Ops 7 over the year 2025, marking a massive shift in gamer interest from COD to Battlefield.

If you're looking for what people are currently playing, Battlefield 6 is the better choice over COD BO7. Any of the more modern COD titles are really not worth playing. Battlefield 6 usually gets a few million weekly active players worldwide per week I think, I read somewhere around 1.5 million on console.

Here's the thing though - the original Black Ops 2 game from like 2012 or 2013 was just ported over to modern consoles and is available on both the PS and Xbox stores. As of three weeks ago, the modern port of Black Ops 2 reached 5.25 MILLION weekly players on Playstation alone.

So, here's the answer to your question - historically, COD is a better game series than Battlefield and it's not particularly close. COD's earlier entries outshine anything Battlefield has ever produced, and modern ports of older COD games are outperforming Battlefield's current product. Which ever game you like will come down to preference obviously, but there's no doubt that COD is the better game series overall.

As a head coach, being a good team manager is better than being a good X's and O's guy. X's and O's can be left to coordinators and assistant coaches to some degree, but your head coach has to be the team manager and tone setter for the program no matter what.

Bonus points if you're a good program builders AND a good X's and O's guy

Denied again :wah:

It's already been answered, but it takes more intertia to start the fan blades in motion than it does to keep them in motion. Also, for a box fan to blow air at a speed that is worthwhile, the blades have to spin pretty quick, even at the "low" setting

Gene Chizik is easily the best answer here

No. 89 overall prospect and no. 3 player in the state of Mississippi, Ben'Jarvius Shumaker, has been committed to Ole Miss since March of 2026. Earlier today, he flipped his commitment to Colorado around noon. Roughly nine hours later, Shumaker flipped his commitment back to Ole Miss, apologizing for the "confusion" around his recruitment.

This sport is cooked beyond belief but God it is fun :lol:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

They have the money to throw at someone and tamper, why are they hitching their wagon to something so radioactive?

---

Because the idea for years has been to fight the NCAA tooth and nail regardless of how wrong you might be. Problem is, they're so far in the wrong here that the general public despises them. This isn't a case of a kid seeking an extra year of eligibility because he was taking care of his sick mom - it's a kid who illegally bet on his own team's football games and is trying to play regardless.

Pure lunacy

LFG

Wreck’em!

Cover 1 is a risky proposition in college unless your corners are top notch. Any time I see college teams playing Cover 1, I immediately look outside to the X receiver and see how the corner is covering him. If the corner is pressing the X receiver, it's game over. You might give up more yards underneath playing Cover 3, but you're less likely to give up the deep shot.

I'd lean Cover 3 myself

Utermark with a solo shot. 7-0 Rebs