- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump looks to end carried interest tax loophole, hitting Wall Street’s wealthiest
Posted on 2/7/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 2/7/25 at 12:49 pm
quote:
Trump looks to end a controversial tax loophole that has enriched Wall Street’s wealthiest for years
by Christian Hetzner
February 7, 2025
A little-known provision in the tax code allows private equity managers and hedge fund speculators to treat their earnings not as income but as capital gains, allowing them to cut their tax burden by roughly half. But previous attempts to crack down on the practice failed as Wall Street whales like Blackstone’s Steven Schwarzman compared an attack to the Nazi blitzkrieg.
President Donald Trump is mounting another effort to eliminate a controversial loophole that has long allowed Wall Street’s überwealthy to evade millions of dollars in taxes every year.
At stake is a little-known provision known as “carried interest” that benefits private equity managers, hedge fund speculators, and other investment professionals.
It allows them to treat personal earnings not as income in the legal sense but as capital gains—subject to a far lower bracket that can halve their tax burden.
Ever since Wall Street’s bankers were bailed out of their high-risk bets that triggered the global financial crisis, politicians like Barack Obama have taken aim at this loophole.
And even Trump, during his first run for the presidency, argued billionaire speculators were “getting away with murder” thanks to this peculiarity.
This latest attempt to crack down on the practice comes amid a broader tax relief plan the administration is trying to push through Congress at a sensitive time when the country’s finances are already strained.
The package includes an extension to Trump’s signature 2017 tax cut, which is due to sunset at the end of this year if new legislation is not passed.
“This will be the largest tax cut in history for middle-class working Americans. The president is committed to working with Congress to get this done,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday, defending the package.
...
Lastly, success in closing the carried-interest loophole is anything but guaranteed.
If there has been one economic policy on Capitol Hill that enjoys bipartisan consensus, it was that this tax break for ultrawealthy speculators, who are well-known for generously donating to political campaigns, can be attacked but must never actually be touched.
As a result, each and every time an attempt has been made to deprive Wall Street of its coveted tax loophole—including Trump’s own 2017 tax cut—any references that might follow through mysteriously vanish from the final bill.
In fact, Wall Street famously felt so strongly about retaining this boon that Steven Schwarzman, the CEO of Blackstone, once compared the very idea of eliminating it to nothing less than the Nazi blitzkrieg.
In comments the private equity speculator later was forced to walk back, he scathed: “It’s like when Hitler invaded Poland in 1939.”
LINK
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:03 pm to NC_Tigah
Self employed. Can I get away with amending my taxable earnings as capital gains instead of income?
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:04 pm to NC_Tigah
So no tax cuts for the 1%
This has to be gearing up for some type of low Biz Tax and flat income tax no?

This has to be gearing up for some type of low Biz Tax and flat income tax no?
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:06 pm to NC_Tigah
Might lose a few GOP house members in NY and NJ if this provision is in there. The hedge fund lobby is powerful. I'm on the fence as to whether it should be continued or not. On net, it probably reduces investment, but so much PE investment this day and age is BS to begin with.
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:09 pm to NC_Tigah
Unpossible; I was told that Drumph was hellbent on protecting the rich; especially at the expense of the common man
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:09 pm to NC_Tigah
Which brings me back to my long help belief. Income tax should be a flat tax if it exist. NO exceptions. Not tax breaks, no deductions.
And
I don't give a F how you made your money. If you made money via dividend or from an employer it should be treated the same.
And
I don't give a F how you made your money. If you made money via dividend or from an employer it should be treated the same.
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:14 pm to NC_Tigah
Trump is going to have the democrats come out as protectors of the Uber rich by having them declare it unfairly puts a burden upon them
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:19 pm to Nosevens
quote:That actually was the Dem position when Obama was taxing the hell out of "rich people"
democrats come out as protectors of the Uber rich by having them declare it unfairly puts a burden upon them
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:20 pm to NC_Tigah
I was told he hated the middle class and didn’t want wealthy people to pay any taxes at all.
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:22 pm to NC_Tigah
Haven't the left rained on Trump for making rich people wealthier??
Man this is going to be a long 4 years for Democrats. And a short 4 years for us regular people.

Man this is going to be a long 4 years for Democrats. And a short 4 years for us regular people.
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:27 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
But previous attempts to crack down on the practice failed as Wall Street whales like Blackstone’s Steven Schwarzman compared an attack to the Nazi blitzkrieg
Trump could make an agency to make hedge fund guys pay their taxes and call the building the “hall of cost”
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:30 pm to GeneralLee
JD should be looking for career opportunities for Jan. 29 and beyond because his hedgefund/ VC masters like Thiel are not going to like this.
This post was edited on 2/7/25 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:31 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Which brings me back to my long help belief. Income tax should be a flat tax if it exist. NO exceptions. Not tax breaks, no deductions. And I don't give a F how you made your money. If you made money via dividend or from an employer it should be treated the same.
I know that most people on this board know this, but it begs repeating for the low information OT types lurking...taxes are the way they are for control reasons. When you have the ability to pick winners and losers in the tax game, you have incredible power and influence. The GOP doesnt wanna give up this power either
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:32 pm to KiwiHead
Good lord you are just such a terrible and dumb poster
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:32 pm to omegaman66
quote:
I don't give a F how you made your money. If you made money via dividend or from an employer it should be treated the same.
What if it came from USAID?
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:33 pm to NC_Tigah
If he was serious about this he could make it happen - find a provision that affects the middle class and declare that the IRS would interpret it to mean half of what it means, cutting their tax burden by 50%, then issue a blanket pardon to all of those tax payers, and tell Congress that will stop when they end this loophole.
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:33 pm to NC_Tigah
"No, those are the good billionaires. When we said eat the rich we meant only the right leaning rich."
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:35 pm to dcbl
quote:
Unpossible; I was told that Drumph was hellbent on protecting the rich; especially at the expense of the common man
I always hated this line anyway.
Did trump lower taxes for me? Yes.
At that point I don't care who else had their taxes lowered or raised because mine were lower. Plus, rich people still pay way more in taxes than me.
Posted on 2/7/25 at 1:56 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
On net, it probably reduces investment, but so much PE investment this day and age is BS to begin with.
It won’t reduce investment. It just might make the fund manager buy a smaller house on Martha’s Vineyard. This should have been closed years ago, they’re making plenty of money.
Posted on 2/7/25 at 2:12 pm to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
What if it came from USAID?
Income. Tax it as income. Because that is what it is... Income!
Popular
Back to top
